Literature DB >> 30850094

Is Routine Hardware Removal Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal Joint Fracture/Dislocation Necessary?

Michael D VanPelt1, Alexander Athey2, Jie Yao3, Kwame Ennin4, Layla Kassem5, Ed Mulligan6, Trapper Lalli7, George T Liu8.   

Abstract

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is an accepted treatment for displaced tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) fracture dislocations. In general, hardware is routinely removed after 4 months to allow restoration of joint motion and avoid complications of hardware failure. Because few studies report outcomes of TMTJ fractures with retained hardware, there is little consensus regarding the optimal time for hardware removal or if hardware retention leads to adverse outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographic outcomes of retained hardware after ORIF of TMTJ fractures/dislocations in 61 patients. The mean age at the time of operation was 37.3 ± 14.9 years. ORIF was performed with 3.5 fully threaded cortical screws. Assessment of clinical and radiographic results was performed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgical treatment. Out of the 61 patients that were included in this study, only 2 demographic variables demonstrated a trend for an adverse outcome. Older age correlated with lost reduction and elevated body mass index correlated with hardware failure. The presence of diabetes was correlated with an increased risk of postoperative infection but not hardware failure. During our follow-up period there were 49 patients (80.3 %) without failure of fixation. In conclusion, our study suggests that routine removal of hardware following open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc injuries in patients may not be necessary.
Copyright © 2018 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lisfranc fractures; hardware failure; hardware retention; open reduction internal fixation; tarsometatarsal joint

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30850094     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  3 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Outcomes Following Lisfranc Injury Fixation: Removal vs Retention of Metalwork.

Authors:  Amanda M L Rhodes; Louise McMenemy; Richard Connell; Robin Elliot; Daniel Marsland
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-10-10

2.  [Short-term effectiveness of Endobutton plate in reconstruction of Lisfranc ligament].

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yongfei Fan; Chaoyu Liu; Wenqiang Xu; Xiulin Ma; Jian Xu; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15

3.  Lisfranc fleck sign: characteristics and clinical outcomes following fixation using a percutaneous position Lisfranc screw.

Authors:  Moein Pourmorteza; Amir Reza Vosoughi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.693

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.