Literature DB >> 30849028

Resolving Age-Related Differences in Working Memory: Equating Perception and Attention Makes Older Adults Remember as Well as Younger Adults.

Paul Verhaeghen1, Shriradha Geigerman1, Haoxiang Yang2, Alejandra C Montoya1, Dobromir Rahnev1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Older adults show clear deficits in working memory functioning. Here, we investigate the often-reported decline in focus switching, that is, the ability to shift items from the focus of attention into working memory, and back. Specifically, we examined whether equating subjects on early processing (perception and attention) might ameliorate the deficit.
METHOD: We examined 1-Back and 2-Back performance in younger and older adults, with line segments of different orientation as the stimuli. Stimuli were calibrated depending on each individual's 75% threshold for 1-Back performance. Subjects made match/mismatch judgments.
RESULTS: After the calibration on 1-Back performance, no age-related differences were found on either accuracy or sensitivity in the 2-Back task. Additionally, when investigating focus-switch trials versus non-focus-switch trials in a random-order 2-Back task, older adults were more efficient at switching the focus of attention than younger adults. DISCUSSION: These results provide evidence for the view that age-related limitations in focus switching in working memory are caused (at least in part) by changes in early processing (perception and attention), suggesting that (at least some of the) age-related differences in working memory functioning may be due to shifts in trade-off between early processing and memory-related processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30849028      PMCID: PMC6689224          DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  36 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Structural constraints on process explanations in cognitive aging.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; S J Czaja
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-03

3.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions.

Authors:  Karen Z H Li; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  A STUDY OF AUDITORY SENSITIVITY IN ADVANCED AGE.

Authors:  K W SCHAIE; P BALTES; C R STROTHER
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1964-10

6.  A working memory workout: how to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items in 10 hours or less.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella; Chandramallika Basak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kara L Bopp; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: results from a modified N-back task.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; Chandramallika Basak
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-01

9.  Aging, focus switching, and task switching in a continuous calculation task: evidence toward a new working memory control process.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; William J Hoyer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2007-01

Review 10.  Top-down modulation and normal aging.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  2 in total

1.  Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.139

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.