Rong-Wu Xiang1, Ruo-Bing Han2, Jing-Yu Yang3, Ming-Yi Zhao2, Qing-Chun Zhao4, Hui-Sheng Chen5, Fang-Qing Zhao2, Zhong-Yi Sun2, Tong Zhao2, Ting-Yan Song2. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. Electronic address: xrwlove@163.com. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. Electronic address: yangjingyu2006@gmail.com. 4. Department of Pharmacy, The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, 83 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. 5. Department of Internal Neurology, The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, 83 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapies for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a highly active research topic with five critical drugs obtained by visual analysis. We aimed to compare and rank multiple antiplatelet therapies using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant medical databases were searched. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined any comparisons involving mono- or dual antiplatelet therapies, based on aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, cilostazol and placebo for patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA, were included. 14 outcomes were assessed. Primary outcomes were stroke recurrence, composite events (stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction and vascular death), and intracranial hemorrhage. PROSPERO registered number CRD42017069728. RESULTS: 45 RCTs with 173,131 patients were included in network meta-analysis, involving eight antiplatelet therapies. Cilostazol and clopidogrel were statistically more efficacious than aspirin (odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.47-0.88; OR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.62-0.95) and dipyridamole (OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.44-0.93; OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.58-0.99) in reducing stroke recurrence, and showed significant benefits in reducing composite events compared with aspirin (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.45-0.89; OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.83-0.97). No significant difference was found between cilostazol and clopidogrel in intracranial hemorrhage. Weighted regression suggested cilostazol was hierarchically the optimum treatment in consideration of both efficacy and safety, followed by clopidogrel. CONCLUSION: Cilostazol and clopidogrel are probably promising options for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or TIA. Both of them reduce stroke recurrence similarly compared with aspirin or dipyridamole, and reduce composite events compared with aspirin. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapies for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a highly active research topic with five critical drugs obtained by visual analysis. We aimed to compare and rank multiple antiplatelet therapies using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant medical databases were searched. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined any comparisons involving mono- or dual antiplatelet therapies, based on aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, cilostazol and placebo for patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA, were included. 14 outcomes were assessed. Primary outcomes were stroke recurrence, composite events (stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction and vascular death), and intracranial hemorrhage. PROSPERO registered number CRD42017069728. RESULTS: 45 RCTs with 173,131 patients were included in network meta-analysis, involving eight antiplatelet therapies. Cilostazol and clopidogrel were statistically more efficacious than aspirin (odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.47-0.88; OR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.62-0.95) and dipyridamole (OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.44-0.93; OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.58-0.99) in reducing stroke recurrence, and showed significant benefits in reducing composite events compared with aspirin (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.45-0.89; OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.83-0.97). No significant difference was found between cilostazol and clopidogrel in intracranial hemorrhage. Weighted regression suggested cilostazol was hierarchically the optimum treatment in consideration of both efficacy and safety, followed by clopidogrel. CONCLUSION:Cilostazol and clopidogrel are probably promising options for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or TIA. Both of them reduce stroke recurrence similarly compared with aspirin or dipyridamole, and reduce composite events compared with aspirin. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Authors: Dániel Tornyos; András Komócsi; Alexandra Bálint; Péter Kupó; Oumaima El Alaoui El Abdallaoui; László Szapáry; László Botond Szapáry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.752