Literature DB >> 30851977

The effects of squatting while pregnant on pelvic dimensions: A computational simulation to understand childbirth.

Andrea Hemmerich1, Teresa Bandrowska2, Geneviève A Dumas3.   

Abstract

Biomechanical complications of childbirth, such as obstructed labor, are a major cause of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. The impact of birthing position and mobility on pelvic alignment during labor has not been adequately explored. Our objective was to use a previously developed computational model of the female pelvis to determine the effects of maternal positioning and pregnancy on pelvic alignment. We hypothesized that loading conditions during squatting and increased ligament laxity during pregnancy would expand the pelvis. We simulated dynamic joint moments experienced during a squat movement under pregnant and non-pregnant conditions while tracking relevant anatomical landmarks on the innominate bones, sacrum, and coccyx; anteroposterior and transverse diameters, pubic symphysis width and angle, pelvic areas at the inlet, mid-plane, and outlet, were calculated. Pregnant simulation conditions resulted in greater increases in most pelvic measurements - and predominantly at the outlet - than for the non-pregnant simulation. Pelvic outlet diameters in anterior-posterior and transverse directions in the final squat posture increased by 6.1 mm and 11.0 mm, respectively, for the pregnant simulation compared with only 4.1 mm and 2.6 mm for the non-pregnant; these differences were considered to be clinically meaningful. Peak increases in diameter were demonstrated during the dynamic portion of the movement, rather than the final resting position. Outcomes from our computational simulation suggest that maternal joint loading in an upright birthing position, such as squatting, could open the outlet of the birth canal and dynamic activities may generate greater pelvic mobility than the comparable static posture.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ligament laxity; Pelvimetry; Pregnancy; Three-dimensional model; Upright birthing position

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851977     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test in Third Trimester Pregnant Women: Shifting Positions Affect Pelvic Biomechanics and Create More Room in Obstetric Diameters.

Authors:  Marco Siccardi; Cristina Valle; Fiorenza Di Matteo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 2.  Evaluating the effects of maternal positions in childbirth: An overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Marion Kibuka; Amy Price; Igho Onakpoya; Stephanie Tierney; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-12-21

3.  Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis.

Authors:  Caroline VanSickle; Kylea L Liese; Julienne N Rutherford
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Association of objectively measured physical fitness during pregnancy with maternal and neonatal outcomes. The GESTAFIT Project.

Authors:  Laura Baena-García; Irene Coll-Risco; Olga Ocón-Hernández; Lidia Romero-Gallardo; Pedro Acosta-Manzano; Linda May; Virginia A Aparicio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Postural Approach to the Pelvic Diameters of Obstetrics: The Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test.

Authors:  Marco Siccardi; Cristina Valle; Fiorenza Di Matteo; Valentina Angius
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-09

6.  Can the Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test in Late Pregnancy Reveal Obstructed and Prolonged Labor? Results From a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marco Siccardi; Cristina Valle
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.