| Literature DB >> 30854338 |
Stefania Maria Marotta1, Filippo Giarratana1, Anastasia Calvagna1, Graziella Ziino1, Alessandro Giuffrida1, Antonio Panebianco1.
Abstract
Domestic environment, in particular, kitchen setting is a well-established source of microbial contamination. Kitchen sponges represent an important vehicle of microbial transmission and maintenance of spoilage bacteria and pathogenic strains responsible for food borne diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbial communities of 100 'in-use' kitchen sponges, improving the knowledge on their role in cross-contamination in domestic environment and transmission of ESBLproducing strains. Sponges were processed for: aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB), Enterobacteriaceae (EB), yeasts and molds (YM), coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS), micrococci (MCC), anaerobic sulfite reducing bacteria (ASR), and for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica. A total of 309 enterobacteria strains were identified and then processed for ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase) phenotypical expression. A high contamination level of kitchen sponges was observed (mean value AMB 8.25±1.1; EB 5.89±1.2; YM 5.57±1.1; MCC 4.82±0.1 log CFU/g). Identified enterobacteria strains revealed several opportunistic and pathogenic agents such as Enterobacter cloacae (28%), Citrobacter freundii (23.3%), Cronobacter sakazakii (14.6%) and other strains in lower percentage. Listeria monocytogenes was found in only one sponge (1%). A total of 69 (22.3%) enterobacteria resulted ESBL+, with the following prevalence: P. rettgeri (50%), L. adenocarboxilata (30%), K. pneumoniae (25%), K. oxytoca (25%), C. sakazakii (20%), E. cloacae (20.7%), C. freundii (20.1%). Results confirm the potential role of kitchen sponges as vehicle for food-borne pathogens such as, C. sakazakii for the first time, infectious agents and spoilage microorganisms. The observed high contamination level and the presence of several ESBLs opportunistic pathogens, stresses the necessity to improve a proper education of the consumers on the effective treatment to reduce their microbial loads.Entities:
Keywords: Cronobacter sakazakii; ESBL producing bacteria; enterobacteria; kitchen sponges; microbiology
Year: 2019 PMID: 30854338 PMCID: PMC6379783 DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2018.7672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Food Saf ISSN: 2239-7132
Sample distribution on macroscopic observations scoring.
| Parameter | Score, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Consumption | 17.0 | 43.0 | 40.0 |
| Dirt | 14.0 | 52.0 | 34.0 |
| Food debris/Extraneous materials | 55.0 | 30.0 | 15.0 |
Consumption: (1) like new; (2) normal consumption; (3) excessive consumption. Dirt: (1) like new; (2) slight color change; (3) intensive blackening. Food debris/extraneous particles: (1) from 0 to 2 units; (2) from 3 to 5 units; (3) more than 5 units.
Microbiological loads and prevalence in kitchen sponges.
| Parameter | log CFU/g | Prevalence,% |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic mesophilic bacteria count | 8.25±1.1 | 100 |
| 5.89±1.2 | 100 | |
| Micrococci | 4.82±1.1 | 100 |
| Yeasts and Molds count | 5.57±1.2 | 100 |
| Coagulase-positive staphylococci | 3.29±0.4 | 11.0 |
| Anaerobic sulfite reducing bacteria count | 1.68±0.8 | 11.0 |
| + | 1.0 | |
| Salmonella spp. | - | 0 |
| - | 0 |
+ detected; - not detected.
Figure 1.Distribution of Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria (AMB), Enterobacteriaceae (EB), Micrococci (MCC), Yeast and Mold (YM) loads in 100 kitchen sponges.
Figure 2.Linear regression scatter plots, trend lines and R2 values, relating: A) Enterobacteriaceae count (EB) to Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria count (AMB); B) Micrococci count (MCC) to Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria count (AMB); C) Yeast and Mold count (YM) to Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria count (AMB).
Figure 3.Prevalence of ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase) strains among 309 identified Enterobacteriaceae.