Literature DB >> 30854123

Cloning and characterization of the putative AFAP1-AS1 promoter region.

Fang Wei1,2,3, Yi-Zhou Jing2, Yi He2,4, Yan-Yan Tang2,4, Li-Ting Yang2, Ying-Fen Wu2, Le Tang2, Lei Shi2, Zhao-Jian Gong2, Can Guo2, Ming Zhou1,2,3, Bo Xiang1,2,3, Xiao-Ling Li1,2,3, Yong Li2,5, Gui-Yuan Li1,2,3, Wei Xiong1,2,3, Zhao-Yang Zeng1,2,3, Fang Xiong1.   

Abstract

Actin filament-associated protein 1-antisense RNA1 (AFAP1-AS1), a cancer-related long non-coding RNA, has been found to be upregulated in multiple types of cancers. AFAP1-AS1 is important for the initiation, progression and poor prognosis of many cancers, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of AFAP1-AS1 expression is not well-understood. In our study, the potential promoter region of AFAP1-AS1 was predicted by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. Moreover, promoter deletion analysis identified the sequence between positions -359 and -28 bp as the minimal promoter region of AFAP1-AS1. The ChIP assay results indicate that the AFAP1-AS1 promoter is responsive to the transcription factor c-Myc, which can promote high AFAP1-AS1 expression. This study is the first to clone and characterize the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region. Our findings will help to better understand the underlying mechanism of high AFAP1-AS1 expression in tumorigenesis and to develop new strategies for therapeutic high expression of AFAP1-AS1 in NPC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFAP1-AS1; c-Myc; lncRNA; promoter; transcription factor

Year:  2019        PMID: 30854123      PMCID: PMC6400686          DOI: 10.7150/jca.29049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck cancers arising from the nasopharynx epithelium 1-3. NPC has a distinctive ethnic and geographic distribution and represents a serious health problem in Southeast Asia and southern China, especially in Guangdong Province 4, 5. The etiology of NPC is multifactorial, including Epstein-Barr virus infection, heredity and environmental factors 6-9. NPC tumorigenesis often involves inactivation of several tumor suppressor genes and abnormal activation of several oncogenes 10-13, among which an increasing number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified in recent years 14-17. LncRNAs are more than 200 nucleotides in length and have no open reading frame. Dysregulation of lncRNAs has been shown to be involved in the development and progression of NPC 18-20. Among many cancer-related lncRNAs, the recently identified actin filament-associated protein 1-antisense RNA1 (AFAP1-AS1) has been the focus of great interest 21, 22. AFAP1-AS1 is derived from the antisense DNA strand of the AFAP1 coding gene locus, and dysregulated expression of AFAP1-AS1 has been found in many types of cancers, including NPC 23, 24. In our previous study, cDNA microarray analysis of lncRNA expression showed that AFAP1-AS1 is significantly upregulated in NPC. Consistent with this observation, AFAP1-AS1 expression is also upregulated in NPC tissues 25. In addition, AFAP1-AS1 knockdown significantly suppresses the metastasis and invasion of NPC 26. Moreover, high AFAP1-AS1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis of NPC patients 27. However, to our knowledge, a potential mechanism of high AFAP1-AS1 expression in NPC has not been reported. To understand the mechanism underlying AFAP1-AS1 regulation, we investigated whether AFAP1-AS1 expression was regulated at the level of transcription initiation. Through a comprehensive bioinformatics prediction, the potential promoter region of AFAP1-AS1 was identified and cloned. Furthermore, the transcription factor c-Myc was predicted to be associated with the AFAP1-AS1 promoter and to promote AFAP1-AS1 expression. In addition, deletion analysis identified a 332-bp fragment comprising the minimal promoter region of AFAP1-AS1. This study provides the basis for unraveling the potential mechanism of abnormal AFAP1-AS1 expression in NPC tumorigenesis.

Materials and methods

Cell lines, cell culture and transfection

The NPC cell line HNE2 was maintained in our laboratory and grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Life Technologies). Cells were incubated at 37ºC in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Cloning of the human AFAP1-AS1 promoter reporter constructs

The potential promoter region -1521/+220 of AFAP1-AS1 and a series of 5'- and 3'-deletion fragments (-1050/+220, -1050/-28, -1050/-80, -1050/-359, -881/-28, -496/-28 and -359/-28) were amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Table 1. All of the primers included 15-bp sequences homologous to the pGL3-enhancer luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Construct naming is based on the positions of the promoter fragments. The promoter fragments were then inserted into the pGL3-enhancer vector between the NheI and HindIII sites with ClonExpress®II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The recombinants were then transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 and confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Table 1

Primer pairs used for generating AFAP1-AS1 promoter deletion constructs.

pGL3-1521/+2205'- CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCTGTTTCCCATCCCAATAC -3'
5'- CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGCTTTTACCAAGAATCAGC -3'
pGL3-1050/+2205'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCAAAGTCTTACGGGTGTCG -3'
5'- CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGCTTTTACCAAGAATCAGC -3'
pGL3-1050/-805'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCAAAGTCTTACGGGTGTCG -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTAATAACGGGGAAGACCAG -3'
pGL3-1050/-285'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCAAAGTCTTACGGGTGTCG -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGGAACCCTTGATAAACCCT -3'
pGL3-1050/-3595'- CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCAAAGTCTTACGGGTGTCG -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTTGCAGAAGAAGCAGACCT -3'
pGL3-881/-285'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCCCAACATGGAGAAACCTG -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGGAACCCTTGATAAACCCT -3'
pGL3-496/-285'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCCCCAAAGAGTTCCCAGTC -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGGAACCCTTGATAAACCCT -3'
pGL3-359/-285'-CGAGCTCTTACGCGTGCTAGCTGCAGAAGAAGCAGACCT -3'
5'-CAGTACCGGAATGCCAAGCTTGGAACCCTTGATAAACCCT -3'

Luciferase reporter assay

Promoter activities were detected using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, HNE2 cells were transfected with 0.1 μg of Renilla luciferase expression plasmid pRL-TK (internal control for normalizing transfection efficiency; Promega) and 0.4 μg of various AFAP1-AS1 promoter constructs, pGL3-control plasmid (positive control; Promega), or pGL3-enhancer plasmid (negative control). The firefly luciferase readings were normalized by the Renilla luciferase readings to calculate the relative fold-change. Every transfection was independently repeated three times, and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to express the relative fold-change.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNAs were extracted using the TRIzol Extraction Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was prepared from total RNA using 5X All-In-One RT Master Mix (Applied Biologic Materials (abm), Richmond, Canada), after which real-time qPCR reactions were performed using the Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with SYBR Green (abm). The expression of each target gene was quantified by the comparative CT method using GAPDH as an endogenous control. The following primers were synthesized by Life Technologies and used to amplify AFAP1-AS1, c-Myc and GAPDH: AFAP1-AS1 forward primer (5'-AAT GGT GGT AGG AGG GAG GA-3'), reverse primer (5'-CAC ACA GGG GAA TGA AGA GG-3'); c-Myc forward primer (5'-CCT ACC CTC TCA ACG ACA GC-3'), reverse primer (5'-TTC CTC CTC AGA GTC GCT GC-3'); and GAPDH forward primer (5'-CAA CGG ATT TGG TCG TAT TGG-3'), reverse primer (5'-TGA CGG TGC CAT GGA ATT T-3'). All reactions were run in triplicate and repeated in three independent experiments.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assays were performed in HNE2 cells using a kit from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) according to manufacturer's protocol. Cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature to crosslink proteins to DNA, after which fixed cells were washed, lysed in cell lysis buffer supplemented with a protease-inhibitor cocktail, and sonicated to shear crosslinked DNA. Then, ~10% of sonicate was saved as an input sample. The crosslinked protein/DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated using the c-Myc antibody, the immunocomplexes were eluted, and the protein/DNA crosslinking was then reversed to release the DNA. The enrichment of purified DNA fragments was determined by real-time PCR using the following two primer sets for AFAP1-AS1: forward primer set 1, TGC ATG ATG ACA CAG AGG GT (start: -1305), reverse primer set 1, GAG GAT ATA GAG GAC TTG GGC T (start: -1166); forward primer set 2, CTC CCG CCA TGA TTC TGA G (start site: +30), and reverse primer set 2, CTT GGC CCA ATT CCT CCT G (start site: +145). Nonspecific antibody (IgG) served as a negative control.

Bioinformatics analysis

The gene sequence of human AFAP1-AS1 was obtained from NCBI. The potential promoter region of the AFAP1-AS1 was predicted using the online promoter prediction software BDGP (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html), Neural Network Promoter Prediction (http://promotor.biosino.org/), and Promoter 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/Promoter/). Additionally, CpG Island Searcher (http://www.hugedomains.com/domain_profile.cfm?d=cpgislands&e=com), CpG islands (http://www.ualberta.ca/~stothard/javascript/cpg_islands.html), and CpGProD (http://doua.prabi.fr/software/cpgprod_query) were utilized to find the CpG islands. The potential binding sites of transcription factors in the AFAP1-AS1 gene were identified with the UCSC database.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Student's t-test was used to evaluate significant differences between two groups of data. All data are represented as the means ± standard deviation. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Bioinformatics analysis of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region

To better understand the mechanism involved in the high AFAP1-AS1 expression in NPC, we used various bioinformatics tools to analyze the potential promoter region of AFAP1-AS1. The AFAP1-AS1 sequence was obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The 2000-bp region between positions -1600 bp and +400 bp (the transcription start site was designated as +1) was identified and analyzed. The promoter sequence was analyzed by BDGP, promoter 2.0, and Neural Network Promoter Prediction. A CpG island between positions -1145 and -477 was detected using CpG Islands, CpGProD, and CpG Island Searcher programs. Based on this comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, we chose the region between positions -1521 and +220 for further study (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Bioinformatics analysis of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region. Schematic representation of the potential AFAP1-AS1 promoter region and CpG islands. The putative promoter region and CpG islands are shown as rectangular boxes. The transcription start site was designated as +1, the regions before and after the transcription start site are numbered as - or + relative to it. BDGP: Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project; NNPP: Neural Network Promoter Prediction.

Construction of the reporter vector for the AFAP1-AS1 promoter

To analyze the transcriptional regulation of AFAP1-AS1, we used human peripheral blood-originated genomic DNA as the template to isolate the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region. A band with an expected size of approximately 1741 bp was successfully amplified and verified by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel (Figure 2A). The fragment was then cloned into the pGL3-enhancer vector and sequenced (Figure 2B). HNE2 cells were transiently transfected with the AFAP1-AS1 promoter construct (pGL3-1521/+220), and the luciferase activity was then measured. As shown in Figure 2C, the pGL3-1521/+220 construct had a higher luciferase activity than the negative control (relative luciferase activity: candidate promoter, 84.490 ± 8.232 vs. negative control, 1.608 ± 0.175, P<0.001), indicating that the -1521/+220 region of AFAP1-AS1 contains the potential promoter.
Figure 2

Construction of the reporter vector for the -1521/+220 region of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter. A, Gel analysis of the amplification of the -1521/+220 region, lane 1: DL2000 DNA marker, lane 2: the amplification of the -1521/+220 region detected by 1% agarose gel. B, Sequencing results of the pGL3-1521/+220 reporter construct. C, The pGL3-1521/+220 reporter plasmid and pRL-TK were transiently co-transfected into HNE2 cells. Luciferase activities were measured 48 h after transfection. The results are presented as the relative luciferase activity. Positive control: pGL3-control vector, negative control: pGL3-enhancer vector. The deletion samples were compared to the negative control. Data are shown as the means ± SD of at least three independent experiments, ***P< 0.001.

Identification of potential transcription factor binding sites in the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region in NPC cells

We used the UCSC website to predict potential transcription factor binding sites in the region between positions -1521 and +220 of AFAP1-AS1. Several putative binding sites for transcription factors were identified in this region, including c-Myc, ZBTB33, and CHD2. Considering that c-Myc is a very common transcriptional regulator 28, 29, we selected this transcription factor for subsequent validation (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

Identification of the potential transcription factor binding sites in the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region. A, Schematic representation of the predicted transcription factor binding in the -1521/+220 region using the UCSC website. B, Expression of c-Myc was measured in HNE2 cells transfected with the c-Myc overexpression vector by qPCR. C, c-Myc upregulates AFAP1-AS1 expression in HNE2 cells transfected with the c-Myc overexpression vector, compared with the control group (NC). D, ChIP assay in HNE2 cells using a c-Myc antibody, followed by quantitative real-time PCR with two sets of primers designed for two c-Myc binding sites of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region. All ChIP data are shown relative to 10% input (defined as 1). Nonspecific antibody (IgG) served as a negative control. *P< 0.05, ** P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001.

To verify whether c-Myc has a regulatory function in AFAP1-AS1 expression, a c-Myc overexpression vector was transiently transfected to express c-Myc in HNE2 cells (Figure 3B). As shown in Figure 3C, c-Myc overexpression can increase AFAP1-AS1 expression (P=0.027). To determine whether c-Myc binds specifically to the AFAP1-AS1 promoter, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in HNE2 cells. Two sets of primers for the AFAP1-AS1 promoter in close proximity to two predicted binding sites in the -1521/+220 region were used for real-time PCR. ChIP with an antibody against c-Myc resulted in a significant enrichment of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter region using both primer sets, compared to the control IgG (P=0.010 and 0.009, Figure 3D). Thus, these data indicate that c-Myc is the main transcription factor that promotes high AFAP1-AS1 expression in NPC cells.

Deletion analysis of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter in NPC cells

To identify the core promoter region of AFAP1-AS1, a series of progressive deletion fragments were generated and subcloned into the pGL3-enhancer vector. These constructs (plasmids pGL3-1521/+220, pGL3-1050/+220, pGL3-1050/-28, pGL3-1050/-80, pGL3-1050/-359, pGL3 -881/-28, pGL3-496/-28 and pGL3-359/-28, depicted in Figure 4A) were transiently transfected into HNE2 cells, and the luciferase activities driven by the AFAP1-AS1 promoter constructs were measured.
Figure 4

Luciferase reporter assay for the AFAP1-AS1 promoter. A, Schematic illustration of the 5'-deletion and 3'-deletion constructs of the AFAP1-AS1 promoter. B, The pGL3-enhancer and the deletion constructs were transiently transfected into HNE2 cells with pRL-TK. Luciferase activities were measured 48 h after transfection. The results are presented as the relative luciferase activity. Positive control: pGL3-control vector, negative control: pGL3-enhancer vector. The deletion samples were compared to the negative control. Data are shown as the means ± SD of at least three independent experiments. ***P< 0.001, ns: no significance.

As shown in Figure 4B, we standardized the negative control (pGL3-enhancer) to 1, and the luciferase activity from constructs pGL3-1050/-28 (60.560 ± 3.898), pGL3-881/-28 (63.520 ± 2.889) and pGL3-496/-28 (64.220 ± 1.774) exhibited similar levels in HNE2 cells. These levels were higher than those from constructs pGL3-1521/+220 (54.410 ± 4.313) and pGL3-1050/+220 (51.670 ± 3.945). The reporters driven by the shorter 332-bp fragment (PGL3-359/-28) showed the highest luciferase activity (65.740 ± 4.514, P<0.001, in comparison with a negative control). However, when the region between -80 and -28 was deleted, there was a remarkable reduction in luciferase activity (26.190 ± 1.936). Moreover, the pGL3-1050/-359 construct showed nearly no luciferase expression (0.741 ± 0.074, P=0.683, in comparison with a negative control), and it displayed a significantly lower luciferase activity compared to that of pGL3-1050/-28. In conclusion, the above data show that the region between positions -359 and -28 contains the core promoter that activates AFAP1-AS1 transcription and is necessary and required for basal transcriptional activity of AFAP1-AS1.

Discussion

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are often defined as transcribed non-coding RNAs that are longer than 200 nucleotides and have no significant protein-coding potential 30-32. In the past, lncRNAs were mistaken for transcriptional “noise”. However, with the advancement of high-throughput technologies, an increasing number of studies have focused on important roles of lncRNAs in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes, especially in cancers 33-35. LncRNAs may act as tumor suppressors or oncogenes by regulating target gene expression at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and epigenetic levels. LncRNAs can affect the initiation, progression, and prognosis of various cancers, including NPC 36-39. A growing number of lncRNAs have been reported to be closely associated with proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and radiation response of NPC cells, including MALAT-1 40, LINC01420 41, LOC553103 42, LOC401317 43, and AFAP1-AS1 27. Long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 is located in the 4p16.1 region of human chromosome 4, derives from the antisense DNA strand of the AFAP1 gene, and can regulate the expression of AFAP1 27. AFAP1-AS1 was initially discovered in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in 2013 44. Our in-depth study of AFAP1-AS1 functions in NPC and lung cancer progression showed that high AFAP1-AS1 expression might promote cell metastasis and invasion via regulation of the small GTPase Rho/Rac signaling pathway and actin filament integrity 23, 27. In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated that high AFAP1-AS1 levels are found in a variety of cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 45, non-small cell lung cancer 46, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 47, hepatocellular carcinoma 48, colorectal 49, cholangiocarcinoma 50, gastric 51, and gallbladder cancer 52. In addition, the dysregulated expression of AFAP1-AS1 is often associated with cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, radioresistance and poor prognosis of cancers 53, 54. The mechanisms behind the abnormal AFAP1-AS1 expression in cancers are not well-understood. A single study on AFAP1-AS1 showed that it was hypomethylated and overexpressed in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma 44. Considering that transcriptional regulation is one of the most important components of gene expression regulation 55, we investigated the mechanisms regulating AFAP1-AS1 expression at the level of transcription. Our comprehensive analysis of the CpG island and promoter prediction showed that the -1521/+220 region of AFAP1-AS1 contains the potential promoter, and a luciferase reporter driven by the promoter of AFAP1-AS1 showed high expression in HNE2 cells. Analysis of the -1521/+220 promoter region of AFAP1-AS1 by bioinformatics methods showed putative binding sites for transcription factors, such as c-Myc, ZBTB33, and CDH2. It is noteworthy that c-Myc has two binding sites in this region of AFAP1-AS1. The c-Myc proto-oncogene is a vital member of the Myc/Mad/Max transcription factor network, which regulates nearly 15% of genes in the human genome 56-58, and thereby participates in the regulation of various pathological processes in cancers 59, 60. Thus, c-Myc was selected as a possible candidate transcription factor for regulation of AFAP1-AS1 expression. Our research demonstrated that the AFAP1-AS1 promoter is responsive to c-Myc and that c-Myc overexpression can increase the expression of AFAP1-AS1, indicating that c-Myc may be the main transcription factor that promotes high AFAP1-AS1 expression in NPC. To identify the necessary and required region for the basal transcriptional activity of AFAP1-AS1, a series of deletion constructs based on pGL3-1521/+220 were generated and transfected in HNE2 cells. We found that the reporters driven by the shorter 332-bp fragment (PGL3-359/-28) showed the highest luciferase activity, and the deletion between positions -80 and -28 caused a significant decrease in promoter activity. Moreover, the luciferase expression was almost undetectable with the pGL3-1050/-359 construct. Thus, a region from -359 to -28 was identified as the minimal sequence that contains the core promoter and controls promoter activity. In addition to c-Myc, we also predicted several other putative transcription factor binding sites in the promoter region of AFAP1-AS1. Among these transcription factors, CDH2 61, ZBTB33 62, POLR2A 63, KDM5B 64, MAX 28, and ETS1 65 have been proven to be upregulated in different types of cancers and are closely related to tumorigenesis and tumor progression 66-69. Remarkably, the ETS1 and Myc promoter signals are well-correlated and share many properties; for example, Myc and ETS1 can collaborate to increase expression of some oncogenic genes 65. In addition, Myc and KDM5B can form a nuclear complex that promotes expression of several genes associated with tumorigenesis 70. Furthermore, the Myc/MAX network comprises a group of transcription factors whose distinct interactions result in gene-specific transcriptional activation 71. Therefore, Myc and other predicted transcription factors may exert a synergistic effect on the regulation of high AFAP1-AS1 expression. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this study is the first to clone and characterize the promoter region of AFAP1-AS1. We found that the transcriptional factor c-Myc plays an important role in enhancing AFAP1-AS1 expression. Our findings provide new insights into unraveling the underlying mechanism of high AFAP1-AS1 expression in tumorigenesis.
  71 in total

Review 1.  The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior.

Authors:  C Grandori; S M Cowley; L P James; R N Eisenman
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.827

2.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: advances in genomics and molecular genetics.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Zeng; Hongbin Huang; Wenling Zhang; Bo Xiang; Ming Zhou; Yanhong Zhou; Jian Ma; Mei Yi; Xiayu Li; Xiaoling Li; Wei Xiong; Guiyuan Li
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 3.  Regulation by c-Myc of ncRNA expression.

Authors:  Niall S Kenneth; Robert J White
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  Histone demethylase KDM5B collaborates with TFAP2C and Myc to repress the cell cycle inhibitor p21(cip) (CDKN1A).

Authors:  Ping-Pui Wong; Fabrizio Miranda; KaYi V Chan; Chiara Berlato; Helen C Hurst; Angelo G Scibetta
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  MYC on the path to cancer.

Authors:  Chi V Dang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  The c-Myc target gene network.

Authors:  Chi V Dang; Kathryn A O'Donnell; Karen I Zeller; Tam Nguyen; Rebecca C Osthus; Feng Li
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 7.  c-Myc and eIF4F constitute a feedforward loop that regulates cell growth: implications for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Chen-Ju Lin; Abba Malina; Jerry Pelletier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Hypomethylation of noncoding DNA regions and overexpression of the long noncoding RNA, AFAP1-AS1, in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Tushar D Bhagat; Xue Yang; Jee Hoon Song; Yulan Cheng; Rachana Agarwal; John M Abraham; Sariat Ibrahim; Matthias Bartenstein; Zulfiqar Hussain; Masako Suzuki; Yiting Yu; Wei Chen; Charis Eng; John Greally; Amit Verma; Stephen J Meltzer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  c-MYC: more than just a matter of life and death.

Authors:  Stella Pelengaris; Mike Khan; Gerard Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  LPLUNC1 inhibits nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell growth via down-regulation of the MAP kinase and cyclin D1/E2F pathways.

Authors:  Yixin Yang; Qianjin Liao; Fang Wei; Xiaoling Li; Wenling Zhang; Songqing Fan; Lei Shi; Xiayu Li; Zhaojian Gong; Jian Ma; Ming Zhou; Juanjuan Xiang; Shuping Peng; Bo Xiang; Hao Deng; Yunbo Yang; Yong Li; Wei Xiong; Zhaoyang Zeng; Guiyuan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  AFAP1-AS1: a rising star among oncogenic long non-coding RNAs.

Authors:  Fang Xiong; Kunjie Zhu; Su Deng; Hongbin Huang; Liting Yang; Zhaojian Gong; Lei Shi; Yi He; Yanyan Tang; Qianjin Liao; Jianjun Yu; Xiaoling Li; Yong Li; Guiyuan Li; Zhaoyang Zeng; Wei Xiong; Shanshan Zhang; Can Guo
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.038

2.  circSETD3 regulates MAPRE1 through miR-615-5p and miR-1538 sponges to promote migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Le Tang; Wei Xiong; Lishen Zhang; Dan Wang; Yian Wang; Yingfen Wu; Fang Wei; Yongzhen Mo; Xiangchan Hou; Lei Shi; Fang Xiong; Shanshan Zhang; Zhaojian Gong; Qianjin Liao; Bo Xiang; Wenling Zhang; Ming Zhou; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Can Guo; Zhaoyang Zeng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  LncRNA AATBC regulates Pinin to promote metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ting Tang; Liting Yang; Yujian Cao; Maonan Wang; Shanshan Zhang; Zhaojian Gong; Fang Xiong; Yi He; Yujuan Zhou; Qianjin Liao; Bo Xiang; Ming Zhou; Can Guo; Xiaoling Li; Yong Li; Wei Xiong; Guiyuan Li; Zhaoyang Zeng
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  GPC6 Promotes Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunmei Fan; Chaofeng Tu; Peng Qi; Can Guo; Bo Xiang; Ming Zhou; Xiayu Li; Xu Wu; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Wei Xiong; Zhaoyang Zeng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  circMAN1A2 could serve as a novel serum biomarker for malignant tumors.

Authors:  Chun-Mei Fan; Jin-Peng Wang; Yan-Yan Tang; Jin Zhao; Shu-Yi He; Fang Xiong; Can Guo; Bo Xiang; Ming Zhou; Xiao-Ling Li; Yong Li; Gui-Yuan Li; Wei Xiong; Zhao-Yang Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 6.  Long non-coding RNA PVT1 interacts with MYC and its downstream molecules to synergistically promote tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ke Jin; Shufei Wang; Yazhuo Zhang; Mengfang Xia; Yongzhen Mo; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Zhaoyang Zeng; Wei Xiong; Yi He
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Long Noncoding RNA AFAP1-AS1 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Metastasis via the miR-155-5p/FGF7 Axis and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Wu Ma; Da-Yong Xi; Jian-Zhong Ma; Min Guo; Li Ma; Dong-Hong Ma; Pei-Wu Li; Chang-An Guo
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Long Noncoding RNA AFAP1-AS1 Is a Critical Regulator of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Tumorigenicity.

Authors:  Min Fang; Minjun Zhang; Yiqing Wang; Fangqiang Wei; Jianhui Wu; Xiaozhou Mou; Yigan Zhang; Xiaodong Liang; Jianming Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 accelerates lung cancer cells migration and invasion by interacting with SNIP1 to upregulate c-Myc.

Authors:  Yu Zhong; Liting Yang; Fang Xiong; Yi He; Yanyan Tang; Lei Shi; Songqing Fan; Zheng Li; Shanshan Zhang; Zhaojian Gong; Can Guo; Qianjin Liao; Yujuan Zhou; Ming Zhou; Bo Xiang; Xiaoling Li; Yong Li; Zhaoyang Zeng; Guiyuan Li; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  The BRAF V600E mutation is a predictor of the effect of radioiodine therapy in papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Junshang Ge; Jie Wang; Hui Wang; Xianjie Jiang; Qianjin Liao; Qian Gong; Yongzhen Mo; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Wei Xiong; Jin Zhao; Zhaoyang Zeng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.