BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) has been shown to predict relapse in inflammatory bowel disease, but its value in the detection of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease (CD) is unknown. The aims of this pilot study performed in patients with CD after ileocolonic resection were to compare the macroscopic appearance of the neoterminal ileum, according to the endoscopic Rutgeerts score, with the microscopic findings provided by CLE 6 to 12 months after surgery and to assess the predictive values of CLE-generated parameters for predicting further recurrence in patients with postoperative endoscopic remission. METHODS: In 25 consecutive patients with CD within 6 to 12 months of surgery, the neoterminal ileum was examined by standard white-light endoscopy (Rutgeerts scale) followed by CLE (Watson grade). Only patients without endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts i0 and i1) were then followed endoscopically and clinically (median follow-up 38 months). RESULTS: At the time of the first postoperative colonoscopy, 18 patients (72%) were in endoscopic remission, and 7 (28%) experienced an endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts ≥i2). The Rutgeerts score was significantly correlated with the Watson score (ρ = 0 .73; P < .0001). The Watson scores at baseline were significantly higher in patients with further endoscopic recurrence (median 2.0; interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-2.0) than in those with endoscopic remission (median 1.0; IQR 1.0-1.0; P = .032) and were significantly higher in patients with clinical relapse (medium 2.0, IQR 2.0-2.0) compared with those in clinical remission (median 1.0; IQR 1.0-1.0; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: CLE could be useful in monitoring patients with CD after intestinal resection. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) has been shown to predict relapse in inflammatory bowel disease, but its value in the detection of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease (CD) is unknown. The aims of this pilot study performed in patients with CD after ileocolonic resection were to compare the macroscopic appearance of the neoterminal ileum, according to the endoscopic Rutgeerts score, with the microscopic findings provided by CLE 6 to 12 months after surgery and to assess the predictive values of CLE-generated parameters for predicting further recurrence in patients with postoperative endoscopic remission. METHODS: In 25 consecutive patients with CD within 6 to 12 months of surgery, the neoterminal ileum was examined by standard white-light endoscopy (Rutgeerts scale) followed by CLE (Watson grade). Only patients without endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts i0 and i1) were then followed endoscopically and clinically (median follow-up 38 months). RESULTS: At the time of the first postoperative colonoscopy, 18 patients (72%) were in endoscopic remission, and 7 (28%) experienced an endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts ≥i2). The Rutgeerts score was significantly correlated with the Watson score (ρ = 0 .73; P < .0001). The Watson scores at baseline were significantly higher in patients with further endoscopic recurrence (median 2.0; interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-2.0) than in those with endoscopic remission (median 1.0; IQR 1.0-1.0; P = .032) and were significantly higher in patients with clinical relapse (medium 2.0, IQR 2.0-2.0) compared with those in clinical remission (median 1.0; IQR 1.0-1.0; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: CLE could be useful in monitoring patients with CD after intestinal resection. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.