Literature DB >> 30851642

Growth and metabolite production of a grape sour rot yeast-bacterium consortium on different carbon sources.

L Pinto1, M Malfeito-Ferreira2, L Quintieri3, A C Silva2, F Baruzzi3.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to evaluate possible sugar-based trophic interactions between acetic acid bacteria (AAB) and non-Saccharomyces yeasts (NSY) involved in table grape sour rot, a disease in which berries spoilage is caused by the accumulation of several microbial metabolites. Acetobacter syzygii LMG 21419 (As) and Candida zemplinina CBS 9494 (Cz), a simplified AAB-NSY association responsible for table grape sour rot, grew differently in a minimal medium (YP) supplemented with glucose, ethanol, acetic and gluconic acid under monoculture conditions. In As -Cz co-culture media, after 24 h of incubation, As showed high relative abundance in YP-ethanol, whereas Cz was the dominant strain in YP-glucose medium. Co-culture in YP-glucose showed that glucose was converted into ethanol by Cz that, in turn, promoted the growth of As population. Gluconic acid was the main bacterial metabolite from glucose in monoculture, whereas acetic acid putatively derived from ethanol oxidation was found only in co-culture. However, gluconic acid showed inhibitory effect against As whereas acetic acid mainly inhibited Cz. Negative effects of both metabolites were mitigated in the glucose-supplemented medium. The results suggest a possible metabolic- based temporal succession between AAB and NSY during grape sour rot development. At the begin of sour rot, low glucose concentration promotes NSY producing ethanol, then, the AAB could take advantage from the oxidation of ethanol into acetic acid, becoming the dominant microbial sour rot population during the late stages of the process.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetic acid; Co-culture; Gluconic acid; Oxidative fermentation; Sour rot; Temporal succession

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851642     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biotechnological Processes in Fruit Vinegar Production.

Authors:  Luz María Luzón-Quintana; Remedios Castro; Enrique Durán-Guerrero
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-26

2.  Diversity and spoilage potential of microbial communities associated with grape sour rot in eastern coastal areas of China.

Authors:  Huanhuan Gao; Xiangtian Yin; Xilong Jiang; Hongmei Shi; Yang Yang; Chaoping Wang; Xiaoyan Dai; Yingchun Chen; Xinying Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Comparison of bayberry fermented wine aroma from different cultivars by GC-MS combined with electronic nose analysis.

Authors:  Yuxi Cao; Zufang Wu; Peifang Weng
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  Health Promoting Properties of Cereal Vinegars.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kandylis; Argyro Bekatorou; Dimitra Dimitrellou; Iris Plioni; Kanella Giannopoulou
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  Microbial Composition of SCOBY Starter Cultures Used by Commercial Kombucha Brewers in North America.

Authors:  Keisha Harrison; Chris Curtin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-14

6.  Liquor Flavour Is Associated With the Physicochemical Property and Microbial Diversity of Fermented Grains in Waxy and Non-waxy Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) During Fermentation.

Authors:  Chunjuan Liu; Xiangwei Gong; Guan Zhao; Maw Ni Soe Htet; Zhiyong Jia; Zongke Yan; Lili Liu; Qinghua Zhai; Ting Huang; Xiping Deng; Baili Feng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.