Literature DB >> 30851594

Dynamics of crAssphage as a human source tracking marker in potentially faecally polluted environments.

E Ballesté1, M Pascual-Benito2, J Martín-Díaz2, A R Blanch2, F Lucena2, M Muniesa2, J Jofre2, C García-Aljaro2.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that crAssphage is abundant in human faecal samples worldwide. It has thus been postulated as a potential microbial source tracking (MST) marker to detect human faecal pollution in water. However, an effective implementation of crAssphage in water management strategies will depend on an understanding of its environmental dynamics. In this work, the abundance and temporal distribution of crAssphage was analysed in the effluent of wastewater treatment plants using different sewage treatments, and in two rivers (water and sediments) that differ in pollution impact and flow regime. Additionally, the influence of environmental conditions (temperature and rainfall) on the removal of the marker was studied along a river section, and natural inactivation was assessed by a mesocosms approach. Molecular and culture-based tools were used to compare crAssphage abundance and dynamics with those of bacteria and bacteriophages currently applied as global indicators (E. coli, somatic coliphages, Bacteroides GA17 bacteriophages, and the human-associated MST markers HF183 and HMBif). CrAssphage concentrations in sewage effluent and river samples were similar to those of HF183 and HMBif and higher than other general and/or culture-based indicators (by 2-3 orders of magnitude). Measurement of crAssphage abundance revealed no temporal variability in the effluent, although rainfall events affected the dynamics, possibly through the mobilisation of sediments, where the marker was detected in high concentrations, and an increase in diffuse and point pollution. Another factor affecting crAssphage inactivation was temperature. Its persistence was longer compared with other bacterial markers analysed by qPCR but lower than culturable markers. The results of this study support the use of crAssphage as a human source tracking marker of faecal pollution in water, since it has similar abundances to other molecular human MST markers, yet with a longer persistence in the environment. Nevertheless, its use in combination with infectious bacteriophages is probably advisable.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental dynamics; Faecal indicators; Faecal pollution; Microbial source tracking; crAssphage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851594     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

Review 1.  Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologies.

Authors:  Shahbaz Raza; Jungman Kim; Michael J Sadowsky; Tatsuya Unno
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Performance Evaluation of Human-Specific Viral Markers and Application of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and CrAssphage to Environmental Water Samples as Fecal Pollution Markers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.

Authors:  Bikash Malla; Rajani Ghaju Shrestha; Sarmila Tandukar; Jeevan B Sherchand; Eiji Haramoto
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Applicability of crAssphage, pepper mild mottle virus, and tobacco mosaic virus as indicators of reduction of enteric viruses during wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Sarmila Tandukar; Samendra P Sherchan; Eiji Haramoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Novel Group of Promiscuous Podophages Infecting Diverse Gammaproteobacteria from River Communities Exhibits Dynamic Intergenus Host Adaptation.

Authors:  Adrian Cazares; Wendy Figueroa; Daniel Cazares; Gabriel Guarneros; Robert A Edwards; Pablo Vinuesa
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.496

5.  Quantification of human enteric viruses as alternative indicators of fecal pollution to evaluate wastewater treatment processes.

Authors:  Audrey Garcia; Tri Le; Paul Jankowski; Kadir Yanaç; Qiuyan Yuan; Miguel I Uyaguari-Diaz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Bacteriophages as Fecal Pollution Indicators.

Authors:  Daniel Toribio-Avedillo; Anicet R Blanch; Maite Muniesa; Lorena Rodríguez-Rubio
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.