Literature DB >> 30850437

Therapeutic value of selective lymphadenectomy in interval debulking surgery for stage IIIc and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Nan Song1, Yunong Gao2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of selective lymphadenectomy at the time of interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to evaluate the value of selective lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery in patients with radiologic evidence of lymph node metastasis at initial diagnosis that ultimately become negative on imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis including patients with stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer and suspicious pelvic or para-aortic lymph node metastasis by imaging at diagnosis that resolved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was conducted from January 1996 to June 2016 with R0 interval debulking surgery. The patients with disease progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Suspicious metastatic lymph nodes at initial diagnosis by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were excised by selective lymphadenectomy. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression.
RESULTS: There were a total of 330 patients included in the analysis. Selective lymphadenectomy of suspicious nodes (Group 1) was performed in 145 patients. Systematic lymphadenectomy (Group 2) was performed in 118 patients. Sixty-seven patients did not undergo lymphadenectomy (Group 3). There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic features among the groups. Median progression-free survival was 28, 30.5, and 22 months in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (log-rank, p=0.049). No-lymphadenectomy was an independent factor affecting progression-free survival (Cox analysis, HR=1.729, 95% CI 1.213 to 2.464, p=0.002), with no difference between Groups 1 and 2 (Cox analysis, HR=1.097, 95% CI 0.815 to 1.478, p=0.541). Median overall survival was 50, 59, and 57 months in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Cox analysis, p=0.566). Patients who underwent selective lymphadenectomy had lower 1-year frequencies of lower extremity lymphedema and lymphocysts than those with systematic lymphadenectomy (6.2% vs 33.1%, p<0.001, and 6.2 % vs 27.1%, p<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Extent of lymphadenectomy (systematic or selective) had no significant impact on progression-free survival or overall survival. In addition, the risks of lower extremity lymphedema and lymphocysts were lower in patients who underwent selective lymphadenectomy. © IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced ovarian cancer; interval debulking surgery; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; selective lymphadenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30850437     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data.

Authors:  Stephanie Seidler; Meriem Koual; Guillaume Achen; Enrica Bentivegna; Laure Fournier; Nicolas Delanoy; Huyên-Thu Nguyen-Xuan; Anne-Sophie Bats; Henri Azaïs
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Systematic lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Caruso; Innocenza Palaia; Giorgio Bogani; Federica Tomao; Giorgia Perniola; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Ludovico Muzii; Violante Di Donato
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.756

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.