Lionel Rebibo1, Abdennaceur Dhahri1, Rachid Badaoui2, Vincent Hubert2, Emmanuel Lorne3, Jean-Marc Regimbeau4. 1. Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France; SSPC (Simplification des Soins des Patients Complexes) - Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex 01, France. 4. Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France; SSPC (Simplification des Soins des Patients Complexes) - Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex 01, France. Electronic address: regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few series have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as day-case surgery (DCS). OBJECTIVE: Compare the outcomes and healthcare costs of SG performed as DCS or as an inpatient procedure. SETTING: University Hospital, France, public practice. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study of 250 consecutive patients undergoing day-case SG from May 2011 to June 2017. Each patient in the DCS group (n = 250) was manually paired by sex, age, body mass index, preoperative co-morbidities, and year of surgery with 1 patient undergoing SG as an inpatient procedure (SG control group, n = 250). Patients in the SG control group were excluded from DCS on the basis of DCS criteria. The primary endpoint of this study was the clinical and economic impact of performing SG as DCS compared with inpatient management. The secondary endpoints were related to DCS, DCS satisfaction rate, comparison of outcomes and costs between DCS and inpatient procedures, and the changing modalities of SG as DCS in our institution (by comparing the first 100 patients to the last 150 patients). RESULTS: A total of 1573 patients underwent SG during the period, 250 patients underwent SG as DCS (15.9%) and 554 patients were excluded on the basis of DCS criteria. No postoperative deaths, 19 overnight admissions (7.6%), 16 unscheduled consultations (6.4%), and 12 unscheduled hospitalizations (4.8%) were observed in the DCS group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications. Readmission was higher in the DCS group (5.6% versus 4%; P < .001), while the length of rehospitalization was shorter in the DCS group (5.8 versus 10.8 d; P < .001). Overall cost and cost per patient were significantly lower in the DCS group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Day-case SG on selected patients was not associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates and was cost-effective due to the low cost of management of postoperative complications.
BACKGROUND: Few series have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as day-case surgery (DCS). OBJECTIVE: Compare the outcomes and healthcare costs of SG performed as DCS or as an inpatient procedure. SETTING: University Hospital, France, public practice. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study of 250 consecutive patients undergoing day-case SG from May 2011 to June 2017. Each patient in the DCS group (n = 250) was manually paired by sex, age, body mass index, preoperative co-morbidities, and year of surgery with 1 patient undergoing SG as an inpatient procedure (SG control group, n = 250). Patients in the SG control group were excluded from DCS on the basis of DCS criteria. The primary endpoint of this study was the clinical and economic impact of performing SG as DCS compared with inpatient management. The secondary endpoints were related to DCS, DCS satisfaction rate, comparison of outcomes and costs between DCS and inpatient procedures, and the changing modalities of SG as DCS in our institution (by comparing the first 100 patients to the last 150 patients). RESULTS: A total of 1573 patients underwent SG during the period, 250 patients underwent SG as DCS (15.9%) and 554 patients were excluded on the basis of DCS criteria. No postoperative deaths, 19 overnight admissions (7.6%), 16 unscheduled consultations (6.4%), and 12 unscheduled hospitalizations (4.8%) were observed in the DCS group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications. Readmission was higher in the DCS group (5.6% versus 4%; P < .001), while the length of rehospitalization was shorter in the DCS group (5.8 versus 10.8 d; P < .001). Overall cost and cost per patient were significantly lower in the DCS group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Day-case SG on selected patients was not associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates and was cost-effective due to the low cost of management of postoperative complications.
Authors: Nicolas H Dreifuss; Carolina Vanetta; Francisco Schlottmann; Antonio Cubisino; Alberto Mangano; Carolina Baz; Francesco M Bianco; Antonio Gangemi; Chandra Hassan; Mario A Masrur Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Nicolas H Dreifuss; Julia Xie; Francisco Schlottmann; Antonio Cubisino; Carolina Baz; Carolina Vanetta; Alberto Mangano; Francesco M Bianco; Antonio Gangemi; Mario A Masrur Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.479