Literature DB >> 30853091

Feasibility of using a fully immersive virtual reality system for kinematic data collection.

Kate A Spitzley1, Andrew R Karduna2.   

Abstract

Commercially-available Virtual Reality (VR) systems have the potential to be effective tools for simultaneous visual manipulation and kinematic data collection. Previously, these systems have been integrated with research-grade motion capture systems to provide both functionalities; however, they are yet to be used as stand-alone systems for kinematic data collection. The present study aimed to validate the HTC VIVE VR system for kinematic data collection by evaluating the accuracy of its position and orientation signals. The VIVE controller and tracker were each compared to a Polhemus Liberty magnetic tracking system sensor for angular and translational measurement error and signal drift. A sensor from each system was mounted to opposite ends of a rigid segment which was driven through fifty rotations and fifty translations. Mean angular errors for both the VIVE tracker and controller were below 0.4°. Mean translational error for both sensors was below 3 mm. Drift in the Liberty signal components was consistently lower than drift in VIVE components. However, all mean rotational drift measures were below 0.1° and all mean translational measures were below 0.35 mm. These data indicate that the HTC VIVE system has the potential to be a valid and reliable means of kinematic data collection. However, further investigation is necessary to determine the VIVE's suitability for capturing extremely minute or high-volume movements.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  HTC VIVE; Kinematics; Sensors; VR; Validation; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30853091     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  A New Sensitive Test Using Virtual Reality and Foam to Probe Postural Control in Vestibular Patients: The Unilateral Schwannoma Model.

Authors:  Grâce Oussou; Christophe Magnani; Ioannis Bargiotas; Georges Lamas; Frederic Tankere; Catherine Vidal
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Application of a virtual reality tracker-based system to measure seated postural stability in stroke patients.

Authors:  Huey-Wen Liang; Tzu-Ling Tai; Yue-Hua Li; Ying-Chun Chen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Mobilization and calibration of the HTC VIVE for virtual reality physical therapy.

Authors:  Sydney Hemphill; Alan Nguyen; Samuel T Rodriguez; Maria Menendez; Ellen Wang; Kiley Lawrence; Thomas J Caruso
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-11

4.  Commercial head-mounted display virtual reality for upper extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke: a single-case design study.

Authors:  Mattias Erhardsson; Margit Alt Murphy; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Is a Depth Camera in Agreement with an Electromagnetic Tracking Device when Measuring Head Position?

Authors:  Vienna-Jaye Burchell; Gemma Arblaster; David Buckley; Jonathan Wheat
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  Virtual Reality for Shoulder Rehabilitation: Accuracy Evaluation of Oculus Quest 2.

Authors:  Arianna Carnevale; Ilaria Mannocchi; Mohamed Saifeddine Hadj Sassi; Marco Carli; Giovanna De Luca; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Denaro; Emiliano Schena
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  An Evaluation of Motion Trackers with Virtual Reality Sensor Technology in Comparison to a Marker-Based Motion Capture System Based on Joint Angles for Ergonomic Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jan P Vox; Anika Weber; Karen Insa Wolf; Krzysztof Izdebski; Thomas Schüler; Peter König; Frank Wallhoff; Daniel Friemert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.