Literature DB >> 30851995

Single screw type of lag screw results higher reoperation rate in the osteosynthesis of basicervical hip fracture.

Jung-Taek Kim1, Yong-Chan Ha2, Chan-Ho Park3, Jun-Il Yoo4, Tae-Young Kim5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Basicervical hip fractures are relatively rare with greater biomechanical instability compared to the other types of hip fractures. Several studies have reported ambivalent surgical outcomes of basicervical hip fractures. The purpose of this multicenter study was to analyze surgical outcomes of basicervical hip fractures according to the fixation type of proximal femur and lag screw type.
METHODS: Among 3220 hip fractures, 145 were classified as basicervical hip fractures. Of those, 106 patients treated with osteosynthesis were included to analyze the surgical complications according to fixation type of proximal femur: sliding hip screw(SHS) and cephalomedullary nail (CMN) groups. Surgical complications including the excessive displacement of fracture and the occurrence of reoperation were evaluated at the final follow up. We further evaluated surgical complications according to lag screw type with subgroup analysis in CMN group: single screw type, blade type and two integrated screw type.
RESULTS: Ten patients (9.4%) sustained surgical complications (5 excessive displacements and 5 reoperations). For fixation type of proximal femur, SHS group showed higher tendency of excessive displacement despite no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.060). For lag screw type with subgroup analysis in CMN group, single screw type showed statistically high rates of reoperation compared to the other types of lag screw (p = 0.022).
CONCLUSION: Basicervical hip fractures treated with osteosynthesis resulted to high rates of surgical complications in this study. However, they could be drastically reduced if CMN with blade type or two integrated screw type were used in the osteosynthesis of basicervical hip fractures.
Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851995     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  5 in total

1.  Primary Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Ryan A Davis; Joseph D Henningsen; Scott Huff; Andrew D Schneider; Fady Y Hijji; Andrew Froehle; Indresh Venkatarayappa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-22

2.  Comparison of hip structure analysis and grip strength between femoral neck and basicervical fractures.

Authors:  Yong-Han Cha; Jun-Il Yoo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Cephalomedullary Nailing versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Cheol Yoon; Chul-Ho Kim; Yong Chan Kim; Hyung Keun Song
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.052

4.  Management of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures by Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Xiao-Hua Gu; Xi Li; Jian-Hong Wu; Yu-Feng Ju; Wei-Jie Huang; Qiu-Gen Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register.

Authors:  Jonas Sundkvist; Anders Brüggeman; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Michael Möller; Olof Wolf; Sebastian Mukka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.