Literature DB >> 30852679

Effects of denosumab on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in kidney transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Charat Thongprayoon1, Prakrati Acharya2, Narothama Reddy Aeddula3, Aldo Torres-Ortiz2, Tarun Bathini4, Konika Sharma5, Patompong Ungprasert6, Kanramon Watthanasuntorn5, Maria Lourdes Gonzalez Suarez2, Sohail Abdul Salim2, Wisit Kaewput7, Jirat Chenbhanich8, Michael A Mao1, Wisit Cheungpasitporn9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of immunosuppressive agents, especially glucocorticoids, are associated with increased risks of bone loss in kidney transplant patients. Denosumab, a potent antiresorptive agent, has been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD. However, its effects on bone metabolism and BMD in kidney transplant patients remain unclear.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database from inception through April 2018 to identify studies evaluating denosumab's effect on changes in bone metabolism and BMD from baseline to post-treatment course in kidney transplant patients. Study results were pooled and analyzed utilizing random-effects model. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018095055).
RESULTS: Five studies (a clinical trial and four cohort studies) with a total of 162 kidney transplant patients were identified. The majority of patients had a baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. After treatment (≥ 6 to 12 months), there were significant increases in BMD with standardized mean differences (SMDs) of 3.26 (95% CI 0.88-5.64) and 1.83 (95% CI 0.43 to 3.22) for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. There were also significant increases in T scores with SMDs of 0.92 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.25) and 1.14 (95% CI 0.17 to 2.10) for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. After treatment, there were no significant changes in serum calcium (Ca) or parathyroid hormone (PTH) from baseline to post-treatment course (≥ 6 months) with mean differences (MDs) of 0.52 (95% CI, - 0.13 to 1.16) mmol/L and - 13.24 (95% CI, - 43.85 to 17.37) ng/L, respectively. The clinical trial data demonstrated more asymptomatic hypocalcemia in the denosumab (12 episodes in 39 patients) than in the control (1 episode in 42 patients) group. From the cohort studies, the pooled incidence of hypocalcemia following denosumab treatment was 1.7% (95% CI 0.4 to 6.6%). All reported hypocalcemic episodes were mild and asymptomatic, but the majority of patients required Ca and vitamin D supplements.
CONCLUSION: Among kidney transplant patients with good allograft function, denosumab effectively increases BMD and T scores in the lumbar spine and femur neck. From baseline to post-treatment, there are no differences in serum Ca and PTH. However, mild hypocalcemia can occur following denosumab treatment, requiring monitoring and titration of Ca and vitamin D supplements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metabolism; Bone mineral density; Calcium; Denosumab; Hypocalcemia; Kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852679     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0587-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of hypocalcemia.

Authors:  Jessica Pepe; Luciano Colangelo; Federica Biamonte; Chiara Sonato; Vittoria Carmela Danese; Veronica Cecchetti; Marco Occhiuto; Valentina Piazzolla; Viviana De Martino; Federica Ferrone; Salvatore Minisola; Cristiana Cipriani
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  M Abdalbary; M Sobh; S Elnagar; M A Elhadedy; N Elshabrawy; M Abdelsalam; K Asadipooya; A Sabry; A Halawa; A El-Husseini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Effect of denosumab treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in osteoporotic patients: real-life experience 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ceyda Dincer Yazan; Onur Bugdayci; Can Ilgin; Dilek Gogas Yavuz
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.879

4.  Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppression and the Risk of Fracture: Clinical and Economic Implications.

Authors:  Sarat Kuppachi; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Ruixin Li; Yasar Caliskan; Mark A Schnitzler; Mara McAdams-DeMarco; JiYoon B Ahn; Sunjae Bae; Gregory P Hess; Dorry L Segev; Krista L Lentine; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 5.  Bone and Mineral Disorder in Renal Transplant Patients: Overview of Pathology, Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects.

Authors:  Paolo Molinari; Carlo Maria Alfieri; Deborah Mattinzoli; Mariarosaria Campise; Angela Cervesato; Silvia Malvica; Evaldo Favi; Piergiorgio Messa; Giuseppe Castellano
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-10

6.  Osteoporosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Chia-Yu Hsu; Li-Ru Chen; Kuo-Hu Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Bone Quality in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions - Part II.

Authors:  Kamyar Asadipooya; Mohamed Abdalbary; Yahya Ahmad; Elijah Kakani; Marie-Claude Monier-Faugere; Amr El-Husseini
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

8.  Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Charat Thongprayoon; Panupong Hansrivijit; Napat Leeaphorn; Prakrati Acharya; Aldo Torres-Ortiz; Wisit Kaewput; Karthik Kovvuru; Swetha R Kanduri; Tarun Bathini; Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.