Literature DB >> 30849343

Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis Surgery Using the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the First Year.

Philip Enders1, Jonathan Hall2, Marco Bornhauser2, Kaweh Mansouri3, Lebriz Altay4, Stefan Schrader5, Thomas S Dietlein4, Bjoern O Bachmann4, Thomas Neuhann2, Claus Cursiefen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the dynamics of telemetrically measured intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first year after implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type I (BI-KPro) cornea and to compare agreement of telemetric IOP measurements with finger palpations.
DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial.
METHODS: In the ARGOS (NCT02945176) study, 12 individuals underwent implantation of an Eyemate-IO intraocular system. Follow-up after surgery took place 12 months later with 13 visits planned per patient. During BI-KPro surgery, an electromagnetic induction sensor ring enabling telemetric IOP data transfer to a hand-held reading device outside the eye was implanted into the ciliary sulcus with or without trans-scleral suture fixation. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and IOP assessments through the telemetric system were compared to IOP assessed by finger palpation by 2 experts.
RESULTS: Preoperative IOP measured by Goldmann tonometry was 13.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg. Telemetric IOP peaked at 23.1 ± 16.5 mm Hg at the first postoperative day. On day 5, mean IOP was 16.0 ± 5.2 mm Hg and 20.95 ± 6.5 mm Hg after 6-12 months. IOP estimation by finger palpation was grouped in 4 categories: normal, A; soft/hypotonic, B; borderline, C; and hypertonic, D. Mean telemetric IOP was 18.2 ± 6.1 mm Hg in category A, 8.9 ± 2.8 mm Hg in B, 22.4 ± 4.9 mm Hg in C, and 34.3 ± 11.0 mm Hg in D. Differences in mean telemetric IOPs per category were statistically significant (P < .001). Daily IOP fluctuations and peaks could be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Telemetric IOP assessment seems to be able to identify postoperative IOP peaks and a longitudinal increase of IOP after BI-KPro surgery. IOP measurements using the telemetric Eyemate-IO sensor showed a satisfactory agreement with those of finger palpations by 2 experts.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30849343     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of vascularized high-risk eyes with a Boston keratoprosthesis].

Authors:  F Schaub; M Matthaei; P Enders; S Siebelmann; D Hos; B O Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Challenges of Glaucoma Management in Patients with Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Sara M AlHilali; Samar A Al-Swailem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Real-Time Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Patients Using Wearable Mobile Medicine Devices.

Authors:  Xiangwen Yuan; Jiabin Zhang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Influence of electromagnetic radiation emitted by daily-use electronic devices on the Eyemate® system in-vitro: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Azzurra Invernizzi; Shereif Haykal; Valeria Lo Faro; Vincenzo Pennisi; Lars Choritz
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.