Maria Kryza-Lacombe1, Melissa A Brotman2, Richard C Reynolds3, Kenneth Towbin2, Daniel S Pine2, Ellen Leibenluft2, Jillian Lee Wiggins1,4. 1. San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA. 2. Emotion Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about potential differences in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD) across development. The present study aimed to characterize age-related neural mechanisms of BD. METHODS: Youths and adults with and without BD (N = 108, age range = 9.8-55.9 years) completed an emotional face labeling task during fMRI acquisition. We leveraged three different fMRI analytic tools to identify age-related neural mechanisms of BD, investigating (a) change in neural responses over the course of the task, (b) neural activation averaged across the entire task, and (c) amygdala functional connectivity. RESULTS: We found converging Age Group × Diagnosis patterns across all three analytic methods. Compared to healthy youths vs adults, youths vs adults with BD show an altered pattern in response to repeated presentation of emotional faces in medial prefrontal, amygdala, and temporoparietal regions, as well as amygdala-temporoparietal connectivity. Specifically, medial prefrontal and lingual activation decreases over the course of repeated emotional face presentations in healthy youths vs adults but increases in youths with BD compared to adults with BD. Moreover, youths vs adults with BD show less medial prefrontal activation and amygdala-temporoparietal junction connectivity averaged over the task, but this difference is not found for healthy youths vs adults. CONCLUSION: Although longitudinal confirmation and replication will be necessary, these findings suggest that neural development may be aberrant in BD and that some neural mechanisms mediating BD may differ in adults vs children with the illness. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about potential differences in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD) across development. The present study aimed to characterize age-related neural mechanisms of BD. METHODS: Youths and adults with and without BD (N = 108, age range = 9.8-55.9 years) completed an emotional face labeling task during fMRI acquisition. We leveraged three different fMRI analytic tools to identify age-related neural mechanisms of BD, investigating (a) change in neural responses over the course of the task, (b) neural activation averaged across the entire task, and (c) amygdala functional connectivity. RESULTS: We found converging Age Group × Diagnosis patterns across all three analytic methods. Compared to healthy youths vs adults, youths vs adults with BD show an altered pattern in response to repeated presentation of emotional faces in medial prefrontal, amygdala, and temporoparietal regions, as well as amygdala-temporoparietal connectivity. Specifically, medial prefrontal and lingual activation decreases over the course of repeated emotional face presentations in healthy youths vs adults but increases in youths with BD compared to adults with BD. Moreover, youths vs adults with BD show less medial prefrontal activation and amygdala-temporoparietal junction connectivity averaged over the task, but this difference is not found for healthy youths vs adults. CONCLUSION: Although longitudinal confirmation and replication will be necessary, these findings suggest that neural development may be aberrant in BD and that some neural mechanisms mediating BD may differ in adults vs children with the illness. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
bipolar disorder; development; fMRI; face emotion; pediatric
Authors: Jillian Lee Wiggins; Nancy E Adleman; Pilyoung Kim; Allison H Oakes; Derek Hsu; Richard C Reynolds; Gang Chen; Daniel S Pine; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: J Kaufman; B Birmaher; D Brent; U Rao; C Flynn; P Moreci; D Williamson; N Ryan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Christian G Kohler; Lauren J Hoffman; Lucas B Eastman; Kristin Healey; Paul J Moberg Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Judah Weathers; Melissa A Brotman; Christen M Deveney; Pilyoung Kim; Carlos Zarate; Stephen Fromm; Daniel Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jennifer S Stevens; Ye Ji Kim; Isaac R Galatzer-Levy; Renuka Reddy; Timothy D Ely; Charles B Nemeroff; Lauren A Hudak; Tanja Jovanovic; Barbara O Rothbaum; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: M A Brotman; W-L Tseng; A K Olsavsky; S J Fromm; E J Muhrer; J G Rutenberg; C M Deveney; N E Adleman; C A Zarate; D S Pine; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Judah D Weathers; Argyris Stringaris; Christen M Deveney; Melissa A Brotman; Carlos A Zarate; Megan E Connolly; Stephen J Fromm; Stephanie B LeBourdais; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: V Dinkelacker; M Grüter; P Klaver; T Grüter; K Specht; S Weis; I Kennerknecht; C E Elger; G Fernandez Journal: J Neurol Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Diego Librenza-Garcia; Jee Su Suh; Devon Patrick Watts; Pedro Lemos Ballester; Luciano Minuzzi; Flavio Kapczinski; Benicio N Frey Journal: Curr Top Behav Neurosci Date: 2021
Authors: Donna J Roybal; Victoria E Cosgrove; Ryan Kelley; Rachel Smallwood Shoukry; Rose Marie Larios; Blake Novy; Kiki D Chang; Amy S Garrett Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 5.435