Literature DB >> 30854688

Genome-wide Association Studies of Specific Antinuclear Autoantibody Subphenotypes in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Chan Wang1, Xiaodong Zheng2, Peng Jiang1, Ruqi Tang3, Yuhua Gong4, Yaping Dai5, Lan Wang6, Ping Xu7, Wenjuan Sun1, Lu Wang1, Chongxu Han8, Yuzhang Jiang9, Yiran Wei3, Kui Zhang10, Jian Wu11, Youlin Shao12, Yueqiu Gao13, Jianjiang Yu14, Zhigang Hu15, Zhidong Zang16, Yi Zhao17, Xudong Wu18, Na Dai19, Lei Liu20, Jinshan Nie21, Bo Jiang22, Maosong Lin23, Li Li24, You Li3, Sufang Chen7, Lixin Shu1, Fang Qiu1, Qiuyuan Wu1, Mingming Zhang1, Ru Chen1, Rohil Jawed1, Yu Zhang1, Xingjuan Shi1, Zhen Zhu12, Hao Pei5, Lihua Huang5, Weifeng Zhao25, Ye Tian26, Xiang Zhu7, Hong Qiu6, M Eric Gershwin27, Weichang Chen25, Michael F Seldin28, Xiangdong Liu1, Liangdan Sun2, Xiong Ma3.   

Abstract

Anti-nuclear antibodies to speckled 100 kDa (sp100) and glycoprotein 210 (gp210) are specific serologic markers of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) of uncertain/controversial clinical or prognostic significance. To study the genetic determinants associated with sp100 and gp210 autoantibody subphenotypes, we performed a genome-wide association analysis of 930 PBC cases based on their autoantibody status, followed by a replication study in 1,252 PBC cases. We confirmed single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs492899 (P = 3.27 × 10-22 ; odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34-3.66) and rs1794280 (P = 5.78 × 10-28 ; OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 3.05-4.96) in the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region associated with the sp100 autoantibody. However, no genetic variant was identified as being associated with the gp210 autoantibody. To further define specific classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles or amino acids associated with the sp100 autoantibody, we imputed 922 PBC cases (211 anti-sp100-positive versus 711 negative cases) using a Han Chinese MHC reference database. Conditional analysis identified that HLA-DRβ1-Asn77/Arg74, DRβ1-Ser37, and DPβ1-Lys65 were major determinants for sp100 production. For the classical HLA alleles, the strongest association was with DRB1*03:01 (P = 1.51 × 10-9 ; OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.06-4.29). Regression analysis with classical HLA alleles identified DRB1*03:01, DRB1*15:01, DRB1*01, and DPB1*03:01 alleles can explain most of the HLA association with sp100 autoantibody.
Conclusion: This study indicated significant genetic predisposition to the sp100 autoantibody, but not the gp210 autoantibody, subphenotype in PBC patients. Additional studies will be necessary to determine if these findings have clinical significance to PBC pathogenesis and/or therapeutics.
© 2019 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30854688      PMCID: PMC6618054          DOI: 10.1002/hep.30604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


amino acid anti‐mitochondrial antibody anti‐nuclear antibody confidence interval glycoprotein 210 genome‐wide association human leukocyte antigen interleukin 12 IL12 receptor linkage disequilibrium minor allele frequency major histocompatibility complex optical density odds ratio primary biliary cholangitis phosphate‐buffered saline single‐nucleotide polymorphism speckled 100 kDa Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation and destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. PBC is mainly observed in middle‐aged women. Patients with PBC generally present with abnormal liver tests including elevation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), and combinations of symptoms, including pruritus, fatigue, and portal hypertension.1 Anti‐mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are the serological hallmark for PBC and are found in nearly 95% of patients.2 Several large‐scale genome‐wide association (GWA) studies in European, Japanese, and Han Chinese PBC cohorts have pointed to a strong genetic predisposition to PBC.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and common polymorphisms in interleukin 12 (IL12), IL12 receptor (IL12R), tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 15 (TNFSF15), IL21, IL21R, and other immune‐associated genes have been implicated in PBC pathogenesis.3, 5, 6 Although these studies provided many insights in our understanding of PBC pathogenesis, no further studies have examined the genetics of subphenotypes in PBC. Other than AMA, autoantibodies to glycoprotein 210 (gp210) and speckled 100 kDa (sp100), the two subtypes of anti‐nuclear antibodies (ANA), are also highly specific to PBC and can be detected in 10%‐40% of PBC patients.8, 9, 10 Anti‐gp210 and sp100‐positive serum samples present typical rim and multinuclear dot staining patterns, respectively. Anti‐gp210 antibody recognizes a single epitope containing 25 amino acids (AAs) in the C‐terminal tail of nuclear pore gp210 protein.11 Several studies have indicated that autoantibody to gp210 can serve as an indicator of poor prognosis. Muratori et al. found that anti‐gp210 positivity was associated with higher serum cholestatic parameters including ALP, GGT, and bilirubin.8 Unfavorable clinical outcome, more rapid disease progression, and significantly higher hepatic failure were found in anti‐gp210‐positive patients.11, 12, 13 Recently, Yang et al. found that anti‐gp210 positivity is associated with more severe forms of PBC in Chinese patients with prognostic value.14, 15 Sp100 is a component of promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and sp100‐containing nuclear bodies. Anti‐sp100 antibodies in PBC patients recognize multiple epitopes in sp100.16 Studies on the clinical significance of anti‐sp100 antibody have thus far generated mixed results.17, 18, 19, 20 A few early studies indicated that the anti‐sp100‐positive patient group tended to have earlier disease onset and more frequently had cirrhosis compared to anti‐sp100‐negative patients. Studies by Nakamura et al.12 and Yang et al.14 found no correlation of anti‐sp100 positivity with disease prognosis, but neither study investigated the subtypes of autoantibodies. Two semiquantitative analyses of anti‐sp100 antibody titers during the course of the treatment found a correlation of anti‐sp100 titers with Mayo risk score, an indicator of disease severity.17, 19 Because sp100 autoantibodies recognized multiple epitopes on sp100, an earlier study found a change of some anti‐sp100 epitopes during the course of disease progression and ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment in some PBC patients, but the overall anti‐sp100 status remained unchanged.21 Unfortunately, no subsequent follow‐up or replication studies were reported by other researchers. Therefore, it remains undetermined whether any anti‐sp100 immunoglobulin subtypes or titers can serve as indicators of disease progression. We recently performed a large‐scale GWA analysis in a Han Chinese PBC cohort and identified multiple common variants in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, TNFSF15, IL21, IL21R, chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) receptor 5, cluster of differentiation 58, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4, and other immune‐related genes associated with PBC.6 To further define the role of genetic factors associated with different PBC subphenotypes (anti‐gp210/anti‐sp100) at the whole‐genome level, we undertook serological analysis of anti‐gp210/anti‐sp100 status in our PBC cases. Combining the serological results and genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, we systematically performed the association analysis to pinpoint the genetic variants associated with gp210 and sp100 autoantibody subphenotypes in PBC. The results presented in this report indicate a strong genetic predisposition to the sp100 autoantibody subphenotype in PBC patients.

Patients and Methods

Patient Information and Genome‐Wide Genotyping

The PBC patients recruited in this study have been reported previously.6 The PBC patients were recruited with the approval of the research ethics boards of Southeast University and Jiaotong University and in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects recruited. In brief, all patients self‐reported Han Chinese origin and were diagnosed based on the criteria recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.22 SNP genotyping was performed using Han Chinese population–specific HumanOmniZhongHua‐8 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The quality control of genotyping results was detailed in our GWA report.6 We removed SNPs with a call rate of <90%, a minor allele frequency (MAF) < 1%, and a Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium P value < 1 × 10−4. Potential genetic relatedness based on pairwise identity by descent for all of the successfully genotyped individuals was examined using PLINK 1.07 software.23 If first‐degree or second‐degree relative pairs were identified (PI‐HAT value > 0.25), we removed the samples with the lower genotyping call rates of the related individuals. SNPs located on the X, Y, or mitochondrial chromosomes and all copy number variation probes were excluded.

Enzyme‐Linked Immunosorbent Assay for ANTI‐sp100 and ANTI‐gp210 Antibodies

Serum samples were stored at −80°C in aliquot before use. Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates (96‐well, 100 ng/well) were coated overnight at 4°C with purified sp100 antigen (AA position 296‐386) or gp210 antigen (AA position 1863‐1887). The plate was further incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 hours at room temperature and washed 3 times with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). Serum samples were diluted (1:200) with PBS buffer containing 1% BSA. After incubation for 1 hour at 37°C, the plate was washed 4 times with PBS and incubated with 1:40,000 diluted peroxidase‐conjugated antihuman immunoglobulin G antibody (Genscript, China) at room temperature for 1 hour. Next, after washing 4 times with PBS, the plate was incubated with 100 μL of chromogenic substrate (3,3,5,5‐tetramethylbenzidine) for 20 minutes, with addition of 2 M sulfuric acid (50 μL/well) as the stop solution. Optical density (OD) was read by an ELISA plate reader with absorbance at 450 nm. The results with an OD ratio higher than 3 times over negative controls were defined as antibody‐positive. Samples with an OD ratio between 2 and 3 times were retested and excluded if ambiguous on multiple testing with different serum dilutions.

SNP Genotyping

SNP genotyping in the replication study was performed by TaqMan assay for rs492899 and rs9380343 and by Sanger DNA sequencing for rs1794280. The primer and probe sequences are listed in Supporting Table S1. The TaqMan assay was performed using a Bio‐Rad CFX Manager Real‐Time PCR system in 10 μL of reaction mixtures containing 1 × PCR buffer, 2 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate mix, 2 μM of each primer, 3 μM of labeled probe, 0.25 U Taq HS polymerase (Takara, Dalian), 5 ng of genomic DNA, and 6.15 μL deionized water. PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds and 60ºC or 62°C for 30 seconds.

Imputation of HLA Alleles, AAs, and SNPs in MHC Region and Association Analysis

The genotyped 7,889 SNPs in the MHC region (chromosome 6 region at 29‐34 Mb, University of California Santa Cruz hg19 assembly) included on the HumanOmniZhongHua‐8 BeadChip were extracted for analysis. Imputation was performed using a Han MHC reference panel built by deep sequencing that contains 29,948 variants for 10,689 healthy Han Chinese subjects.24 SNP2HLA and Beagle software was used to impute SNPs, two‐digit and four‐digit HLA alleles, and HLA AAs.25, 26 We applied postimputation quality control criteria of MAF > 0.01, imputation quality (r 2 > 0.3). Finally, we excluded subjects and SNPs with < 90% genotyping completion and/or Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium P < 1 × 10−4 or MAF < 0.01. A total of 23,137 variants were imputed. Among them, there were 22,317 SNP or insertion/deletions (including 7,889 input SNPs from GWA), 657 AA variants from HLA class I and II antigens, and 163 classical HLA alleles (66 two‐digit alleles and 97 four‐digit alleles). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis for selected SNPs was performed using the Haploview program.27

Statistical Analysis

Variant associations were tested using logistic regression models with autoantibody status (positive/negative) as the outcome variable. The statistical results were presented without genomic control correction as there is negligible evidence of population stratification in our previous study.6 Stepwise conditional analysis were used to identify independent variants of the HLA allele or AA polymorphisms for two subphenotypes of PBC by selecting the most significant associated variant as a covariate until no variant satisfied the threshold (P < 2.11 × 10−6). Meta‐analysis based on a fixed‐effect model for the two independent PBC cohorts was performed using Stata12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

Determination of ANTI‐sp100 and ANTI‐gp210 Status in PBC GWA and Replication Cohorts

Anti‐gp210 was detected in 350/912 (38.38%) of the cases, while anti‐sp100 was found in 211/922 (22.89%) subjects. Of the 904 subjects successfully tested for both gp210 and sp100 antibodies, 87 (9.62%) were positive for both autoantibodies and 432 (47.79%) were negative for both antibodies. In the replication cohort, 1,252 subjects were analyzed. Anti‐gp210 was detected in 444 (35.46%) of the cases, while anti‐sp100 was found in 234 (18.69%) subjects. Among them, 122 (9.74%) were positive for both autoantibodies, and 696 (55.59%) were negative for both antibodies (Table 1).
Table 1

Sample Information for the Discovery and Replication Study for Anti‐sp100 and Anti‐gp210 Among PBC Patients

NumberAnti‐gp210Anti‐sp100Anti‐gp210/Anti‐sp100Anti‐gp210/Anti‐sp100
PositiveNegativeMissingPositiveNegativeMissingBoth PositiveBoth Negative
Total cases2,1827941,370184451,72982091,128
GWAS cases93035056218211711887432
Male3120302
Female92734956221170887430
Age (mean ± SD)54.20 ± 6.3654.04 ± 11.3154.47 ± 6.3654.91 ± 2.8353.97 ± 0.7154.66 ± 7.7956.51 ± 2.12
Replication cases1,25244480802341,0180122696
Male18582103431422989
Female1,06736270519187693607
Age (mean ± SD)55.93 ± 2.8356.75 ± 6.3655.48 ± 7.7957.16 ± 13.4455.65 ± 2.8357.85 ± 16.2655.31 ± 7.78
Sample Information for the Discovery and Replication Study for Anti‐sp100 and Anti‐gp210 Among PBC Patients

GWA Analysis and Replication Study for ANTI‐gp210 Subphenotype

In total 794,694 autosomal SNPs were analyzed between 350 anti‐gp210‐positive and 562 negative subjects. No SNP achieved genome‐wide significance (P < 5 × 10−8) (Fig. 1 and Table 2), and the strongest association was the HLA class II SNP rs1794280 (P = 1.86 × 10−6; odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27‐0.59). There were 15 SNPs in the MHC region with P < 1.0 × 10−5. We performed LD analysis using these SNPs and identified two separate LD blocks (Supporting Fig. S1). To further test for possible HLA associations, we selected one SNP from each of two separate LD blocks (rs1794280 and rs9380343) for replication in the second PBC cohort with 444 anti‐gp210‐positive and 808 anti‐gp210‐negative subjects. We found no significant association with rs1794289 (P = 0.11; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53‐1.07) and rs9280343 (P = 0.08; OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98‐1.37) in the replication cohort. Meta‐analysis, including 794 anti‐gp210‐positive and 1,370 negative subjects showed decreased association compared to the GWA result (Table 3). Our results did not confirm the association of rs1794280 and rs9380343 with anti‐gp210 phenotype.
Figure 1

Manhattan and Q‐Q plots of anti‐gp210 and anti‐sp100 GWA results. (A) Manhattan plot of anti‐gp210‐GWA results; (B) Manhattan plot of anti‐sp100 GWA results; (C) Q‐Q plot of anti‐gp210‐GWA results; (D) Q‐Q plot of anti‐sp100 GWA results. (A,B) The horizontal axis shows genomic position, and the vertical axis shows the −log P values for association. The horizontal red line (P = 5 × 10−8) was set as the GWA significance threshold. (C,D) The red line is for null expectation, and the plot in blue is for P values including HLA SNPs, whereas the plot in black is for the P value after excluding SNPs in the MHC region.

Table 2

Genetic Association Analysis of Anti‐gp210 or Anti‐sp100 With GWAS Data in Han Chinese PBC

AssociationSNPPosition (hg19)A1/A2Antibody‐PositiveAntibody‐Negative P OR (95% CI)Location
Anti‐gp210* rs179428032667171T/A0.0410.0981.86 × 10−6 0.40 (0.27‐0.59)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQA2
kgp150526933053609A/G0.4920.3872.50 × 10−6 1.53 (1.28–1.83)Missense variant of HLA‐DPB1
rs938034333079166A/G0.4980.3942.64 × 10−6 1.53 (1.28–1.82)Upstream of HLA‐DPB2
rs934890633080360C/A0.4960.3932.92 × 10−6 1.53 (1.28–1.82)Missense variant of HLA‐DPB2
rs1048456933058952A/G0.4850.3833.29 × 10−6 1.52 (1.27–1.81)Downstream of HLA‐DPB1
rs206820433058718A/G0.4850.3843.91 × 10−6 1.52 (1.27–1.81)Downstream of HLA‐DPB1
rs428243833072172C/A0.4840.3834.27 × 10−6 1.51 (1.27–1.81)Upstream of HLA‐DPB2
rs309764933056962A/G0.4840.3834.38 × 10−6 1.51 (1.27–1.81)3UTR of HLA‐DPB1
rs929608133076661C/G0.4850.3854.64 × 10−6 1.51 (1.27–1.80)Upstream of HLA‐DPB2
rs645771333077776A/G0.4850.3854.64 × 10−6 1.51 (1.27–1.80)Upstream of HLA‐DPB2
rs929608033076539A/G0.4850.3855.51 × 10−6 1.51 (1.27–1.80)Upstream of HLA‐DPB2
rs313497732651641A/C0.0410.0937.97 × 10−6 0.42 (0.28‐0.62)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQB2
rs312971632657436G/A0.0410.0937.97 × 10−6 0.42 (0.28‐0.62)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQB2
rs777037033048921A/G0.3680.4668.60 × 10−6 0.67 (0.56‐0.80)Intron variant of HLA‐DPB1
rs935715633041073A/C0.2750.3689.06 × 10−6 0.65 (0.54‐0.79)Intron variant of HLA‐DPA1
Anti‐sp100 rs179428032667171T/A0.1400.0554.83 × 10−10 2.79 (2.00‐3.90)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQA2
rs313497732651641A/C0.1320.0533.52 × 10−9 2.69 (1.92‐3.78)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQB2
rs312971632657436G/A0.1320.0533.52 × 10−9 2.69 (1.92‐3.78)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB1 and HLA‐DQB2
rs49289931933518G/A0.1690.0822.49 × 10−8 2.28 (1.70‐3.06)Intron variant of SKIV2L
rs926857732395942A/G0.1260.0534.01 × 10−8 2.55 (1.81‐3.59)Between BTNL2 and HLA‐DRA
rs998664032764970A/G0.1010.0384.50 × 10−8 2.84 (1.93‐4.18)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB2 and HLA‐DOB
rs950121232760006G/A0.1010.0385.18 × 10−8 2.83 (1.92‐4.16)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB2 and HLA‐DOB
rs692597632755092C/A0.1010.0385.18 × 10−8 2.83 (1.92‐4.16)Intergenic between HLA‐DQB2 and HLA‐DOB
rs47453431938107G/A0.1850.0968.19 × 10−8 2.13 (1.61–2.82)Intron variant of DOMSZ

P values are calculated based on a data set of 350 anti‐gp210‐positive and 562 anti‐gp210‐negative PBC cases. All SNPs in the chromosome 6 MHC region with P values < 1 × 10−5 are shown.

P values are calculated based on a data set of 211 anti‐sp100‐positive and 711 anti‐sp100‐negative PBC cases. All SNPs in the chromosome 6 MHC region with P values < 1 × 10−7 are shown.

Abbreviations: A1, minor allele; A2, major allele; UTR, untranslated region.

Table 3

Summary of ANA (Anti‐sp100 and Anti‐gp210) Association for Genotyped Variants in PBC Cohorts at Two‐Stage Study

Anti‐sp100Anti‐gp210
rs1794280rs492899rs1794280rs9380343
Position (hg19)32667171319335183266717133079166
A1/A2T/AG/AT/AT/C
SubgroupsPositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegative
GWAS
Number211711211711350562350562
Genotypes (AA/AB/BB/missing)3/53/152/34/65/638/45/62/144/05/98/608/00/26/322/37/94/456/492/159/98/1102/233/226/1
MAF0.1400.0550.1690.0810.0410.0980.4980.394
OR (95% CI)2.79 (2.00‐3.90)2.28 (1.70‐3.06)0.40 (0.27‐0.59)1.53 (1.28–1.82)
P 4.83 × 10−10 2.49 × 10−8 1.86 × 10−6 2.64 × 10−6
Replication
Number218951230996414755436782
Genotypes (AA/AB/BB)5/69/1445/73/8737/75/14813/130/8535/38/3715/104/64691/216/129154/354/274
MAF0.1810.0440.1930.0780.0580.0750.4560.423
OR (95% CI)4.85 (3.49‐6.73)2.82 (2.13‐3.75)0.75 (0.53‐1.07)1.16 (0.98‐1.37)
P 4.25 × 10−21 1.14 × 10−13 0.110.08
Meta‐analysis
OR (95% CI)3.89 (3.05‐4.96)2.90 (2.34‐3.66)0.55 (0.42‐0.72)1.29 (1.15‐1.47)
P 5.78 × 10−28 3.27 × 10−22 1.71 × 10−5 3.96 × 10−5

Abbreviations: A1, minor allele; A2, major allele.

Manhattan and Q‐Q plots of anti‐gp210 and anti‐sp100 GWA results. (A) Manhattan plot of anti‐gp210‐GWA results; (B) Manhattan plot of anti‐sp100 GWA results; (C) Q‐Q plot of anti‐gp210‐GWA results; (D) Q‐Q plot of anti‐sp100 GWA results. (A,B) The horizontal axis shows genomic position, and the vertical axis shows the −log P values for association. The horizontal red line (P = 5 × 10−8) was set as the GWA significance threshold. (C,D) The red line is for null expectation, and the plot in blue is for P values including HLA SNPs, whereas the plot in black is for the P value after excluding SNPs in the MHC region. Genetic Association Analysis of Anti‐gp210 or Anti‐sp100 With GWAS Data in Han Chinese PBC P values are calculated based on a data set of 350 anti‐gp210‐positive and 562 anti‐gp210‐negative PBC cases. All SNPs in the chromosome 6 MHC region with P values < 1 × 10−5 are shown. P values are calculated based on a data set of 211 anti‐sp100‐positive and 711 anti‐sp100‐negative PBC cases. All SNPs in the chromosome 6 MHC region with P values < 1 × 10−7 are shown. Abbreviations: A1, minor allele; A2, major allele; UTR, untranslated region. Summary of ANA (Anti‐sp100 and Anti‐gp210) Association for Genotyped Variants in PBC Cohorts at Two‐Stage Study Abbreviations: A1, minor allele; A2, major allele.

GWA Analysis and Replication Study for ANTI‐sp100 Subphenotype

In total, 794,531 autosomal SNPs were analyzed between 211 anti‐sp100‐positive and 711 negative subjects. We observed a strong association in the HLA class II gene region, with six SNPs reaching genome‐wide significance (Fig. 1). The strongest association was also with rs1794280 (P = 4.83 × 10−10; OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.00‐3.90) but with the minor allele as the predisposing variant (Table 2). For the top nine SNPs with P < 1 × 10−7, we performed LD analysis and identified two independent LD groups (Supporting Fig. S2). The top SNPs from each group (rs1794280 and rs492899) were selected for replication using the additional 234 anti‐sp100‐positive and 1,018 negative subjects. In the replication study, both rs1794280 and rs492899 also showed significant associations with P = 4.25 × 10−21 (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 3.49‐6.73) and 1.14 × 10−13 (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.13‐3.75), respectively. Meta‐analysis using both data sets (445 anti‐sp100‐positive and 1,729 negative subjects in total) for rs1794280 and rs492899 showed P = 5.78 × 10−28 (OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 3.05‐4.96) and 3.27 × 10−22 (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.34‐3.66), respectively (Table 3). These results confirmed a strong association of HLA class II gene polymorphisms with the generation of sp100 autoantibody in PBC patients.

Imputation Analysis of HLA SNP, HLA Antigen Variants, and Classical HLA Alleles With sp100 Autoantibody

To further define the genetic basis of sp100 autoantibody production in the MHC region, we conducted imputation analysis using a Han‐MHC reference panel built by sequencing 10,689 healthy control Han Chinese subjects.24 Analysis using 211 anti‐sp100‐positive versus 711 negative subjects identified 46 SNPs, five AA variants, and four HLA alleles (one of two digits and three of four digits), all in the HLA class II gene region, reaching genome‐wide significance (Table 4; Supporting Table S3). Among the most significant SNPs, three (rs77689370, rs9269941, and rs67476479) were coding variants for the DRB1 gene.
Table 4

Summary of the Classic HLA Alleles and AA Polymorphisms Associated With Anti‐sp100

VariantsPosition (hg19)A1/A2Reference of A1 P OR (95% CI)Region
Anti‐sp100+Anti‐sp100−
SNP
rs179428032667171T/A0.1400.0515.98 × 10−10 3.00 (2.09‐4.31)Between DQB1 and DQA2
6‐3272373732723737−CC/A0.1110.0361.26 × 10−9 3.37 (2.23‐5.09) DQB2
rs11354732232206619T/G0.3130.1771.36 × 10−9 2.12 (1.66–2.72)Close to NOTCH4
rs926917332447188A/T0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29)Between DRA and DRB5
rs7768937032549563A/G0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
rs926994132551939T/G0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
rs6747647932551948P/A0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
HLA alleles
HLA_DRB1_03 32552064P/A0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
HLA_DRB1_0301 32552064P/A0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
HLA_DQA1_0102 32608306P/A0.3130.1828.10 × 10−9 2.04 (1.60–2.61) DQA1 noncoding
HLA_DQB1_0201 32631061P/A0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DQB1 noncoding
HLA_DPB1_03 33049368P/A0.1000.0391.32 × 10−6 2.70 (1.78‐4.09) DPB1 noncoding
HLA_DPB1_0301 33049368P/A0.1000.0391.32 × 10−6 2.70 (1.78‐4.09) DPB1 noncoding
AA polymorphisms
AA_DRβ1_77_3255193932551939N/T0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
AA_DRβ1_74_32551948_R32551948P/A0.1350.0501.51 × 10−9 2.97 (2.06‐4.29) DRB1 coding
AA_DQα1_207_32610462_M32610462P/A0.3130.1828.10 × 10−9 2.04 (1.60–2.61) DQA1 coding
AA_DQα1_207_32610462_V32610462A/P0.3130.1828.10 × 10−9 2.04 (1.60–2.61) DQA1 coding
AA_DRβ1_71_32551957_K32551957P/A0.1350.0541.87 × 10−8 2.73 (1.90‐3.92) DRB1 coding
AA_DRβ1_70_32551960_Q32551960P/A0.4100.2761.75 × 10−7 1.82 (1.45–2.28) DRB1 coding

Abbreviations: A1, effective allele; A2, alternative allele; A, absent; P, present.

Summary of the Classic HLA Alleles and AA Polymorphisms Associated With Anti‐sp100 Abbreviations: A1, effective allele; A2, alternative allele; A, absent; P, present. Strong associations with specific AAs corresponding to the key residues that distinguish the specific classical alleles were observed, including DRβ1‐AAs 77, 74, 71, and 70, located within the third hypervariable region (AAs 67‐74) on the alpha helix of the DRβ1 chain, where they directly interact with antigens presented to helper T cells (Fig. 2). The most associated AA was in DRβ1 at position 74 with the AA arginine and at position 77 with asparagine (N), having predisposing effects (P = 1.51 × 10−9; OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.06‐4.29). The strong association in DRβ1 was also found at position 71 with a lysine residue (P = 1.87 × 10−8; OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.90‐3.92) and at position 70, with a glutamine residue (P = 1.75 × 10−7; OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.45‐2.88). The strong predisposing effect was also observed in DQα1 at position 207 with the presence of the AA methionine (M) or absence of valine (V).
Figure 2

Three‐dimensional ribbon models for the HLA‐DR and HLA‐DP proteins associated with the production of anti‐sp100 autoantibodies. HLA‐DR and HLA‐DP protein structures were based on Protein Data Bank entries 3pdo and 3lqz with a direct view of the peptide‐binding groove, respectively, prepared using the program UCSF Chimera. AA positions identified by the association analysis are shown as spheres.

Three‐dimensional ribbon models for the HLA‐DR and HLA‐DP proteins associated with the production of anti‐sp100 autoantibodies. HLA‐DR and HLA‐DP protein structures were based on Protein Data Bank entries 3pdo and 3lqz with a direct view of the peptide‐binding groove, respectively, prepared using the program UCSF Chimera. AA positions identified by the association analysis are shown as spheres. Among 163 classical HLA alleles imputed, the strongest association was with DRB1*0301 (P = 1.51 × 10−9; OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.06‐4.29). DQB1*0201 is in complete LD with DRB1*0301 and DRβ1‐Arg74 and showed the identical signal. A strong association was also observed for DQA1*0102 (P = 8.10 × 10−9; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60‐2.61), which is in complete LD with DQα1‐Met207. A smaller signal (not in LD with DRB1*0301) was observed with DPB1*0301 (P = 1.32 × 10−6). A weak association was observed in the HLA‐B and HLA‐C alleles (P > 1 × 10−4). There was no association (P < 1 × 10−2) observed for the HLA‐A and HLA‐DPA1 alleles.

DRβ1‐Asn77/Arg74, DRβ1‐Ser37, and DPβ1‐Lys65 Were Major Determinants for sp100 Autoantibody

To further define the association of specific AAs within different HLA antigens and identify putative functional/causal variants, we first tested each AA within HLA‐DRβ1 using logistic regression analysis. Due to complete LD between DRβ1 Arg74 and Asn77 (r 2 = 1), we selected Asn77 for conditional analysis because the only polymorphic AA residues were Asn and Thr in the Han Chinese cohort. Conditioning on DRβ1‐AA77 eliminated the effects of DRβ1‐AAs 74, 71, and 70. The remaining association within DRβ1 was observed at AA position 37 with a serine residue (P = 6.87 × 10−4), located in the P9 peptide‐binding pockets. Further conditional analysis with both DRβ1‐Asn77 and Ser37 eliminated the effect within DRβ1 (Fig. 3A‐C; Supporting Figs. S3 and S4). Thus, DRβ1‐Asn77 (and/or Arg74) and Ser37 account for all of the observed associations within HLA‐DRβ1.
Figure 3

Conditional analysis of genotyped and imputed HLA SNPs, AAs, and classical alleles with anti‐sp100 subphenotype in the PBC GWA cohort. (A) Association results before conditional analysis, marked with AA77 in HLA‐DRβ1. (B) Conditional analyses controlling for HLA‐DRβ1 AA77 and AA37. (C) Conditional analysis by further controlling for HLA‐DPβ1 AA65. (D) Association results before conditional analysis, marked with DRB1*0301 in the DRB1 locus. (E) Conditional analysis by controlling for DRB1*0301, DRB1*1501, and DRB1*01. (F) Conditional analysis by further controlling for DPB1*0301.

Conditional analysis of genotyped and imputed HLA SNPs, AAs, and classical alleles with anti‐sp100 subphenotype in the PBC GWA cohort. (A) Association results before conditional analysis, marked with AA77 in HLA‐DRβ1. (B) Conditional analyses controlling for HLA‐DRβ1 AA77 and AA37. (C) Conditional analysis by further controlling for HLA‐DPβ1 AA65. (D) Association results before conditional analysis, marked with DRB1*0301 in the DRB1 locus. (E) Conditional analysis by controlling for DRB1*0301, DRB1*1501, and DRB1*01. (F) Conditional analysis by further controlling for DPB1*0301. After conditioning on DRβ1‐Asn77 and Ser37 in the MHC region, we only observed an association (P < 1 × 10−4) within the HLADPB1 region, with the strongest association coming from rs3128928 (P = 5.04 × 10−7) and DPβ1‐Lys65 (P = 4.21 × 10−6). Further conditioning on DPβ1‐Lys65 or rs3128928 eliminated all of the effects within the HLA‐DPβ1 region (Fig. 3A‐C; Supporting Fig. S3). These results indicate that DRβ1‐Asn77/Arg74, DRβ1‐Ser37, and DPβ1‐Lys65 were likely the major determinants for sp100 production. We note that there was a small residual signal at rs2442753 (P = 4.1 × 10−4) (Supporting Table S3) approximately 20 kb proximal to MHC class I–related chain A and within the intron of a putative noncoding RNA (LOC105379664).

Classical HLA‐DRB1*03:01, HLA‐DRB1*15:01, and HLA‐DRB1*01 Alleles and DPB1*03:01 Allele Can Explain the Differential Production of ANTI‐sp100 Antibody in PBC Cohorts

We also tried to further characterize the association of sp100 autoantibody with classical HLA alleles. Because the most significant associations were with HLA‐DRβ1 AAs (77, 74, 71, and 70) and alleles (DRB1*0301), we first performed stepwise regression conditioning on different DRB1 alleles as covariates within the DRB1 region. When conditioning on DRB1*03:01 (P = 1.51 × 10−9), the next most significant allele is DRB1*15:01 (P = 3.41 × 10−3; OR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.20‐2.47). When conditioning on DRB1*03:01 and DRB1*15:01, the remaining most associated allele is DRB1*01 (P = 3.38 × 10−3, OR = 3.52, 95% CI, 1.52‐8.16). Afterward, there is no significant association observed within the DRB1 region (Fig. 3D‐F; Supporting Table S3). These results indicated that there are three independent alleles for the sp100 autoantibody within the DRB1 region. After conditioning on these three alleles (DRB1*03:01, DRB1*15:01, and DRB1*01), the remaining signals (P < 1 × 10−4) within the MHC region only resided in the HLADPB1 region, peaked with SNP rs3128928 (P = 4.30 × 10−7; OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.80‐3.77) or the classical allele DPB1*03:01 (P = 7.01 × 10−6; OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.78‐4.36). Conditioning on a combination of DRB1 (*03:01, *15:01 and *01) and DPB1*03:01 alleles, we observed no significant residue signal remaining in the HLADPB1 region (Fig. 3F; Supporting Table S3). Similar to the AA results presented above, there was a small residual signal (P = 4.1 × 10−4) with rs2442753. These results clearly indicate that production of sp100 autoantibody can be mostly explained by a combination of risk alleles of DRB1 (*03:01, *15:01, and *01) and DPB1*03:01, with DRB1*03:01 possessing the major effect.

Discussion

A large‐scale GWA analysis conducted by our group indicated a strong genetic predisposition to PBC in Han Chinese.6 Here, we report a genetic study of PBC subphenotypes based on PBC‐specific ANAs against gp210 and sp100. A common feature in autoimmune diseases is the generation of high‐titer ANAs. Among the many ANAs identified so far, some are not disease‐specific, existing in many different autoimmune diseases and even some cancers, lung diseases, and infectious diseases; but there are also disease‐specific ANAs. ANAs to gp210 and sp100 are two autoantibodies highly specific to PBC.10 Several GWA studies in different autoimmune diseases have identified significant associations of different ANAs with specific polymorphisms and classical HLA alleles.28, 29, 30 Previously, two studies investigated the association of specific HLA class I and II alleles with ANAs in PBC, but these studies have been confined to small sample sets and limited HLA alleles.31, 32 The results presented in this report also have merits over previous reported imputations in other HLA fine‐mapping studies. The first lies in the population‐specific gene chips used in GWA with 7,889 markers in the MHC region included on the Illumina HumanOmniZhongHua‐8 BeadChip. The second is the Han Chinese–specific MHC panel generated by deep sequencing of 10,689 Han Chinese individuals.24 Therefore, we were able to perform the association analysis during the GWA stage using a large number of SNPs (including population‐specific SNPs) in the MHC region and apply these SNPs in accurate imputation of the remaining SNPs, AA variation in HLA antigens, and classical HLA alleles. In this study, we observed striking differences in the association of genetic predisposition of two PBC‐specific ANAs to gp210 and sp100. A highly significant association was only observed with sp100 autoantibody but not with gp210. Anti‐gp210 antibody in PBC patients recognizes a single epitope within a 15‐AA stretch in the carboxyl terminus of gp210, a member of the nuclear pore complex that regulates the flow of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.33, 34, 35 The mechanism of generation of anti‐gp210 antibody is still a matter of debate and could arise by molecular mimicry of the Escherichia coli mutY gene product containing a similar antigenic determinant or by abnormal expression of gp210 in patients with PBC.33 A lack of association in HLA polymorphism with gp210 autoantibody may not support the notion of a molecular mimic of external bacterial protein epitopes in the generation of the gp210 autoantibody because this requires extended processing of bacterial protein fragments and presentation by antigen‐presenting cells and T cells. The autoimmune target of anti‐sp100 is the sp100 nuclear antigen, a major component of PMLsp100 nuclear bodies. Different from anti‐gp210, sp100 autoantibody in PBC patients recognized multiple epitopes, including linear and conformational epitopes.36 Two major linear epitope sequences recognized by anti‐sp100 share sequence similarities with several viral proteins found in the Epstein‐Barr virus protein sequences.37 In our analysis, we found HLA‐DRβ1‐Asn77/Arg74, DRβ1‐Ser37, and HLA‐DPβ1‐Lys65 associated with the sp100 autoantibody. All of these AAs locate within the peptide‐binding grooves, which imply a functional impact of sp100 epitope presentation in autoantibody production. Therefore, our results may suggest significantly different mechanisms in the pathogenesis of two subphenotypes associated with ANAs to sp100 and gp210. The HLA association for anti‐sp100 autoantibody indicates that anti‐sp100 production is an adoptive immune response and T cell–dependent. The lack of specific HLA association for anti‐gp210 may suggest a T cell–independent response. Our data show that although the sp100 autoantibody is highly specific to PBC, genotypes in HLA genes that are most strongly associated with sp100 autoantibody are not the same as those associated with PBC disease per se (Supporting Table S2). Indeed, this is also true for HLA antigens and AAs; HLADRB1*08:03, HLADRB1*07:01, and DPB1*17:01 are the major predisposing alleles for PBC (manuscript in preparation). One speculative explanation for these surprising discrepancies is that HLADRB1*08:03, HLADRB1*07:01, and DPB1*17:01 may present specific mitochondrial antigens that are critical for disease susceptibility, whereas these HLA antigens do not preferentially present either sp100 or gp210. AMA‐M2 autoantibodies (pathognomonic for PBC) recognize multiple different proteins, mainly the E2 subunits of the 2‐oxo‐acid dehydrogenase complex (ODGC) including pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, 2‐oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, and branched‐chain 2‐oxoacid dehydrogenase complex, with, to a less extent, the E1 and E3 subunits of ODGC. Therefore, HLADRB1*08:03, HLADRB1*07:01, and DPB1*17:01 may highly predispose for PBC but have very little effect on positivity for gp210 and sp100. A potential limitation in our study lies in the measurement of both antibodies only at a single time point at or after diagnosis for more than half of our PBC cases. There were reports that change of anti‐sp100 titers has been found during the course of the treatment, but conversion of anti‐sp100 positivity was rarely found.19 But conversion of anti‐gp210 positivity was reported in some of the patients treated with UDCA in Nakamura et al.'s study of Japanese PBC cohort, although this report was not confirmed by other studies.38 This conversion during the treatment may increase the false‐negative rate in the study cohort, which may reduce the power of our study to detect a genetic association for anti‐gp210. However, this may not be a critical factor in the lack of association observed in our gp210 groups because both of our GWA and replication cohorts exhibit significantly higher anti‐gp210‐positive rates compared with the study by Nakamura et al. (38.4% and 35.5% versus 26.1%). At the same time, the sample size (930 GWA and 1,252 replication samples) in the current study should provide sufficient power to detect genetic associations. We also note that the current study is confined to PBC patients in the Han Chinese population. Additional studies will be necessary to ascertain whether the association of sp100 to particular HLA antigens and amino acids found in our study is also present in other populations. As reviewed at the beginning of this article, the clinical significance of anti‐sp100 and anti‐gp210 is uncertain.8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 Further studies will be needed to determine if PBC disease progression, endophenotypes, and, importantly, responses to different therapeutic regimens are associated with the presence or titers of these autoantibodies. We also note that in future PBC studies it may be useful not only to stratify patient groups based on variants that predispose to PBC itself but also to examine whether stratification based on the HLA associations of sp100 are associated with particular endophenotypes or therapeutic responses. In summary, the current study addressed genetic determinants associated with sp100 and gp210 autoantibody subphenotypes in PBC and identified specific SNPs, HLA alleles, and AAs associated with the sp100 autoantibody but not with the gp210 autoantibody. The striking difference in genetic predisposition observed between the sp100 and gp210 subphenotypes may indicate distinct roles of these two autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of PBC. Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  Correlation of initial autoantibody profile and clinical outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Józefa Wesierska-Gadek; Edward Penner; Pier Maria Battezzati; Carlo Selmi; Massimo Zuin; Eva Hitchman; Howard J Worman; M Eric Gershwin; Mauro Podda; Pietro Invernizzi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Antinuclear antibodies specific for primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Howard J Worman; Jean Claude Courvalin
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.754

3.  Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.

Authors:  J C Barrett; B Fry; J Maller; M J Daly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Antibody titer to gp210-C terminal peptide as a clinical parameter for monitoring primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Minoru Nakamura; Yuki Shimizu-Yoshida; Yasushi Takii; Atsumasa Komori; Terufumi Yokoyama; Toshihito Ueki; Manabu Daikoku; Koji Yano; Takehiro Matsumoto; Kiyoshi Migita; Hiroshi Yatsuhashi; Masahiro Ito; Naohiko Masaki; Hiroshi Adachi; Yukio Watanabe; Yoko Nakamura; Takeo Saoshiro; Takeshi Sodeyama; Michiaki Koga; Shinji Shimoda; Hiromi Ishibashi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  The nuclear dot protein sp100, characterization of domains necessary for dimerization, subcellular localization, and modification by small ubiquitin-like modifiers.

Authors:  T Sternsdorf; K Jensen; B Reich; H Will
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Anti-gp210 and anti-centromere antibodies are different risk factors for the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Minoru Nakamura; Hisayoshi Kondo; Tsuyoshi Mori; Atsumasa Komori; Mutsumi Matsuyama; Masahiro Ito; Yasushi Takii; Makiko Koyabu; Terufumi Yokoyama; Kiyoshi Migita; Manabu Daikoku; Seigo Abiru; Hiroshi Yatsuhashi; Eiichi Takezaki; Naohiko Masaki; Kazuhiro Sugi; Koichi Honda; Hiroshi Adachi; Hidehiro Nishi; Yukio Watanabe; Yoko Nakamura; Masaaki Shimada; Tatsuji Komatsu; Akira Saito; Takeo Saoshiro; Hideharu Harada; Takeshi Sodeyama; Shigeki Hayashi; Akihide Masumoto; Takehiro Sando; Tetsuo Yamamoto; Hironori Sakai; Masakazu Kobayashi; Toyokichi Muro; Michiaki Koga; Zakera Shums; Gary L Norman; Hiromi Ishibashi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Characterization and clinical impact of antinuclear antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Paolo Muratori; Luigi Muratori; Rodolfo Ferrari; Fabio Cassani; Giampaolo Bianchi; Marco Lenzi; Luis Rodrigo; Antonio Linares; Dolores Fuentes; Francesco B Bianchi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Autoantibodies to the nuclear Sp100 protein in primary biliary cirrhosis and associated diseases: epitope specificity and immunoglobulin class distribution.

Authors:  C Szostecki; H Will; H J Netter; H H Guldner
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  10 in total

1.  The similarity of class II HLA genotypes defines patterns of autoreactivity in idiopathic bone marrow failure disorders.

Authors:  Simona Pagliuca; Carmelo Gurnari; Hassan Awada; Ashwin Kishtagari; Sunisa Kongkiatkamon; Laila Terkawi; Misam Zawit; Yihong Guan; Thomas LaFramboise; Babal K Jha; Bhumika J Patel; Betty K Hamilton; Navneet S Majhail; Sofie Lundgren; Satu Mustjoki; Yogen Saunthararajah; Valeria Visconte; Timothy A Chan; Chao-Yie Yang; Tobias L Lenz; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 25.476

2.  Diagnostic and Clinical Value of Specific Autoantibodies against Kelch-like 12 Peptide and Nuclear Envelope Proteins in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Authors:  Alicja Bauer; Andrzej Habior; Damian Gawel
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Clinical impact of antibodies to Sp100 on a bacterial infection in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Takashi Himoto; Shuhei Yamamoto; Kaho Morimoto; Satoshi Tada; Shima Mimura; Koji Fujita; Joji Tani; Asahiro Morishita; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Concentration of Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Authors:  Alicja Bauer; Andrzej Habior
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 5.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Regulate Hepatic Immunity and Assist in the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Authors:  Chang Wang; Ying Shi; Xiaomei Wang; Heming Ma; Quan Liu; Yanhang Gao; Junqi Niu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  New insights on the role of human leukocyte antigen complex in primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Giacomo Mulinacci; Andrea Palermo; Alessio Gerussi; Rosanna Asselta; Merrill Eric Gershwin; Pietro Invernizzi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 8.786

7.  Changes of Serum IgG Glycosylation Patterns in Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients.

Authors:  Xiaoli Zeng; Siting Li; Shiyi Tang; Xi Li; Guoyuan Zhang; Mengtao Li; Xiaofeng Zeng; Chaojun Hu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Analysis of Autoantibodies against Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Body Components and Biochemical Parameters in Sera of Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Authors:  Alicja Bauer; Andrzej Habior; Paulina Wieszczy; Damian Gawel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24

9.  APASL clinical practice guidance: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Hong You; Xiong Ma; Cumali Efe; Guiqiang Wang; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Kazumichi Abe; Weijia Duan; Sha Chen; Yuanyuan Kong; Dong Zhang; Lai Wei; Fu-Sheng Wang; Han-Chieh Lin; Jin Mo Yang; Tawesak Tanwandee; Rino A Gani; Diana A Payawal; Barjesh C Sharma; Jinlin Hou; Osamu Yokosuka; A Kadir Dokmeci; Darrell Crawford; Jia-Horng Kao; Teerha Piratvisuth; Dong Jin Suh; Laurentius A Lesmana; Jose Sollano; George Lau; Shiv K Sarin; Masao Omata; Atsushi Tanaka; Jidong Jia
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Human Leukocyte Antigen Association Study Reveals DRB1*04:02 Effects Additional to DRB1*07:01 in Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis.

Authors:  Vicente Peris Sempere; Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo; Aditya Ambati; Sophie Binks; Anne-Laurie Pinto; Veronique Rogemond; Sean J Pittock; Divyanshu Dubey; Michael D Geschwind; Jeffrey Marc Gelfand; Sonam Dilwali; Soon-Tae Lee; Julian Knight; Katherine S Elliott; Sarosh Irani; Jérôme Honnorat; Emmanuel Mignot
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2022-02-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.