Literature DB >> 30848708

Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes from the Past two Decades.

Laszlo Göbölös1, Jehad Ramahi1, Andres Obeso1, Thomas Bartel2, Maurice Hogan3, Mahmoud Traina2, Ahmad Edris2, Faisal Hasan2, Mosaad El Banna2, Emin Murat Tuzcu2, Johannes Bonatti1.   

Abstract

Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) was introduced in 1998 and has over a period of two decades gradually emerged from single-vessel revascularization to multivessel bypass grafting. Dedicated centers have continuously evolved and further developed this minimally invasive method of coronary bypass surgery. A literature review was conducted to assess intra- and postoperative outcomes of TECAB. PubMed returned 19 comprehensive articles on TECAB. Investigation was focused on perioperative outcome parameters, i.e.: operative time, conversion to larger incision, revision for bleeding, atrial fibrillation, stroke, acute renal failure, and mortality. Outcome from the analysis of 2,397 reported cases showed an average operative time of 291 ± 57 minutes (range 112 to 1,050), conversion rate to larger incisions at 11.5%, and perioperative mortality at 0.8%. Pooled data demonstrated 4.2% operative revision rate due to postoperative hemorrhage, 1.0% stroke incidence, 1.6% acute renal failure, and 13.3% de novo atrial fibrillation. The mean length of hospital stay measured 5.8 ± 1.7 days. Conversion rates and operative times decreased over time. According to data in the literature, coronary bypass surgery carried out in completely endoscopic fashion utilizing robotic assistance can require relatively extensive operative times and conversion rates are somewhat higher than in other robotic cardiac surgery. However, major postoperative events lie in an acceptable range. TECAB remains the surgical revascularization method with the least tissue trauma and represents an opportunity for coronary artery bypass grafting via port access. Rates of major complications are at least similar to conventional surgical access procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrested heart; beating heart; coronary bypass; outcomes; robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30848708     DOI: 10.1177/1556984519827703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  6 in total

1.  The learning curve of robotic coronary arterial bypass surgery: A report from the STS database.

Authors:  William L Patrick; Amit Iyengar; Jason J Han; Jarvis C Mays; Mark Helmers; John J Kelly; Xingmei Wang; Mehrdad Ghoreishi; Bradley S Taylor; Pavan Atluri; Nimesh D Desai; Matthew L Williams
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  Review of Contemporary Techniques for Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Ali Fatehi Hassanabad; Jimmy Kang; Andrew Maitland; Corey Adams; William D T Kent
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 3.  Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review.

Authors:  Johannes Bonatti; Stephanie Wallner; Ingo Crailsheim; Martin Grabenwöger; Bernhard Winkler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Commentary: Beyond the horizon of evidence in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Aaron J Weiss; William C Frankel; Faisal G Bakaeen
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: It's now or never!

Authors:  Husam H Balkhy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-04-10

6.  Commentary: Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: State of an art.

Authors:  Saqib H Qureshi; Marc Ruel
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-05-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.