Literature DB >> 30854152

Possible Role of Court-Type Thai Traditional Massage During Parturition: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Panya Sananpanichkul1, Chatchai Sawadhichai2, Yosapon Leaungsomnapa3, Paweena Yapanya4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Court-type Thai traditional Massage (c-TTM) applied during intrapartum may have some benefit other than pain relief. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of c-TTM during the first and second stage of labor, as well as pain alleviation in the first stage.
METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial study. Eligible participants were singleton pregnant mothers with cervical dilation between 3-5 cm and no medical complications. Both trial groups received the same routine antepartum care except for 1 hour additional c-TTM given to the experimental group when they were in the active phase of labor. The pain score was taken from the participants at the time before labor pains started, at the time of active labor, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the intervention. Pain was recorded by the researcher using a visual analog scale. The primary outcome during the first and second stages of labor was compared between groups. Pain relief during the first stage of labor and analgesic drugs used were compared as a secondary outcome. This trial is registered under the identification number TCTR20171115003.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine participants were enrolled and randomly assigned with 1:1 allocation to groups. The duration of first and second stage labor was significantly shorter in the experimental c-TTM than in the conventional control group (mean ± SD: 198.37 ± 62.80 minutes: 268.52 ± 137.81 minutes, p value =.02 and 17.54 ± 9.49 minutes: 23.35 ± 15.01 minutes, p value =.03, respectively). There was no difference of pain score between the groups.
CONCLUSION: One hour of c-TTM can significantly decrease the duration of the first and second stages of labor. The pain score recorded is not statistically different between the groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thai massage; intrapartum; labor pain; nonpharmacological pain relief

Year:  2019        PMID: 30854152      PMCID: PMC6398988     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork


INTRODUCTION

Labor pain is still one of the obstacles for mothers who wish to try vaginal delivery. When the cervix is fully dilated, effective regular uterine contraction at appropriate intervals and expulsive maternal forces bring about delivery of the baby.( However, every time the uterus contracts, it brings about pain, anxiety, stress, and fear to the mother. Some mothers display behavior changes, such as irritability, agitation, anger, grimaces, moans, and cries for help every time the uterus contracts. These result in the change of biochemical substances in the body. Consequently, the sympathetic nervous system (SMS) is stimulated and releases catecholamine and epinephrine. These increase pain perception in the brain and decrease uterine contraction by blocking the release of oxytocin from the posterior pituitary.( Stress also increases cortisol hormone secretion, resulting in decreased blood supply to the uterus, and finally causes the uncoordinated myometrial contraction or protraction of labor. Analgesia given during the intrapartum period is not only for somatic therapy but also for psychological therapy. Pharmacological approaches aim to decrease or eliminate the physical sensation of labor pain. By contrast, nonpharmacological approaches are mainly to increase comfort, help the laboring woman to cope with the pain and decrease suffering.( The International Society for the Study of Pain describes pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage”.( Both uterine contraction and perineal pressure contribute to the pain experienced during labor. Uterine pain is typically transmitted via nerve roots T10 to L1, and perineal sensation is transmitted through nerve roots S2 to S4.( In theory, massage creates a stimulus via myelinated nerve fibers that interferes with the transmission of pain to the dorsal root ganglia, effectively “closing the gate” to the reception of pain.( It is suggested that massage stimulates the release of endorphins and increases serotonin levels to inhibit the transmission of noxious nerve signals to the brain.( Consequently, the benefits of intrapartum massage are a decrease in labor pain and anxiety level, shorter duration of labor,( and reduction of maternal depression in the prenatal period that results in greater gestational age and higher neonatal birthweight.( Traditional Thai massage, a precious knowledge-system of Thailand, has been passed from generation to generation. It is believed that traditional Thai massage originated within families as family members offered relief to one another by using various parts of their body to relieve muscle pain. This type of massage is called Cha Loei Sak, or ‘unofficial massage’. ‘Official massage’ is performed using both hands and no other parts of the body. This is also known as court-type massage.( This investigation aims to study the effectiveness of court-type Thai traditional massage (c-TTM) in decreasing the duration of the first and second stages of labor, as well as pain alleviation in the first stage of labor.

METHODS & MATERIALS

Study Design

This study was an open-label, randomized controlled trial done between December 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018. Ethical approval was received from Chanthaburi Research Ethics Committee (COA number CTIREC 076), and the trial was registered to the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on November 14, 2017 (TCTR 20171115003).

Participants

Eligible participants were pregnant Thai woman who regularly attended antenatal care clinics. They were singleton pregnancies (37–41 completed weeks) with cephalic presentation, spontaneous labor pain with cervical dilation between 3–5 centimeters (first stage of labor), no medical complications, and willing to cooperate in the research. Exclusion criteria were multifetal pregnancy, previous cesarean section, abnormal uterine bleeding, and pre-existing medical complications such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes.

Randomization and Masking

A randomized block design was employed during this experiment with 1:1 allocation. A web-based, computer-generated randomization sequence was prepared via the ‘Sealed Envelope’ website (https://www.sealedenvelope.com). The numbered opaque envelopes prepared by the researcher were opened directly after interview to reveal the allocation group.

Procedure

Participants who met the inclusion criteria were informed of the study process by nurse and informed consent was obtained immediately after recruitment. The privacy rights of human subjects were always respected. The participants were then randomized using a 1:1 randomization ratio into two groups (the experimental group and the control group). Both groups were treated with routine antepartum care, while the study group received an hour of c-TTM from one licensed Thai traditional practitioner. Routine antepartum care was based on clinical practice guidelines of the institute. The pregnant women were assessed every 2 hrs, which included monitoring vital signs and fetal heart rate, as well as pelvic examination to evaluate the progression of labor.( Only one dosage of pethidine (25 mg.) was given intravenously for each participant upon request when there was a pain score of more than 8. Baseline characteristics such as age, parity, gestational age, education, residency, monthly income, height, and weight were recorded. Pain score was calculated using the visual analog scale (VAS), and was recorded by the researcher before labor pain started, at the time of active labor, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hrs after the intervention. In the c-TTM experimental group, the practitioner pressed and kneaded along designated lines (“sen”) and points of the body. The exception was for the abdomen, especially the uterus. The intensity of force was adjusted according to the sensitivity of muscle resistance. The practitioner usually pressed with soft and gentle pressure, holding down for a moment at each point on the body. The practitioner moved from one point to the next at intervals of 10–15 s.( The details of the body lines are described below.( The “leg line” is divided into upper and lower sections. The practitioner starts from the upper section (thigh) to the lower part (ankle). The patient lies in a lateral recumbent position while the practitioner is behind on the bedside. The “back line” starts from the waist or lower back along one side of the spine to the level of the neck. The practitioner circularly kneads behind the patient’s back and continues even if the uterus has contracted.( Then, the practitioner will press along the coccyx, sacrum and hip. The “shoulder line” is the line starting from the inner scapula and moving along the vertebra line. The “arm line” is separated into the outer and inner arm, and includes the palm. For all the lines mentioned above, the practitioner pressed for 5 rounds per line and continued to knead according to the patient’s request. However, the time of c-TTM was strictly limited to 1 hr.

Statistical Analysis

The sample size was calculated based on data from Silva Gallo et al.( The χ2 and t tests were used for univariate analysis of categorical and continuous data, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare when the dependent variable was either ordinal or continuous, but not normally distributed. Significance was set at as α of 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS V. 22 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0).

RESULTS

A total of 645 women were eligible for the study, of whom 586 were excluded. The exclusion was due to previous cesarean section (246), preterm labor (55), nonvertex presentation (25), twin pregnancy (2), medical complication (69), non-Thai (11), inappropriate dilation of cervix (144), and no willingness to participate (34), as shown in Figure 1. Fifty-nine participants were included in the study. The demographic character of the participants is shown in Table 1.
Figure 1

Consort flow diagram. F/E = forcepts extraction; C/S = Cesarean section.

Table 1

General Demographic Characteristic of the Population

VariableTotal (n=59)Control (n=29)Massage (n=30)p value
Age (y), median (IQR)24 (20–29)24 (20–28)24 (22.8–29.3).99a
 Teenage6 (10.2)3 (10.3)3 (10.0)
 Normal age49 83.1)24 (82.8)25 (83.3)
 Advance age4 (6.8)2 (6.9)2 (6.7)
Body Mass Index.51
 Normal weight35 (59.3)15 (51.7)20 (66.7)
 Underweight12 (20.3)7 (24.1)5 (16.7)
 Overweight, Obesity12 (20.3)7 (24.1)5 (16.7)
Residency.24
 Urban26 (44.1)15 (51.7)11 (36.7)
 Rural33 (55.9)14 (48.3)19 (63.3)
Occupation59.79
 Housewife/student23 (39.0)11 (37.9)12 (40.0)
 Trader/Agriculture16 (27.1)7 (24.1)9 (30.0)
 Employee20 (33.9)11 (37.9)9 (30.0)
Income (Baht/month).71
 <15,00036 (61.0)17 (58.6)19 (63.3)
 >15,00023 (39.0)12 (41.4)11 (36.7)
Education.68
 Below Bachelor’s Degree33 (55.9)17 (58.6)16 (53.3)
 Bachelor’s Degree or higher26 (44.1)12 (41.4)14 (46.7)
Parity.92
 Nulliparous37 (62.7)18 (62.1)19 (63.3)
Gestational age, week, mean±SD38.9±1.139.17± 1.0738.67± 1.15.12b
Expectation of labor pain score (median (IQR))7(5–9)7(6–8)7(5–10).57a
Pain score-real (median (IQR))9(8–10)9(7–10)10(8–10).09a

Mann-Whitney U test

t test

Teenage = ≤ 19 years old; Normal age = 20–34 years old; Advance age = xx>35 years old; Body mass index: Underweight = <18.5, Normal weight = 18.5–24.9, Overweight, Obesity = >25.0.

Consort flow diagram. F/E = forcepts extraction; C/S = Cesarean section. General Demographic Characteristic of the Population Mann-Whitney U test t test Teenage = ≤ 19 years old; Normal age = 20–34 years old; Advance age = xx>35 years old; Body mass index: Underweight = <18.5, Normal weight = 18.5–24.9, Overweight, Obesity = >25.0. The duration of the first and second stages of labor was significantly shorter in the c-TTM experimental group than in the control group (mean ± SD: 198.37 ± 62.80 min: 268.52 ± 137.81 min, p value = .02 and 17.54 ± 9.49 min: 23.35 ± 15.01 min, p value = .03; respectively) (Table 2). There was no statistical difference of pain score during the intrapartum period between the groups, as shown in Table 3. Analgesic drugs were used less during the first stage of labor in the c-TTM experimental group than in the control group, but there was no statistical significance (14 (46.7%) and 18 (69.2%), p value = .09) (Table 2). The study showed that pregnant woman suffered from greater labor pain than they expected in both control and massage groups (expectation: experience; 7:9; 7:10; respectively) (Table 3).
Table 2

Intrapartum Characteristics

VariableControl (n=29)Massage (n=30)p value
Analgesic drug use (n, (%)) (25mg Pethidine/participant)18 (62.1)14 (46.7).09
Oxytocin use (n, (%))18 (62.1)20 (66.7).71
Oxytocin used-mIU (median (IQR))260 (0–1500)450 (0–737).82a
Route of delivery (n, (%)).79
 -Normal vagina24 (82.8)24 (80.0)
 -Non-Vaginal delivery5 (17.2)6 (20.0)
Perineal tear (n, (%)).61
 -Second degree23 (79.3)23 (76.7)
Estimate blood loss (ml, median (IQR))250 (200–350)200 (200–300).33a
First stage (mean±SD, min)268.52±137.81198.37±62.80.02b
Second stage (mean±SD, min)23.35±15.0117.54±9.49.03b
Neonatal birthweight (g, median (IQR))3180 (2760–3390)2945 (2625–3292).07a
Fetal asphyxia (n)000

Mann-Whitney U test

t test

Table 3

Pain Score in First Stage of Labor

Pain scoreControl groupMassage groupp value


n(median (IQR))n(median (IQR))
Expectation297 (6–8)307 (5–10).57
Experience299 (7–10)3010 (8–10).09
At start298 (5–8)307 (5–8.25).89
At 1st hour298 (6–9)307 (4.75–9).25
At 2nd hour279 (7–10)308 (6–10).59
At 3rd hour209 (6.25–10)248 (7–10).63
At 4th hour138 (7.5–10)198 (7–10).94
Intrapartum Characteristics Mann-Whitney U test t test Pain Score in First Stage of Labor

DISCUSSION

Massage with soft force along the shoulder, waist, hip, arm, hand, and leg can relieve pain during the second stage of labor.( Mortazavi et al.( studied 120 primiparous women and showed lower pain in the first and second stages of labor accompanied by a shorter duration of the active phase of labor in the experimental massage group. In all previous studies, massage or touch was applied to the pregnant woman at regular intervals in the first stage and/or in the second stage. This is a different procedure from the present study because c-TTM was applied only once in the active phase of labor. The data from this investigation do not show a decrease in the pain score of the massage group. Although pain score evaluation in the experimental group was not statistically different to the control group, the duration of the first and second stages of labor were significantly shorter in the c-TTM group. This supports the studies of Lund et al.( and Turner et al.,( who argued that one massage session stimulates oxytocin release from the neurohypophysis and repeated massage sessions stimulate an increase in pain threshold that seems to be mediated by an interaction between oxytocin and opioid neurons. Analgesic drugs were also used less in the c-TTM experimental group than in the control group, though this was not statistically significant. In future experiments, researchers should consider how long the effect from c-TTM lasts. The global rate of cesarean section is about 19%. It ranges from 6% to 27% from the least to more developed regions, respectively.( In Thailand, the rate of cesarean section increases every year, ranging from 15.2% (1990) to 22.4% (1996) to 34% (2007) and 34.8% in 2009.( There is no evidence to support the benefits for women or infants of cesarean section performed with no indication. A systematic review in 2015 concluded that a cesarean section rate higher than 10% was not associated with reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality rate.( One of the maternal reasons to choose elective operative delivery is avoidance of labor pain. This study showed that pregnant women suffered from greater labor pain than they expected. The c-TTM may be a form of complementary treatment added to the routine care package in order to alleviate pain and decrease the number of requested cesarean sections. This is supported by the fact that fewer analgesics were used in the c-TTM group, although this was not statistically significant. The limitation of this study is the small sample size. Most of the pain scores reported in this paper relied on self-report measures, which may cause some error. As in many other countries, pregnant women have limited insurance coverage for this complementary therapy. The Thai Ministry of Health still does not support c-TTM as part of the national health program.

CONCLUSION

One hour of c-TTM can significantly decrease the duration of the first and second stages of labor, thus decreasing the potential duration of suffering from labor pain. Moreover, a decrease in the number of analgesic drugs used in first stage of labor was observed in the experimental c-TTM group, although there was no statistical difference. Promotion of 1 hr of c-TTM to target groups of pregnant women may be used as one strategy to decrease the rate of cesarean sections.
  21 in total

1.  Effective techniques for massage in labour.

Authors:  L Kimber
Journal:  Pract Midwife       Date:  1998-04

2.  High- versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation.

Authors:  A J Satin; K J Leveno; M L Sherman; D S Brewster; F G Cunningham
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  How to implement complementary therapies for laboring women.

Authors:  Elaine Zwelling; Kitti Johnson; Jonell Allen
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.412

4.  Does regular massage from late pregnancy to birth decrease maternal pain perception during labour and birth?--A feasibility study to investigate a programme of massage, controlled breathing and visualization, from 36 weeks of pregnancy until birth.

Authors:  Mary T Mc Nabb; Linda Kimber; Anne Haines; Christine McCourt
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.446

5.  Preliminary research on plasma oxytocin in normal cycling women: investigating emotion and interpersonal distress.

Authors:  R A Turner; M Altemus; T Enos; B Cooper; T McGuinness
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.458

6.  A comparison of massage effects on labor pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Mei-Yueh Chang; Chung-Hey Chen; Kuo-Feng Huang
Journal:  J Nurs Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.682

7.  Effects of massage on pain and anxiety during labour: a randomized controlled trial in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Yueh Chang; Shing-Yaw Wang; Chung-Hey Chen
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Repeated massage-like stimulation induces long-term effects on nociception: contribution of oxytocinergic mechanisms.

Authors:  Iréne Lund; Y Ge; Long-Chuan Yu; Kerstin Uvnas-Moberg; Jing Wang; Cheng Yu; Mieko Kurosawa; Greta Agren; Annika Rosén; Magnus Lekman; Thomas Lundeberg
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes.

Authors:  Mario R Festin; Malinee Laopaiboon; Porjai Pattanittum; Melissa R Ewens; David J Henderson-Smart; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Transition to parenthood: the needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood.

Authors:  Toity Deave; Debbie Johnson; Jenny Ingram
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  1 in total

1.  Myofascial Pain Syndrome Focused on the Upper Trapezius Muscle: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial of the Court-Type Traditional Thai Massage versus the Thai Hermit.

Authors:  Jurairat Boonruab; Phiyaphon Poonsuk; Watchara Damjuti; Wichit Supamethangkura
Journal:  J Evid Based Integr Med       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.