| Literature DB >> 30852582 |
Guohui Xing1, Lili Wang2, Wei Li3, Yanling Xu1, Xia Shi1, Guixing Xu3, Jiajun Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and its correlation with the blood lipid level in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 118 patients with UGIB were enrolled in this study. The relevant indicators for blood lipid levels were detected using a biochemical analyzer. MCP-1 levels in the serum of patients was determined through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 17.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. Two-sample t-test was used for the intergroup comparison. The significant indicators were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to analyze the prognostic factors of UGIB. Pearson analysis was applied to the correlation analysis. P<0.05 suggested that the difference was statistically significant. RESULTS MCP-1 expression levels in patients with UGIB were significantly lower than that in the control group and were even further reduced in patients with massive hemorrhage. The levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the serum of patients with UGIB were decreased compared with those in the control group and these indicators of the blood lipid level were decreased much more in patients with massive hemorrhage. The MCP-1 expression was positively correlated with the levels of TC, TG, and LDL in serum. MCP-1 and TC were the prognostic influencing factors of UGIB. CONCLUSIONS Serum MCP-1 expression was significantly decreased in patients with UGIB and correlated with blood lipid level, suggesting it might be a prognostic factor for UGB.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30852582 PMCID: PMC6422425 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.911897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Basic data of experimental group and control group.
| Gender | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n) | Female (n) | ||
| UGIB group | Peptic ulcer | 33 | 30 |
| Acute gastric mucosal lesion | 7 | 8 | |
| Liver cirrhosis variceal hemorrhage | 8 | 10 | |
| Gastrointestinal tumor hemorrhage | 11 | 9 | |
| Vascular malformation | 2 | 0 | |
| Control group | 22 | 23 | |
Figure 1MCP-1 expression levels in the normal group and the upper gastrointestinal bleeding group.
The levels of detection indicators in the UGIB group and control group.
| Detection indicators | Experimental group (n=118) | Control group (n=45) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmoL/L) | 1.07±1.19 | 1.63±1.01 | 0.031 |
| TG (mmoL/L) | 3.21±1.02 | 4.93±1.08 | 0.002 |
| HDL (mmoL/L) | 1.16±0.17 | 1.21±0.22 | 0.076 |
| LDL (mmoL/L) | 1.89±0.72 | 2.81±0.79 | 0.011 |
| ApoA (mmoL/L) | 1.34±0.21 | 1.73±0.31 | 0.061 |
| ApoB (mmoL/L) | 0.82±0.26 | 1.24±0.39 | 0.054 |
Figure 2Correlations of MCP-1 level with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding amount.
Blood lipid indicators in the massive hemorrhage group and the moderate hemorrhage group.
| Detection indicators | Massive hemorrhage group (n=42) | Moderate hemorrhage group (n=76) | Control group (n=45) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmoL/L) | 1.01±0.89 | 1.47±0.19 | 1.63±1.01 | 0.042 |
| TG (mmoL/L) | 2.21±1.12 | 3.51±1.06 | 4.93±1.08 | 0.012 |
| HDL (mmoL/L) | 1.26±0.17 | 1.16±0.17 | 1.21±0.22 | 0.079 |
| LDL (mmoL/L) | 1.59±0.74 | 1.99±0.62 | 2.81±0.79 | 0.031 |
| ApoA (mmoL/L) | 1.31±0.23 | 1.24±0.21 | 1.73±0.31 | 0.071 |
| ApoB (mmoL/L) | 0.89±0.28 | 0.92±0.26 | 1.24±0.39 | 0.064 |
Results of univariate correlation analysis of MCP-1 in patients with UGIB.
| Clinical indicators | Correlation analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| r | p | |
| TC (mmoL/L) | 0.113 | 0.318 |
| TG (mmoL/L) | 0.581 | 0.002 |
| HDL (mmoL/L) | −0.241 | 0.212 |
| LDL (mmoL/L) | 0.667 | 0.023 |
| ApoA (mmoL/L) | 0.583 | 0.656 |
| ApoB (mmoL/L) | 0.665 | 0.432 |
Results of univariate logistic regression analysis of UGIB.
| Factor | Regression coefficient | Standard error | Wald | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.59 | 0.196 | 0.063 | 0.092 | 0.962 (0.639–1.397) |
| Age | 0.115 | 0.026 | 0.537 | 0.879 | 0.852 (0.639–1.798) |
| TG | −2.131 | 0.088 | 61.340 | 0.042 | 1.298 (0.784–1.361) |
| TC | −1.131 | 0.125 | 79.780 | 0.032 | 0.997 (0.675–1.131) |
| HDL | −3.677 | 0.412 | 80.035 | 0.721 | 0.587 (0.443–1.112) |
| LDL | −1.223 | 0.147 | 71.319 | 0.003 | 0.978 (0.678–1.231) |
| ApoA | −2.983 | 0.366 | 66.272 | 0.234 | 0.667 (0.329–0.975) |
| ApoB | −2.866 | 0.418 | 47.705 | 0.452 | 0.742 (0.563–0.876) |
| MCP-1 | −2.022 | 0.008 | 47.370 | 0.001 | 1.311 (0.873–1.219) |
Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis of UGIB.
| Factor | Regression coefficient | Standard error | Wald | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | −0.631 | 0.088 | 61.340 | 0.072 | 1.098 (0.741–1.261) |
| TC | −1.331 | 0.135 | 79.780 | 0.022 | 0.947 (0.625–1.141) |
| LDL | −0.923 | 0.157 | 71.319 | 0.083 | 0.778 (0.679–1.131) |
| MCP-1 | −2.322 | 0.018 | 435.370 | 0.011 | 1.411 (0.973–1.519) |