Chun-Mei Li1, Chen-Lu Xie2, Shuang Hu1, Qiang Sun1, Guang-Hui Li1, Zhi-Xing Niu1, Ming-Lei Sun1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China. 2. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to observe the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) by continuous negative pressure drainage and saline irrigation in the treatment of oral and maxillofacial space infection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 116 cases of maxillofacial space infection, and clinical data were collected to compare the therapeutic effects of routine incision with drainage treatment (traditional treatment group, 58 cases) and VSD treatment (VSD group, 58 cases). RESULTS: The length of hospital stay, white blood cell count, scar length, frequency of dressing change, and pain degree of patients in the VSD group were all lower than those in the traditional treatment group. Moreover, the improvement degree of mouth opening in the VSD groups was better than that in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VSD is a more effective method for the treatment of oral and maxillofacial space infection.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to observe the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) by continuous negative pressure drainage and saline irrigation in the treatment of oral and maxillofacial space infection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 116 cases of maxillofacial space infection, and clinical data were collected to compare the therapeutic effects of routine incision with drainage treatment (traditional treatment group, 58 cases) and VSD treatment (VSD group, 58 cases). RESULTS: The length of hospital stay, white blood cell count, scar length, frequency of dressing change, and pain degree of patients in the VSD group were all lower than those in the traditional treatment group. Moreover, the improvement degree of mouth opening in the VSD groups was better than that in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VSD is a more effective method for the treatment of oral and maxillofacial space infection.
Entities:
Keywords:
incision and drainage; oral and maxillofacial; space infection; vacuum sealing drainage