Literature DB >> 30854285

Function-Altering Effects of Rule Phrasing in the Modulation of Instructional Control.

Amy J Henley1, Jason M Hirst1,2, Florence D DiGennaro Reed1, Amel Becirevic1, Derek D Reed1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of four instructional variants on instruction following under changing reinforcement schedules using an operant task based on Hackenberg and Joker's Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 367-383 (1994) experimental preparation. Sixteen college-aged adults served as participants and were randomly assigned to one of four instruction conditions (directive, generic, non-directive, and control). Results suggest textual verbal behavior modulated instruction following. Specifically, directive and generic instructions produced greater levels of instructional control and relatively lower levels of schedule control compared to non-directive instructions. Thus, participants in the directive and generic groups responded in accordance with the instructions even when schedules of reinforcement favored deviation from the instructed pattern. In contrast, participants in the non-directive group responded toward the optimal pattern. In the control condition, participant responding was variable but toward the optimal pattern. Findings are interpreted within the framework of Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior and formulation of rule governance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult humans; Fixed-time schedules; Instructional control; Progressive-time schedules; Rule-governed behavior; Schedule control; Verbal behavior

Year:  2016        PMID: 30854285      PMCID: PMC6387751          DOI: 10.1007/s40616-016-0063-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav        ISSN: 0889-9401


  21 in total

1.  Effects of instructions and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; A Kaufman; K A Stauber
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies.

Authors:  E Shimoff; A C Catania; B A Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior.

Authors:  M E Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The establishment of stimulus control by instructions and by differential reinforcement.

Authors:  J S Danforth; P N Chase; M Dolan; J H Joyce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding.

Authors:  S C Hayes; A J Brownstein; R D Zettle; I Rosenfarb; Z Korn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior.

Authors:  S C Hayes; A J Brownstein; J R Haas; D E Greenway
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies.

Authors:  E Shimoff; B A Matthews; A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  What is the experimental analysis of behavior?

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance.

Authors:  M Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaptation to changing contingencies in children with adhd.

Authors:  David E Bicard; Nancy A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.