| Literature DB >> 30851600 |
Duncan Taylor1, Emily Rowe2, Maarten Kruijver3, Damien Abarno4, Jo-Anne Bright3, John Buckleton5.
Abstract
A recent publication has provided the ability to compare two mixed DNA profiles and consider their probability of occurrence if they do, compared to if they do not, have a common contributor. This ability has applications to both quality assurance (to test for sample to sample contamination) and for intelligence gathering purposes (did the same unknown offender donate DNA to multiple samples). We use a mixture to mixture comparison tool to investigate the prevalence of sample to sample contamination that could occur from two laboratory mechanisms, one during DNA extraction and one during electrophoresis. By carrying out pairwise comparisons of all samples (deconvoluted using probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™) within extraction or run batches we identify any potential common DNA donors and investigate these with respect to their risk of contamination from the two proposed mechanisms. While not identifying any contamination, we inadvertently find a potential intelligence link between samples, showing the use of a mixture to mixture comparison tool for investigative purposes.Keywords: Contamination; Deconvolution; Extraction batch; Mixture comparison
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30851600 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Forensic Sci Int Genet ISSN: 1872-4973 Impact factor: 4.882