Literature DB >> 30851256

Comparison between systemic and intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy in a primary health care unit.

Maria Cristina de Oliveira Duque1, José Jayme Quintão Silva2, Priscilla Andrade Oliveira Soares3, Rodrigo Sousa Magalhães3, Adriene Paiva Araújo Horta2, Lucia Regina Brahim Paes4, Marcelo Rosandiski Lyra4, Maria Inês Fernandes Pimentel4, Liliane de Fátima Antonio4, Érica de Camargo Ferreira E Vasconcellos5, Maurício Naoto Saheki4, Mauro Celio de Almeida Marzochi6, Cláudia Maria Valete-Rosalino7, Armando de Oliveira Schubach8.   

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is not a life-threatening condition. However, its treatment can cause serious adverse effects and may sometimes lead to death. Recently, safer local treatments have been included among therapies acceptable to New World CL cases, but the use of intralesional meglumine antimoniate (IL-MA) is recommended to be performed in reference centers, for patients with single cutaneous lesions <3 cm in diameter at any location except the head and periarticular regions; the volume of injected MA should not exceed 5 mL. In this study we compared two groups of patients with CL treated with MA in a primary health care unit in Brazil. Patients were treated with systemic MA (n = 76) or IL-MA (n = 30). In the IL-MA group, 93% of patients had one or more of the following lesion characteristics: two or more lesions, lesions >3 cm in diameter, lesions located in the head or in periarticular regions, or had been administered IL-MA volumes >5 mL. Patients responded well (68.4% and 66.7% for the MA and IL-MA groups, respectively). When a second cycle of treatment was necessary, the responses were 72.4% and 90%, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups. In the IL-MA group, 43% had mild to moderate adverse effects, without needing treatment discontinuation. Results suggest that the treatment of CL lesions with IL-MA is simple, efficient, and safe.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American tegumentary leishmaniasis; Cutaneous leishmaniasis; Intralesional; Meglumine antimoniate; Therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30851256     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  3 in total

1.  "Cheaper and better": Societal cost savings and budget impact of changing from systemic to intralesional pentavalent antimonials as the first-line treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Bolivia.

Authors:  Daniel Eid Rodríguez; Miguel San Sebastian; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-11-06

2.  Amentoflavone as an Ally in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Analysis of Its Antioxidant/Prooxidant Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yasmin Silva Rizk; Sandy Santos-Pereira; Luiza Gervazoni; Daiana de Jesus Hardoim; Flávia de Oliveira Cardoso; Celeste da Silva Freitas de Souza; Marcelo Pelajo-Machado; Carlos Alexandre Carollo; Carla Cardozo Pinto de Arruda; Elmo Eduardo Almeida-Amaral; Tânia Zaverucha-do-Valle; Kátia da Silva Calabrese
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.293

3.  An old drug and different ways to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis: Intralesional and intramuscular meglumine antimoniate in a reference center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Carla Oliveira-Ribeiro; Maria Inês Fernandes Pimentel; Liliane de Fátima Antonio Oliveira; Érica de Camargo Ferreira E Vasconcellos; Fatima Conceição-Silva; Armando de Oliveira Schubach; Aline Fagundes; Cintia Xavier de Mello; Eliame Mouta-Confort; Luciana de Freitas Campos Miranda; Claudia Maria Valete-Rosalino; Ana Cristina da Costa Martins; Raquel de Vasconcellos Carvalhaes de Oliveira; Leonardo Pereira Quintella; Marcelo Rosandiski Lyra
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.