Literature DB >> 30850708

SPINK1 expression is enriched in African American prostate cancer but is not associated with altered immune infiltration or oncologic outcomes post-prostatectomy.

Farzana A Faisal1, Harsimar B Kaur2, Jeffrey J Tosoian3, Scott A Tomlins3,4, Edward M Schaeffer5, Tamara L Lotan6,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SPINK1 molecular subtype is more common in African-American (AA) men with prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) than European Americans (EA). Studies have suggested that SPINK1 expression is associated with more aggressive disease. However, the size, follow-up, and racial diversity of prior patient cohorts have limited our understanding of SPINK1 expression in AA men. The objective was to determine the associations between SPINK1 subtype, race, and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: A total of 186 AA and 206 EA men who underwent RP were matched according to pathologic grade. We examined SPINK1 status by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays using a genetically validated assay. Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed the association of SPINK1 status with oncologic outcomes in race-specific multivariate models. A second objective was to determine the correlation between CD3/CD8 T cell densities with SPINK1 status and race, using immunostaining and automated image analysis.
RESULTS: SPINK1-positive subtype was present in 25% (45/186) of AA and 15% (30/206) of EA men (p = 0.013). There were no differences in pathologic grade, pathologic stage, biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, or metastasis-free survival between SPINK1-positive and SPINK1-negative tumors in the overall cohort or by race. In multivariate analyses, SPINK1 expression was not associated with BCR (AA: HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.56-1.75, p = 0.976; EA: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.43-1.77, p = 0.720) or metastasis (AA: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.25-2.49, p = 0.691; EA: HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.58-4.11, p = 0.381) in either AA or EA men. There were no significant differences in surrounding CD3/CD8 lymphocyte densities between SPINK1-positive and SPINK1-negative tumors in either race.
CONCLUSIONS: SPINK1-positive subtype is more prevalent in AA than EA men with PCa. Contrary to previous studies, we found that SPINK1 protein expression was not associated with worse pathologic or oncologic outcomes after RP in either AA men or EA men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30850708     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  2 in total

1.  Therapeutic targeting of SPINK1-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bushra Ateeq; Scott A Tomlins; Bharathi Laxman; Irfan A Asangani; Qi Cao; Xuhong Cao; Yong Li; Xiaoju Wang; Felix Y Feng; Kenneth J Pienta; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  SPINK1 expression is tightly linked to 6q15- and 5q21-deleted ERG-fusion negative prostate cancers but unrelated to PSA recurrence.

Authors:  Katharina Grupp; Franz Diebel; Hüseyin Sirma; Ronald Simon; Karin Breitmeyer; Stefan Steurer; Claudia Hube-Magg; Kristina Prien; Taher Pham; Philipp Weigand; Uwe Michl; Hans Heinzer; Martina Kluth; Sarah Minner; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Jakob R Izbicki; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm; Waldemar Wilczak
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.104

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of 1152 African-American and European-American men with prostate cancer identifies distinct genomic and immunological differences.

Authors:  Walter Rayford; Alp Tuna Beksac; Jordan Alger; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mohsen Ahmed; Irtaza Khan; Ugo G Falagario; Yang Liu; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Edward M Schaeffer; Felix Y Feng; Brandon Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Robert B Den; Mark D Greenberger; Randy Bradley; Justin M Watson; Matthew Beamer; Lambros Stamatakis; Darrell J Carmen; Shivanshu Awasthi; Jonathan Hwang; Rachel Weil; Harri Merisaari; Nihal Mohamed; Leslie A Deane; Dimple Chakravarty; Kamlesh K Yadav; Kosj Yamoah; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 2.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Integrative comparison of the genomic and transcriptomic landscape between prostate cancer patients of predominantly African or European genetic ancestry.

Authors:  Jiao Yuan; Kevin H Kensler; Zhongyi Hu; Youyou Zhang; Tianli Zhang; Junjie Jiang; Mu Xu; Yutian Pan; Meixiao Long; Kathleen T Montone; Janos L Tanyi; Yi Fan; Rugang Zhang; Xiaowen Hu; Timothy R Rebbeck; Lin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 4.  Functional Roles of SPINK1 in Cancers.

Authors:  Tsung-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Why do African-American men face higher risks for lethal prostate cancer?

Authors:  Sujit S Nair; Dimple Chakravarty; Zachary S Dovey; Xiangfu Zhang; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Androgen deprivation upregulates SPINK1 expression and potentiates cellular plasticity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ritika Tiwari; Nishat Manzar; Vipul Bhatia; Anjali Yadav; Mushtaq A Nengroo; Dipak Datta; Shannon Carskadon; Nilesh Gupta; Michael Sigouros; Francesca Khani; Matti Poutanen; Amina Zoubeidi; Himisha Beltran; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Bushra Ateeq
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.