Literature DB >> 30852389

Role of nitric oxide in pancreatic cancer cells exhibiting the invasive phenotype.

Mayumi Fujita1, Veena Somasundaram2, Debashree Basudhar2, Robert Y S Cheng2, Lisa A Ridnour2, Harumi Higuchi3, Kaori Imadome3, Jae Hong No4, Gaurav Bharadwaj2, David A Wink5.   

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly metastatic pan class="Disease">tumor with an extremely low 5-year survival rate. Lack of efficient diagnostics and dearth of effective therapeutics that can target the cancer as well as the microenvironment niche are the reasons for limited success in treatment and management of this disease. Cell invasion through extracellular matrix (ECM) involves the complex regulation of adhesion to and detachment from ECM and its understanding is critical to metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer. To understand the characteristics of these cancer cells and their ability to metastasize, we compared human pancreatic cancer cell line, PANC-1 and its invading phenotype (INV) collected from transwell inserts. The invasive cell type, INV, exhibited higher resistance to Carbon-ion radiation compared to whole cultured (normally dish-cultured) PANC-1 (WCC), and had more efficient in vitro spheroid formation capability. Invasiveness of INV was hampered by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors, suggesting that nitric oxide (NO) plays a cardinal role in PANC-1 invasion. In addition, in vitro studies indicated that a MEK-ERK-dependent, JAK independent mechanism through which NOS/NO modulate PANC-1 invasiveness. Suspended INV showed enhanced NO production as well as induction of several pro-metastatic, and stemness-related genes. NOS inhibitor, l-NAME, reduced the expression of these pro-metastatic or stemness-related genes, and dampened spheroid formation ability, suggesting that NO can potentially influence pancreatic cancer aggressiveness. Furthermore, xenograft studies with INV and WCC in NSG mouse model revealed a greater ability of INV compared to WCC, to metastasize to the liver and l-NAME diminished the metastatic lesions in mice injected with INV. Overall, data suggest that NO is a key player associated with resistance to radiation and metastasis of pancreatic cancer; and inhibition of NOS demonstrates therapeutic potential as observed in the animal model by specifically targeting the metastatic cells that harbor stem-like features and are potentially responsible for relapse.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer stem cell; Invasion; Metastasis; Nitric oxide; Nitric oxide synthase; Pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852389      PMCID: PMC6409427          DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Redox Biol        ISSN: 2213-2317            Impact factor:   11.799


carbon ion radiation therapy cancer stem-like cells 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate extracellular membrane epithelial-mesenchymal transition extracellular signal-regulated kinase invaded pan class="Gene">PANC-1 cells INV suspended in serum free media for 4 h janus kinase N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine, pan class="Chemical">monoacetate salt matrix metallopeptidase 9 nitric oxide nitrite soluble guanylyl cyclase pathway nitric oxide synthase NOD scid gamma mice 1H-[1,2, 4]oxadiazolo[4,3,-a]quinoxalin-1-one phosphorylated-ERK phosphorylated-MAPK/ERK kinase signal transducers and activators of transcription whole cultured PANC-1 cells WCC suspended in serum free media for 4 h

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is a highly metastatic pan class="Disease">tumor with an extremely low 5-year survival rate [[1], [2], [3]]. During metastasis, cancer cells undergo a multi-step process where they invade through the tumor tissue and the basal membrane into a blood or lymphatic vessel [4]. Once tumor cells are in the circulatory system, they can reach and reattach to favorable niches in different organs followed by colonization. Metastasis is the main cause of patient mortality as it is extremely difficult to treat. Understanding the characteristics of the cancer cell population that exhibits the invasive phenotype compared to the non-invasive phenotype is fundamental for developing novel strategies to counter metastasis. Carbon ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) has emerged as an important therapeutic option specially for advanced, inoperable pan class="Disease">pancreatic cancers. It can provide a highly conformal dose distribution so that a high dose can be delivered to tumors with minimum damage to the surrounding healthy tissue [5]. Recent studies showed that C-ion RT led to favorable outcomes both as a stand-alone therapy as well as in combination with gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic used for pancreatic cancer. Moreover, the therapy was well-tolerated with limited toxicities [6,7]. The merit of C-ion RT is further substantiated by a clinical trial that was initiated last year [8]. However, it is also known that some malignant tumors exhibit resistance to radiotherapy [9]. Our previous study indicated that invasive cells may exhibit a stable and distinguishable phenotype that may impart special, therapy resistant characteristics to these cells [10,11]. Therefore, it is crucial to establish whether pancreatic cancer shows phenotype dependent resistance to C-ion RT and examine their mechanism of resistance. Development of relevant in vitro and in vivo models is a key step in understanding phenotypic differences in the response to C-ion RT. The Boyden chamber transwell assay is a widely used experimental method for studying tumor cell invasiveness in vitro [12]. Several studies on pancreatic cancer cells have shown that only a very small percentage of the cells could invade through the transwell in pancreatic cancer cell lines studied [10,[13], [14], [15]]. In the case of PANC-1 cells, we have previously found that only about one percent of seeded cells invaded through the transwell [15]. This was further investigated using a 3D spheroid model of PANC-1, embedded in Matrigel, coupled with live cell imaging analysis to capture the movement of the distinct invading population [11]. These invaded PANC-1 cells (INV) exhibited increased nitric oxide (NO) production compared to whole cultured PANC-1 cells (WCC) and, the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-l-arginine, monoacetate salt (L-NMMA), was effective in reducing PANC-1 invasion [15]. INV and WCC cells that are both collected from PANC-1 parental cell line, are isogenic yet express distinctive phenotypes. Hence, in this study, we use the WCC as the control group for comparison with the INV cells that have invaded through the transwell chamber. Herein, we establish that invasive cell phenotype that leads to the metastatic spread of pan class="Disease">pancreatic cancer is a discernible and persistent phenotype that is resistant to C-ion radiation. This phenotype showed upregulation of NO production and was effectively targeted using a pan-NOS inhibitor for improved therapy response in NSG mouse model for pancreatic adenocarcinoma metastasis. In vitro studies point towards a MEK-ERK-dependent, JAK signaling independent mechanism through which NOS/NO modulate invasiveness in PANC-1. Our results convincingly establish that inhibition of NO production is a viable therapeutic option to improve efficacy of C-ion RT.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and reagents

The human pan class="Disease">pancreatic cancer cell line, PANC-1 was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biologicals, GA, USA), 2 mM l-glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells in logarithmic growth phase seeded at an appropriate density were used for all experiments. 1400W-HCl (Wako, Osaka, Japan), 1H-[1,2, 4]oxadiazolo[4,3,-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Burlington, MA, USA), N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), U0126 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), InSolution ERK inhibitor II (Millipore), JAK Inhibitor I (Millipore) were the inhibitors used.

INV preparation and re-invasion assay

To prepare the invaded cells, transwell invasion assays were performed as described previously [11]. Briefly, cells were trypsinized and viable cell numbers were counted with trypan blue and separated into two groups; one of them was for the whole cultured cells (WCC), the other set was for preparing the invaded cells (INV). For WCC, cells were suspended in DMEM with 10% FBS, and plated on the culture dish at the appropriate density. For preparation of INV, cells were suspended into serum-free DMEM, and 1 × 10ˆ6 cells were seeded into upper well of each transwell chambers (the 24 mm transwell insert diameter with a pore size of 8 μm, Corning) coated with 260 μL Matrigel (2.9 mg/mL concentration). DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the lower well as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, the non-invasive cells remaining on the Matrigel-coated side were wiped off with a cotton swab, and the cells that moved through to the undersurface of the transwell membrane were collected by incubating the cells with Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA) for 15 min at room temperature. INV collected from several transwells were pooled, suspended in DMEM with 10% FBS and plated on the culture dish at the appropriate density. For the re-invasion assay, WCC and INV were trypsinized on day 1, 4, 7, 11, or 18 after cultivation, and the transwell invasion assay was repeated with these cells (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Transwell invasion assay

The invasive potential of pan class="Gene">PANC-1 cells was examined as previously described [15]. Briefly, matrigel was added to culture insert of transwell chambers containing a 6.5-mm filter with a pore size of 8 μm (Corning, NY, USA), and 1.5 × 10ˆ5 cells suspended with serum-free DMEM were seeded onto it. DMEM with 10% FBS was added to the lower well, and the invasion assay was performed for 24 h. Invasive cells that reached the undersurface of the transwell membrane were fixed and stained with Diff Quick (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The transwell membrane were photographed and number of invaded cells in each field were counted with ImageJ software. Percentage of invaded cells was calculated by dividing the number of invaded cells with the number of seeded cells on the transwell membrane. For inhibitor studies, cells were pre-treated with 1400W, pan class="Chemical">ODQ, l-NAME, U0126, ERK inhibitor II or JAK inhibitor I, and incubated for 16 h. Cells were then trypsinized, suspended in serum-free DMEM with appropriate inhibitor, and used for the invasion assay.

Irradiation and colony formation assay

Cells were irradiated with either X-ray or Carbon ion (C-ion) radiation and the colony formation assay was performed as previously described [16,17]. Briefly, cells were irradiated with the C-ion radiation with initial energy of 290 MeV/u and the linear energy transfer value as 80 keV/μm corresponding to a mono-energetic beam with narrow Bragg Peak at a depth of 10 cm. X-ray irradiation was performed as described previously [17]. Cells were then trypsinized and plated in 60-mm diameter plastic dishes and cultured for 13 days. Colonies were then fixed and stained with 1% pan class="Chemical">methylene blue in 30% methanol, and those consisting of >50 cells were scored as a surviving colony.

NOS inhibitor treatment and suspension of cells

PANC-1 cells were plated in pan class="Chemical">DMEM with 10% FBS. After 24 h, culture medium was changed to serum-free DMEM with or without NOS inhibitors and cells were incubated for 16 h. For the suspended cell group, cells were then trypsinized and suspended for 4 h in serum-free DMEM with or without NOS inhibitors, and used for DAF-FM staining, and RNA or protein sampling. For the adherent cell group, cells were directly used for the experiments.

Detection of NO producing cells

DAF-FM (4-Amino-5-Methylamino-2′,7′-Difluorofluorescein Diacetate) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [18] was used for the detection of NO-producing cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, cells were washed twice with pan class="Chemical">PBS, followed by staining with DAF-FM in serum-free DMEM for 45min. Cells were then washed with PBS and three randomly selected fields were imaged with a fluorescence microscope. Percentage of NO-producing cells was calculated by dividing the number of DAF-FM-positive cells with the total number of cells visualized in bright field image. For the prolonged detection of DAF-FM signals, 1 × 10ˆ4 cells, which were suspended in serum free DMEM, were plated on black 96 well plate, and fluorescent signals were detected every 30 min for 17 h using the SpectraMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted with TRizol (pan class="Gene">Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA samples were reverse transcribed into cDNA using RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (TAKARA, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primer sequences used in this study are summarized in Table 1. RT-PCR reactions were designed to follow a universal real time PCR condition: 94 °C for 2 min, 45 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s each, and 60 °C for 30 s in the SensiFAST Syber Lo-ROX master mix (Bioline, London, UK). Relative expression of mRNA was calculated using the ddCt formula.
Table 1

Primer table.

Gene NameDirectionPrimer Sequence
NOS1FGGAATCCAGGTGGACAGAGA
RTTCCCCCATAGGTCATTGAA
NOS2FATGCTCAGCTCATCCGCTAT
RCGATGCACAGCTGAGTGAAT
NOS3FGATGCTCCCAACTTGACCAT
RTAGGTCTTGGGGTTGTCAGG
MMP9FCATCGTCATCCAGTTTGGTG
RAGGGACCACAACTCGTCATC
S100A8FTCAGGAAAAAGGGTGCAGAC
RACGCCCATCTTTATCACCAG
5-LOXFCAAAGCGATGGAGAACCTGT
RTTTCTCAAAGTCGGCGAAGT
CXCR4FCGTCTCAGTGCCCTTTTGTT
RCTCTCCTCCCCATCTTTTCC
CDH1FGGTTCAAGCTGCTGACCTTC
RTTGTACGTGGTGGGATTGAA
CD133FCCTCATGGTTGGAGTTGGAT
RTTCCACATTTGCACCAAAGA
ALDH1FCTCAAGGCCCTCAGATTGAC
RGTTTGGCCCCTTCTTTCTTC
NANOGFACAGGTGAAGACCTGGTTCC
RCTGGGGTAGGTAGGTGCTGA
SOX2FAACTCACCAGGATGCTCACA
RGCACTTCCTCCAGAGGTTTG
ACTBFGCAAGGCCGGCTTCGCGGGC
RTCACGCCCTGGTGCCTGGGGC
RPL18FGGATGATCCGGAAGATGAAG
RCCGCACATCATCAGTTATGG
Primer table.

Capillary western blot

Western blots were performed using WES according to the manufacturer's protocol (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA) [19]. Briefly, cells were directly lysed on ice with lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), sonicated, and supernatant was collected. Protein concentration was measured with BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Burlington, MA, USA). Protein samples (2 μg), blocking reagent, wash buffer, primary antibodies, secondary antibodies, and chemiluminescent substrate were prepared and dispensed into the assay plate. Assay plate was then loaded into the instrument, and protein was separated into individual capillaries. Protein separation and detection was performed automatically on the individual capillaries. For the primary antibodies, p-eNOS pan class="Chemical">ser1177 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and HPRT (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were used with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies provided by ProteinSimple.

Spheroid formation assay

Spheroid formation assay was performed in ultra-low attachment round bottom 96 well plates (Nexcelom, Lawrence, MA, USA) [20]. Cells (1 × 10ˆ3) were plated in each well with serum-free DMEM supplemented with 20 ng/mL pan class="Gene">bFGF and B-27 (1:50) with or without DETA/NO or l-NAME and incubated in CO2 incubator. Media was supplemented on day 4. Image of spheroid was captured, and diameter of spheroid was measured with Celigo Imaging Cytometer (Nexcelom) on day 9 after seeding the cells for spheroid formation.

Immunofluorescence labeling and image acquisition

Immunofluorescence labeling, and image acquisition was performed as described previously with some modifications [15]. Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (pan class="Chemical">PBS; Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan) for 15 min, washed with PBS, and suspended in ice-cold methanol for 10 min at −20 °C. Cells were then blocked with PBS containing 5% fetal calf serum and 0.3% Triton X100, followed by incubation with primary antibody for overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies against P-MEK (Cell Signaling Technology) and P-ERK (Cell Signaling Technology) were suspended in PBS containing 1% FCS and 0.3% Triton X100 at 1:100 dilution and used for the assay. Cells were then treated with AlexaFluor 555- or AlexaFluor 488-labeled anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent containing the nuclear counterstain DAPI (Invitrogen). Fluorescent signal was visualized and photographed with a BZ-9000 fluorescence microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) using a 20× Plan fluorescence lens (N.A 0.45) with BZ filters for Texas Red, GFP, and DAPI. Representative images were uniformly processed in Adobe Photoshop using the brightness and contrast tools. To count the number of P-MEK or pan class="Gene">P-ERK high, intermediate or low expressing cells, we analyzed the images with the Image J software program (Supplemental Fig. 2 for P-MEK and Supplemental Fig. 3 for P-ERK). We first used DAPI images and counted the number of cell nuclei per image, which represents the total number of cells per image. Next, the anti-P-MEK or anti-P-ERK antibody-stained images were converted into 8-bit grayscale images. The thresholding tool of the Image J software program, which can separate the pixels that fall within a desired range of intensity values from those which do not, was used to separate the cells with low, intermediate, or high accumulation of P-MEK or P-ERK. The criteria for the cells containing low, intermediate, or high ubiquitylated proteins accumulation were stated in figure legends. The number of cells ranged from 19 to 86 per group.

In vivo metastasis model

The Animal Care and Use Committee (National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD) approved the protocols. Male NOD scid gamma pan class="Species">mice (NSG mice) were supplied by the National Institutes of Health, USA. Mice were received at 5 weeks of age, housed five per cage, and given autoclaved food and water ad libitum. Experiments were performed at 7 weeks of age in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, Washington, DC). WCC and INV suspended in PBS with 2% Matrigel were prepared and 2 × 10ˆ5 cells/100 μL were injected into the spleens of anesthetized mice. Designated groups of animals were treated with l-NAME in the drinking water at a concentration of 0.5 g/L for the duration of the experiment [21]. On day 25, mice were euthanized, and spleen, liver and lung were harvested. Spleen and liver were weighed immediately after the harvest, and liver and lung were fixed with Bouin's solution. Forty-eight hours later, liver and lung were washed thrice with 70% ethanol and placed in 70% ethanol solution for 48 h. Metastatic colonies were counted under stereoscopic microscope.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student's t-test or ANOVA. P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Invaded pancreatic cancer cells are associated with increased invasiveness and resistance to C-ion radiation

To investigate the effect of C-ion radiation on metastatic pan class="Disease">pancreatic cancer, the classical Boyden chamber invasion assay was used to collect aggressive cells that invaded through Matrigel. We found that only about 1% of PANC-1 cells successfully invaded through the Matrigel. This percentage of INV is comparable to the number of cancer stem-like cells (CSC) that are speculated to be present within a population of cancer cell lines cultured in vitro [22]. To study whether INV have higher invasiveness compared to WCC, a re-invasion assay was performed (Supplemental Fig. 1). INV showed 2.24 ± 0.14 times higher invasiveness compared to WCC on Day 1 after collection from the undersurface of transwell membranes. The increased invasiveness of INV although not transient, was short lived and returned to the basal level by Day 11 (Fig. 1A). Therapy resistance being a hallmark of metastatic cells, we then examined the radio-sensitivity of INV and WCC by performing colony formation assay after X-ray or C-ion irradiation to assess if the invasive cells were also resistant to radio-therapy. While there were no observable differences in sensitivity of INV or WCC towards X-ray radiation, C-ion radiation induced a dose dependent decrease in survival of both WCC and INV, with INV showing significantly higher resistance to C-ion radiation compared to WCC (Fig. 1B). A comparison of surviving fraction between X-ray and C-ion RT showed that the dosage of X-ray required to elicit a similar response to C-ion RT was two to three times higher [23]. This data supports higher effectiveness of C-ion RT but at the same time suggests increased aggressiveness and higher resistance of INV. Thus, the use of focused irradiation for pancreatic cancer treatment may leave behind the recalcitrant cells with the INV phenotype which may subsequently lead to metastatic disease and relapse.
Fig. 1

Invaded pancreatic cancer cells were associated with increased invasiveness and resistance to C-ion radiation (A) Whole cultured PANC-1 cells (WCC) and INV collected from underneath of transwell membranes were used for invasion assay as shown in Supplemental Fig. 1. Number of invaded cells were counted, and ratio of invaded cells of INV group to WCC group was summarized in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. ***P < 0.001. (B) Surviving fraction of X-ray- or C-ion-irradiated WCC or INV cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Invaded pancreatic cancer cells were associated with increased invasiveness and resistance to C-ion radiation (A) Whole cultured PANC-1 cells (WCC) and INV collected from underneath of transwell membranes were used for invasion assay as shown in Supplemental Fig. 1. Number of invaded cells were counted, and ratio of invaded cells of INV group to WCC group was summarized in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. ***P < 0.001. (B) Surviving fraction of X-ray- or C-ion-irradiated WCC or INV cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Low flux of NO significantly induces PANC-1 invasion

Previously, we have shown that the population of PANC-1 invading cells showed increased NO production upon C-ion radiation, and that a pan-NOS inhibitor, L-NMMA, was effective in reducing this invasion [15]. L-NMMA was also effective at decreasing the invasiveness of non-irradiated PANC-1 cells thereby indicating an involvement of NO in determining invasiveness of PANC-1 cells. To further elucidate which NOS isoform was involved in this abrogation of invasiveness, in the current study, we first inhibited NOS2 with the specific inhibitor, 1400W. 1400W showed a marginal but significant reduction in invasiveness of PANC-1, while l-NAME, a pan NOS inhibitor effectively suppressed invasion (Fig. 2A), suggesting that NO-induced invasiveness is tightly regulated and NOS2 along with other NOS isoforms may play a contributing role. The effect of NO can be dramatically different depending on their concentration, and low flux NO is known to activate soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) pathway [24]. Recently, NOS3, producing low flux NO, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with development of invasive pancreatic lesions [25]. To further probe the role of NO-sGC pathway in our study, ODQ, a soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor was utilized that would inhibit effects downstream of NO-sGC pathway. Although the reduction level was not as effective as l-NAME, ODQ also significantly reduced invasiveness suggesting the importance of NO-sGC pathway in PANC-1 invasion. These results suggest that the flux of NO and the stage in the metastatic process at which NO is produced may determine invasiveness. To assess this in vitro, we next compared NO levels from INV and WCC cells in serum free medium, which is the same condition as the invasion assay. From the result, we found that 0.02% of all INV cells were DAF positive. This NO flux, although low, was significantly higher than DAF positive cells within the WCC, where only 0.001% of all WCC cells were DAF positive (Fig. 2B, Attached group). During invasion, cancer cells exhibit a series of adhesion/detachment events [26]. Detachment from ECM is observed as in the contractile machinery of amoeboid movement, as well as in the focal adhesion disassembly and detachment of the trailing edge observed in mesenchymal cell movement [27]. To address the effect of detachment from ECM on NO flux, the number of DAF-positive INV cells in suspension in serum-free medium for 1.5 h was compared to adherent cells, since cancer cells often form floating cell clusters when they are suspended in serum-free medium [28,29], and PANC-1 cells suspended in serum-free medium remain non-adherent and do not attach to the culture dish (Data not shown). Results from immunofluorescence staining showed that the number of DAF-positive cells in INV was 0.34% compared to 0.19% in WCC (Fig. 2B, Suspended group). While the fluorescent signal of DAF-positive cells increased in both WCC and INV with prolonged suspension, these signals were significantly higher in INV (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, we used Griess assay and measured nitrite levels in the culture medium of WCC and INV, since cellular nitrite (NO2−) levels are historically measured to corroborate the presence of NO [30]. Consistent with Fig. 2C, suspension of INV in serum-free medium for 4 h produced 69.4 nM more nitrite than WCC, which was detectable after spiking both sets of samples with a known concentration of sodium nitrite in order to bring the nitrite levels within the detection limits of Griess assay. Our data thus show that the NO flux would be different at various stages of metastasis and that detachment from the ECM triggers a burst in NO production which in turn could facilitate the active invasive process.
Fig. 2

Low flux of NO significantly induced PANC-1 invasion (A) Invasion assay was performed with using 1400W (20 μM), ODQ (1 μM), or l-NAME (500 μM). Percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **< 0.01. (B) WCC or INV of either dish-adherent (attached) or suspended in serum free medium (suspended), were stained with DAF-FM, and visualized with fluorescent microscopy. Percent of DAF-positive cells were calculated as the number of DAF-positive cells divided by the number of total cells counted from bright field image (n = 3). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. (C) Fluorescent signals of DAF-positive WCC or INV in suspended condition were measured with plate reader for 17 h. WCC: DAF-stained WCC, INV: DAF-stained INV, WCC No staining or INV No staining: WCC or INV without staining with DAF-FM, respectively (n = 3). ***P < 0.001. (D) DAF-FM fluorescent signals of 4 h-suspended INV were measured with plate reader, and compared to the signals of standard curve established with different concentrations of DETA/NO added into medium (n = 3). (E) Invasion assay was performed with using l-NAME (500 μM) with or without appropriate concentration of DETA/NO. Percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. **P < 0.01, *** < 0.001 (F–H) NOS1, NOS2, NOS3 mRNA expressions were detected with using RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels to those of attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Expression of phosphorylated NOS3 proteins were examined with Capillary western blot and bands were shown.

Low flux of NO significantly induced PANC-1 invasion (A) Invasion assay was performed with using 1400W (20 μM), ODQ (1 μM), or l-NAME (500 μM). Percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **< 0.01. (B) WCC or INV of either dish-adherent (attached) or suspended in serum free medium (suspended), were stained with DAF-FM, and visualized with fluorescent microscopy. Percent of DAF-positive cells were calculated as the number of DAF-positive cells divided by the number of total cells counted from bright field image (n = 3). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. (C) Fluorescent signals of DAF-positive WCC or INV in suspended condition were measured with plate reader for 17 h. WCC: DAF-stained WCC, INV: DAF-stained INV, WCC No staining or INV No staining: WCC or INV without staining with DAF-FM, respectively (n = 3). ***P < 0.001. (D) DAF-FM fluorescent signals of 4 h-suspended INV were measured with plate reader, and compared to the signals of standard curve established with different concentrations of DETA/NO added into medium (n = 3). (E) Invasion assay was performed with using l-NAME (500 μM) with or without appropriate concentration of DETA/NO. Percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. **P < 0.01, *** < 0.001 (F–H) NOS1, NOS2, NOS3 mRNA expressions were detected with using RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels to those of attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Expression of phosphorylated NOS3 proteins were examined with Capillary western blot and bands were shown. It is well known that low NO concentrations promote cell survival, whereas high levels induce cell death [24,[31], [32], [33]]. Hence, next we attempted to elucidate the NO fluxes that determine cancer cell invasiveness in vitro. Using NO donors, such as pan class="Chemical">DETA/NO, we can establish the specific concentration of NO and map the signaling pathways regulated at different NO levels; DETA/NO generates approximately a steady state NO flux in the nM range for the corresponding uM concentration of exogenous NO (ie., 1000 times lower flux) [31]. We have previously shown that at 3 h i.e.; conditions similar to those used in the current study, 100 μM DETA/NO in medium produces a NO flux of approximately 60 nM, measured by the Sievers Nitric Oxide Analyzer [34]. In addition, it has been shown that low concentrations of DETA/NO - about 25 μM–∼100 μM that produces NO fluxes similar to the levels produced by NOS1 and NOS3, can effectively induce cell proliferation/survival, whereas NO produced by DETA/NO with higher than 100 μM–∼500 μM (NOS2 level) induces anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects [31,33]. The fluorescent signal level produced with 4 h-suspended INV (INVS) was found to be similar to those obtained with 25 μM DETA/NO (Fig. 2D), suggesting that NO levels observed in INVS were in the range produced by NOS1 or NOS3, which has been identified as conducive to cell survival [24,31,33]. Concordantly, staining INVS with DAF-FM and 7AAD (apoptosis marker) showed that DAF-positive cells were clearly distinct from the 7AAD-positive population (Supplemental Fig. 4). In addition, IncuCyte live cell imaging of DAF stained cells showed that DAF-positive cells did not take up PI and thus, NO-production was not associated with stress related to an onset of cell death pathways (Supplemental Fig. 5). To further examine NO mediated regulation of invasiveness in the pan class="Disease">tumor micro-environment, the effect of exogenous NO on l-NAME inhibited PANC-1 invasion was studied. l-NAME treated PANC-1 showed reduced invasiveness compared to the non-treated cells, and addition of 25 μM DETA/NO restored the invasiveness of l-NAME-treated cells. The ability of NO to restore invasiveness reduced at higher concentration of 100 μM DETA/NO (Fig. 2E). Overall, these results suggest that low flux of NO plays a significant role in regulation and maintenance of cell survival and invasion in PANC-1 INVs. Consistent with the low fluxes of NO, as expected, NOS1 and NOS3 were drastically upregulated in INVS (Fig. 2F–H), whereas, in the case of WCC, treating cells simply with serum-free DMEM increased levels of NOS1 and NOS3 and these levels did not change significantly even when the cells were suspended for 4 h (WCCS), suggesting that NOS is differentially regulated between INV and WCC. It is well known that the activation of NOS3 proteins are regulated by phosphorylation [35]. A comparison of phosphorylation of NOS3 protein in INVS versus WCCS showed a significant increase in p-NOS3 in INVS (Fig. 2H), thereby suggesting a NOS3 mediated signaling in INVS. Furthermore, the number of DAF-positive INV cells drastically decreased with pan class="Chemical">l-NAME treatment (Supplemental Fig. 6), thus l-NAME would be a good candidate diminishing NO production of INVs. Recently, the role of l-NAME has been implicated in survival of Kras mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer [36]. Oncogenic mutation of Kras is common in most pancreatic tumors, and we have also confirmed that PANC-1 that we used in this study has Kras mutation [37]. Thus, l-NAME may enhance the therapeutic benefits afforded by C-ion RT by multiple mechanisms.

Nitric Oxide Synthases induce expression of pro-metastatic genes in INVS cells

To determine the possible role of NO in expression of pro-metastatic genes, levels of several pro-metastatic genes were analyzed with RT-PCR with or without l-NAME. The transcription of pan class="Gene">matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9), the protease which degrades the ECM and hence paves the way for induction of metastatic spread [38], was increased in both WCCS and INVS, but the levels were much higher in INVS (Fig. 3A). S100A8 and Lysyl oxidase (LOX), which play important roles in metastatic niche formation [39,40] were significantly upregulated in INVS, compared to WCCS (Fig. 3B and C). CXCR4, a chemokine receptor that is upregulated during metastasis [41], was also overexpressed in INVS (Fig. 3D). l-NAME treatment significantly hampered the upregulation of MMP9, S100A8, and CXCR4 in INVS indicating that NO regulates the induction of these genes. Examination of E-cadherin, a transmembrane glycoprotein localized in adherent junctions and its loss is implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer metastasis [42], showed low level of expression in INV, whereas WCC showed increased levels of E-cadherin in both attached or suspended condition (Fig. 3E). Overall, this data showed that INV are primed for metastasis as observed by higher induction of pro-metastatic genes in non-adherent condition with NO production by INVS being the critical determinant leading to the induction of this highly metastatic, mesenchymal-like phenotype.
Fig. 3

Nitric Oxide Synthases induced expression of pro-metastatic genes in INVs cells Messenger RNA expressions of MMP-9 (A), S100A8 (B), LOX (C), CXCR4 (D), and E-Cadherin (E), were detected with RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels over attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). **< 0.01, ***< 0.001.

Nitric Oxide Synthases induced expression of pro-metastatic genes in pan class="Gene">INVs cells Messenger RNA expressions of MMP-9 (A), S100A8 (B), LOX (C), CXCR4 (D), and E-Cadherin (E), were detected with RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels over attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). **< 0.01, ***< 0.001.

NO induces cancer stem cell-like phenotype in INVS

To form a metastatic colony at a distant organ, cancer cells must survive and grow at the metastatic site [20], and stemness properties, such as self-renewal and pan class="Disease">tumorigenic properties, are important to form the metastatic colony [43]. The expression of stemness-related genes, CD133, ALDH1, NANOG, SOX2 were all significantly enhanced in INVS cells (Fig. 4A–D), indicating that non-adherent condition/detachment from ECM triggers the induction of these genes. The stemness-related genes in WCCS were also upregulated but the levels were not as substantial as in INVS (Fig. 4A–D). Furthermore, l-NAME was effective in reducing CD133, ALDH1, NANOG and SOX2 inductions observed in INVS, suggesting that NO plays a role in upregulating these genes in INVS.
Fig. 4

NO induced cancer stem cell-like phenotype in INVs Messenger RNA expressions of CD133 (A), ALDH1 (B), NANOG (C), and SOX2 (D), were detected with RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels to those of attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. (E) Spheroid formation assay in ultra-low attachment dish was performed with using WCC and INV. Spheroid area on Day 9 was measured and summarized in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. Representative spheroid image of each group was shown.

NO induced cancer stem cell-like phenotype in pan class="Gene">INVs Messenger RNA expressions of CD133 (A), ALDH1 (B), NANOG (C), and SOX2 (D), were detected with RT-PCR. Ratio of expression levels to those of attached-WCC FCS+ was calculated and shown in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. (E) Spheroid formation assay in ultra-low attachment dish was performed with using WCC and INV. Spheroid area on Day 9 was measured and summarized in graph (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. Representative spheroid image of each group was shown. The ability of cells to form spheroids in vitro in defined, serum-free media is often used as the assay to confirm stem cell-like phenotype by assessing the self-renewal capability of cells. To confirm the stemness properties of INV, the spheroid formation ability of pan class="Gene">INV in ultra-low attachment dishes was examined. INV were collected from underneath the transwell membranes and were compared to the spheroid formation ability of WCC. The spheroid area on day 9 showed that INV formed significantly larger spheroids than WCC (Fig. 4E), and the higher ability of spheroid formation observed in INV was slightly but significantly reduced with l-NAME (Fig. 4E). The reduction of spheroid-genesis by l-NAME was restored upon addition of low dose DETA/NO (25 μM) whereas higher dose of DETA/NO (100 μM) had no significant effect on spheroid-genesis, suggesting that low flux of NO induces the increased spheroid-genesis as observed in INV. Although we observe that NO can regulate the expression of several ‘stemness’-related genes, the exact mechanism involved in the regulation of spheroid formation ability must be investigated further.

MEK-ERK pathway is activated in INVs and has a role in PANC-1 invasion

Low flux of NO produced via NOS3 has been demonstrated to activate pan class="Gene">MEK-ERK and JAK-STAT pathways [44], and activation of these pathways is known to induce pro-metastatic and CSC-related genes [[45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]]. NOS2 is also known to activate MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT pathways [51], which can induce CSC related genes [[45], [46], [47],51,52]. Thus, MEK-ERK, JAK-STAT and PI3-AKT pathways may be important in INV. We have previously reported that PI3K-AKT pathway was activated in PANC-1 INV compared to WCC, and PI3K inhibitors, LY294002 or Wortmannin, reduced PANC-1 invasion by over 40% [15]. To examine the role of MEK-ERK pathway in PANC-1 invasion, cells were treated with 0.5 nM or 10 nM, MEK inhibitor, U0126 or 1 nM or 10 nM, ERK inhibitor, ERK inhibitor 1. Inhibition of MEK-ERK pathway reduced PANC-1 invasion by 39% or 74%, respectively in the presence of 0.5 nM or 10 nM U0126, while 1 nM or 10 nM ERK inhibitor 1 blocked invasion by 40% or 48%, respectively (Fig. 5A). In contrast, JAK inhibitor, JAK inhibitor 1 at 0.1 μM or 5 μM, had no significant effect on blocking PANC-1 invasion (Fig. 5A), suggesting that PANC-1 invasiveness is mediated by MEK-ERK pathway, but not JAK pathway. The role of MEK-ERK and JAK-STAT pathway in cell survival is well established [53]. To verify that the reduced invasiveness is not a result of cell death, the effect of the inhibitors was examined on cell survival. Compared to control, U0126 (10 nM), ERK inhibitor 1 (10 nM), or JAK inhibitor 1 (5 μM) reduced cell survival by 15%, 9%, or 5%, respectively (Supplemental Fig. 7) while same concentrations of U0126 or ERK inhibitor 1 inhibited PANC-1 invasion by 74%, or 48% respectively (Fig. 5A). Thus, MEK-ERK pathway is involved in PANC-1 invasiveness.
Fig. 5

MEK-ERK pathway was activated in INVs and had role in PANC-1 invasion (A) Invasion assay was performed with using U0126, ERK inhibitor II or JAK inhibitor I, and percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. (B–C) WCC or INV suspended with serum-free medium with or without DETA/NO (25 μM) or l-NAME (500 μM) for 4 h were used for immunofluorescent study. (D–E) WCC suspended with serum-free medium with appropriate concentration of DETA/NO with or without 10 μM U0126 for 4 h were used for immunofluorescent study. Number of P-MEKhigh, P-MEKintermediate or P-MEKlow (B, D) or P-ERKhigh, P-ERKintermediate or P-ERKlow (C, E) were counted and percent of each populations were shown in graph. (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01. Representative image of each group was shown.

MEK-pan class="Gene">ERK pathway was activated in INVs and had role in PANC-1 invasion (A) Invasion assay was performed with using U0126, ERK inhibitor II or JAK inhibitor I, and percent of invaded cells were shown in graph. Data are presented as mean ± SDs of triplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. (B–C) WCC or INV suspended with serum-free medium with or without DETA/NO (25 μM) or l-NAME (500 μM) for 4 h were used for immunofluorescent study. (D–E) WCC suspended with serum-free medium with appropriate concentration of DETA/NO with or without 10 μM U0126 for 4 h were used for immunofluorescent study. Number of P-MEKhigh, P-MEKintermediate or P-MEKlow (B, D) or P-ERKhigh, P-ERKintermediate or P-ERKlow (C, E) were counted and percent of each populations were shown in graph. (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **< 0.01. Representative image of each group was shown. To examine the difference in MEK-pan class="Gene">ERK activation in WCCs and INVs cells, we next stained WCCs and INVs with P-MEK or P-ERK antibody. As expected, INVs contains higher number of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh cells compared to WCCs (Fig. 5B–C). Interestingly, number of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh cells were increased with addition of 25 μM DETA/NO to WCC (Fig. 5B–C), whereas treatment of INV with l-NAME, reduced p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh population (Fig. 5B–C), indicating that number of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh cells was regulated by specific NO flux. In addition, treating WCC with 25 μM DETA/NO, whose NO level is similar to those produced by INVs, significantly increased p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh cell numbers, whereas lower dose of DETA/NO, 5 μM, similar to the NO level that WCC produces, or higher dose of DETA/NO, 100 μM, has no significant effect or reduced effect on induction of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh population (Fig. 5D–E). Furthermore, we confirmed that increased effect of 25 μM DETANO on p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh population was diminished with addition of MEK inhibitor, U0126 (Fig. 5D–E). Over all, these results suggest a NO flux-dependent induction of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh population.

Nitric oxide synthases mediate the in vivo metastatic spread of highly invasive INV

So far, we found that suspension of INV in non-adherent conditions, in serum-free media triggers the induction of low level of NO production, which may have significant roles in the expression of several pro-metastatic and stemness-related genes. In addition, upregulation of many of these genes in pan class="Gene">INVS were reduced with l-NAME treatment. We used NSG mice to clarify whether INV have higher ability to metastasize in vivo, and if NO regulates this metastatic ability. Mice were injected with WCC (WCC group) or INV (INV group) into their spleen, and designated groups of animals were treated with l-NAME by administering l-NAME in the drinking water (INV + l-NAME group). Twenty-five days after injection, spleen, liver and lungs were harvested. There was no significant change in body weight between groups during the experiment (Fig. 6A). The average number of metastatic colonies in lung was less than 2 in all the groups, and there was no significant difference in lung metastasis between INV and WCC groups (Fig. 6B). In contrast, in the case of liver metastasis, INV group showed 14.4 ± 12 colonies compared to 3.5 ± 2.4 colonies for WCC group demonstrating significant increase in organ specific metastasis. These higher number of metastatic colonies in INV group were dramatically suppressed to 5.4 ± 4.2 colonies in the presence of l-NAME (Fig. 6C). Histometric analysis of H&E-stained mouse liver sections confirmed that INV did have higher ability to metastasize specially to liver in our model, and l-NAME was effective in reducing this metastatic ability (Fig. 6D).
Fig. 6

Nitric oxide synthases mediated the (A) Mice body weights of WCC, INV or INV + l-NAME group were measured on alternate days, and summarized in graph (n = 10). (B) On day 25, lung and liver were harvested and fixed with Bouin's solution, and 48 h later, lung and liver were replaced with 70% ethanol. Number of metastatic colony of lung (B), or liver (C) was shown in graph. *P < 0.05 (D) Representative images of H&E-stained mouse liver sections were shown.

Nitric oxide synthases mediated the (A) pan class="Species">Mice body weights of WCC, INV or INV + l-NAME group were measured on alternate days, and summarized in graph (n = 10). (B) On day 25, lung and liver were harvested and fixed with Bouin's solution, and 48 h later, lung and liver were replaced with 70% ethanol. Number of metastatic colony of lung (B), or liver (C) was shown in graph. *P < 0.05 (D) Representative images of H&E-stained mouse liver sections were shown.

Discussion

Cell invasion through ECM pan class="Gene">involves complex regulation of cell adhesion to and detachment from ECM proteins [26,27,54,55]. Specially, in the case of amoeboid movement, spherical cells lacking defined adhesions translocate by forming blebs or smooth membrane protrusions [27,[56], [57], [58]]. We had previously reported that PANC-1 forms a spherical shape to invade through Matrigel [11], indicating that PANC-1 INV uses amoeboid movement, lacking defined adhesions, for invasion. In this study, we find that detachment and suspension of PANC-1 INV in vitro in non-adherent conditions, induced NO production which in turn plays an important role in maintaining cell function in suspended cells, and detachment of normal, non-cancerous epithelial cells from ECM causes ATP depletion through reduced glucose uptake, and increased oxidative stress subsequently leading to anoikis, a form of programmed cell death [59]. Consistent with this idea, NO flux produced from INVS was low and within the range that is known to be effective in promoting cell survival, and flow cytometry data or real-time PCR analysis suggested that NO-producing cells were clearly distinct from the apoptotic cells. In addition, the fluxes of NO produced by INVs induced higher number of p-MEKhigh or p-ERKhigh cells, whose activation is known to increase cell survival [53]. Also, decreased adhesiveness with resistance to anoikis has been reported in circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer [60]. Thus, the ability of cells to produce low levels of NO under non-adherent conditions, such as fluxes produced by INVS, may be one of the important factors aiding in successful survival in detached conditions and subsequent metastatic spread. Concordantly, INV showed higher metastasis in NSG mouse model. Several stemness-related genes were upregulated in INVS. Thus, pan class="Gene">INVS cells may harbor the CSC phenotype. However, expression of CD44, a CSC marker for pancreatic cancer [1], was not higher in INV compared to WCC (data not shown) and there were no differences in cell doubling time between INV and WCC. Thus, INV cells do not conform to the currently used description of a ‘pancreatic CSC’. However, considering that the genetic background of INV and WCC are identical, it is intriguing that INV cell population, isolated from the identical parental cell line, PANC-1, exhibits such unique aggressive characteristics. Thus, it may be important to study the possible involvement of epigenetics in the regulation of INV, as we observed that higher invasiveness in re-invasion assay was transient and returned to basal level after culturing INV in vitro for 11 days. The mesenchymal nature of INVS is further confirmed by the reduced pan class="Gene">E-cadherin expression [42] observed in INV compared to WCC. However, no reduction in expression was observed with l-NAME, suggesting that NOS may not be directly involved in EMT but in the later steps of the invasive process, indicated by the induction of CSC markers; MMP9, involved in initiating the extravasation from primary site [38]; CXCR4 [41]; as well as formation of the pre-metastatic niche by S100A8 [39]. LOX which is involved in the crosslinking of collagen and elastins to form the local ECM during the establishment of micrometastasis prior to the infiltration of the niche with tumor cells and myeloid cells [40], is independent of NOS. A recent paper reported that both NOS3 and NOS2 have roles in promoting CSC phenotype [61,62]. Interestingly, l-NAME effectively suppressed the upregulation of metastatic or CSC-related genes (Figs. 3 and 4), but single treatment with pan class="Chemical">ODQ or 1400W had no significant effect on reducing these gene levels (data not shown). Concomitantly, l-NAME suppressed invasion, whereas 1400W or ODQ only slightly reduced invasiveness. Thus, NOS2 and NOS1 and/or NOS3 together induce metastatic and CSC property of INV, although there was no significant difference in NOS1 or NOS2 expression between WCC and INV, and only NOS3 expression and NOS3 phosphorylation were enhanced in INV. Previously, overexpression of NOS3 has been reported in pancreatic cancer which increases nitrosylation and activation of Ras [63,64]. In addition, NOS3, producing low flux NO, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with development of invasive pancreatic lesions [25]. Low flux of NO that NOS1 or NOS3 produces is known to activate sGC pathway [31,33], and it appears that cGMP has a powerful role in the aggressive phenotype of certain cancers [65]. However, single treatment of ODQ, in this study, only slightly reduced invasiveness, suggesting that there are multiple mechanisms through which NO leads to increased PANC-1 invasion. Overall, our data showed that NOS2 and NOS1 and/or NOS3 together induce metastatic and CSC property of INV, and hence, NO plays important roles in several steps of metastasis leading to higher in vivo metastatic ability of INV cells compared to WCC in NSG mice. We also treated WCC-injected pan class="Species">mice with l-NAME. In the case of WCC bearing mice, l-NAME enhanced their metastasis (data not shown), indicating that blocking NO production in WCC may activate other signaling pathways or activate other cell populations that do not produce NO, which enhances metastasis. We have not yet completely delineated the mechanisms of regulation of metastasis in WCC. In this context, flow cytometry data showed that there were only two kinds of populations in INV, which were either DAF-positive (NO-producing) cells or 7AAD-positive (apoptotic) cells, whereas, WCC exhibited a third population type, which did not take up DAF or 7AAD. It is possible that metastatic ability of DAF-negative 7AAD-negative population was activated with l-NAME (mechanism unknown), which caused the enhanced in vivo metastatic ability of WCC in presence of l-NAME. Since NO induction as well as pro-metastatic or stemness related genes were differently regulated in WCC, further studies will investigate how metastatic ability is regulated in WCC. In a previous study, we used 31 cancer cell lines to examine whether C-ion radiation affects pan class="Disease">cancer cell invasiveness and found that C-ion radiation was effective to reduce invasion of many cell lines, but PANC-1 was the exception [37]. From the present study, it is indicative that the number of PANC-1 INV within the total number of PANC-1 cells may increase after C-ion radiation, because INV can survive better after C-ion radiation. l-NAME can effectively block the metastatic ability of such INV. Thus, l-NAME would be a promising candidate for use as an adjuvant for effective radiotherapy by blocking these radio-resistant and highly metastatic INV type of cells.
  63 in total

Review 1.  The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix.

Authors:  P Friedl; E B Bröcker
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel.

Authors:  Renaud Poincloux; Olivier Collin; Floria Lizárraga; Maryse Romao; Marcel Debray; Matthieu Piel; Philippe Chavrier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Key biological processes driving metastatic spread of pancreatic cancer as identified by multi-omics studies.

Authors:  T Y S Le Large; M F Bijlsma; G Kazemier; H W M van Laarhoven; E Giovannetti; C R Jimenez
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 15.707

4.  Perivascular nitric oxide activates notch signaling and promotes stem-like character in PDGF-induced glioma cells.

Authors:  Nikki Charles; Tatsuya Ozawa; Massimo Squatrito; Anne-Marie Bleau; Cameron W Brennan; Dolores Hambardzumyan; Eric C Holland
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Campbell; Shinichi Yachida; Laura J Mudie; Philip J Stephens; Erin D Pleasance; Lucy A Stebbings; Laura A Morsberger; Calli Latimer; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena A Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Constance A Griffin; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Michael A Quail; Michael R Stratton; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Carbon-ion radiation enhances migration ability and invasiveness of the pancreatic cancer cell, PANC-1, in vitro.

Authors:  Mayumi Fujita; Yoshimi Otsuka; Kaori Imadome; Satoshi Endo; Shigeru Yamada; Takashi Imai
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 7.  Never let it go: Stopping key mechanisms underlying metastasis to fight pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Giovannetti; C L van der Borden; A E Frampton; A Ali; O Firuzi; G J Peters
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 15.707

8.  Nitric oxide increases the invasion of pancreatic cancer cells via activation of the PI3K-AKT and RhoA pathways after carbon ion irradiation.

Authors:  Mayumi Fujita; Kaori Imadome; Satoshi Endo; Yoshimi Shoji; Shigeru Yamada; Takashi Imai
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Metabolic characterization of invaded cells of the pancreatic cancer cell line, PANC-1.

Authors:  Mayumi Fujita; Kaori Imadome; Takashi Imai
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 10.  Tumor-Initiating Cells: a criTICal review of isolation approaches and new challenges in targeting strategies.

Authors:  Komal Qureshi-Baig; Pit Ullmann; Serge Haan; Elisabeth Letellier
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Gasotransmitters in the tumor microenvironment: Impacts on cancer chemotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Abbas Salihi; Mohammed A Al-Naqshabandi; Zhikal Omar Khudhur; Zjwan Housein; Harmand A Hama; Ramyar M Abdullah; Bashdar Mahmud Hussen; Twana Alkasalias
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.423

2.  Novel 1,2,4-triazine-quinoline hybrids: The privileged scaffolds as potent multi-target inhibitors of LPS-induced inflammatory response via dual COX-2 and 15-LOX inhibition.

Authors:  Amany M Ghanim; Samar Rezq; Tarek S Ibrahim; Damian G Romero; Hend Kothayer
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 7.088

Review 3.  Nitric Oxide and S-Nitrosylation in Cancers: Emphasis on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Deepshikha Mishra; Vaibhav Patel; Debabrata Banerjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2020-01-22

Review 4.  The Role of Nitric Oxide in Cancer: Master Regulator or NOt?

Authors:  Faizan H Khan; Eoin Dervan; Dibyangana D Bhattacharyya; Jake D McAuliffe; Katrina M Miranda; Sharon A Glynn
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  GPR87 Promotes Metastasis through the AKT-eNOS-NO Axis in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hye-Mi Ahn; Eun-Young Choi; Youn-Jae Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Membrane-camouflaged supramolecular nanoparticles for co-delivery of chemotherapeutic and molecular-targeted drugs with siRNA against patient-derived pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Honglin Tang; Yanan Xue; Bowen Li; Xiaojie Xu; Fu Zhang; Jiajing Guo; Qijun Li; Tingting Yuan; Yuan Chen; Yubin Pan; Yuan Ping; Da Li
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 14.903

Review 7.  Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current Standing and Methodologies.

Authors:  Marina Ayres Pereira; Iok In Christine Chio
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Metabolic characterization of aggressive breast cancer cells exhibiting invasive phenotype: impact of non-cytotoxic doses of 2-DG on diminishing invasiveness.

Authors:  Mayumi Fujita; Kaori Imadome; Veena Somasundaram; Miki Kawanishi; Kumiko Karasawa; David A Wink
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  New possible silver lining for pancreatic cancer therapy: Hydrogen sulfide and its donors.

Authors:  Xu Hu; Yan Xiao; Jianan Sun; Bao Ji; Shanshan Luo; Bo Wu; Chao Zheng; Peng Wang; Fanxing Xu; Keguang Cheng; Huiming Hua; Dahong Li
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 11.413

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.