Literature DB >> 30852022

Comparison of gene editing versus conventional breeding to introgress the POLLED allele into the US dairy cattle population.

M L Mueller1, J B Cole2, T S Sonstegard3, A L Van Eenennaam4.   

Abstract

Disbudding and dehorning are commonly used cattle management practices to protect animals and humans from injury. They are unpleasant, costly processes subject to increased public scrutiny as an animal welfare issue. Horns are a recessively inherited trait, so one option to eliminate dehorning is to breed for polled (hornlessness). However, due to the low genetic merit and scarcity of polled dairy sires, this approach has not been widely adopted. In March 2018, only 3 Holstein and 0 Jersey active homozygous polled sires were registered with the National Association of Animal Breeders. Alternatively, gene editing to produce high-genetic-merit polled sires has been proposed. To further explore this concept, introgression of the POLLED allele into both the US Holstein and Jersey cattle populations via conventional breeding or gene editing (top 1% of bulls/year) was simulated for 3 polled mating schemes and compared with baseline selection on lifetime net merit (NM$) alone, over the course of 20 yr. Scenarios were replicated 10 times and the changes in HORNED allele frequency, inbreeding, genetic gain (NM$), and number of unique sires used were calculated. Gene editing decreased the frequency of the HORNED allele to <0.1 after 20 yr, which was as fast or faster than conventional breeding for both breeds. In the mating scheme that required the use of only existing homozygous polled sires, inbreeding reached 17% (Holstein) and 14% (Jersey), compared with less than 7% in the baseline scenarios. However, gene editing in the same mating scheme resulted in significantly less inbreeding, 9% (Holstein) and 8% (Jersey). Also, gene editing resulted in significantly higher NM$ after 20 yr compared with conventional breeding for both breeds. Additionally, the gene editing scenarios of both breeds used a significantly greater number of unique sires compared with either the conventional breeding or baseline scenarios. Overall, our simulations show that, given the current genetic merit of horned and polled dairy sires, the use of conventional breeding methods to decrease the frequency of the HORNED allele will increase inbreeding and slow genetic improvement. Furthermore, this study demonstrates how gene editing could be used to rapidly decrease the frequency of the HORNED allele in US dairy cattle populations while maintaining the rate of genetic gain, constraining inbreeding to acceptable levels, and simultaneously addressing an emerging animal welfare concern. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Holstein; Jersey; gene editing; polled; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852022     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Complex and Diverse Genetic Architecture of the Absence of Horns (Polledness) in Domestic Ruminants, including Goats and Sheep.

Authors:  Rebecca Simon; Cord Drögemüller; Gesine Lühken
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Optimized Genetic Testing for Polledness in Multiple Breeds of Cattle.

Authors:  Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Brian M Burns; Michael R McGowan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Ben J Hayes; Ryan Ferretti; Karen M Schutt; Russell E Lyons
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Injury alters motivational trade-offs in calves during the healing period.

Authors:  Sarah J J Adcock; Cassandra B Tucker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of Gene Editing Versus Conventional Breeding to Introgress the POLLED Allele Into the Tropically Adapted Australian Beef Cattle Population.

Authors:  Maci L Mueller; John B Cole; Natalie K Connors; David J Johnston; Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  A deletion at the polled PC locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle.

Authors:  Sadie L Hennig; Joseph R Owen; Jason C Lin; Bret R McNabb; Alison L Van Eenennaam; James D Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Francis Z Naab; David Coles; Ellen Goddard; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03

7.  Simulating the Commercial Implementation of Gene-Editing for Influenza A Virus Resistance in Pigs: An Economic and Genetic Analysis.

Authors:  Hamish A Salvesen; Timothy J Byrne; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Fiona S Hely
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.141

8.  Genome Editing in Livestock, Complicity, and the Technological Fix Objection.

Authors:  Katrien Devolder
Journal:  J Agric Environ Ethics       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.727

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.