PURPOSE: The uterine immunophenotype is relatively poorly understood, with most studies reporting proportions/percentages. A novel technique to calculate local endometrial lymphocyte concentrations is described, and used to compare results between aetiological subgroups such as repeated implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with male-factor controls. METHODS: 455 patients had an endometrial biopsy performed. Background history on initial presentation was used to subdivide the population into RIF (n = 149), RPL (n = 121), primary (n = 76) and secondary infertility (n = 80). A control group was identified comprising male factor infertility aetiology with all female investigations normal (n = 29). Endometrial Tissue was assessed using a comprehensive multi-parameter panel. Lymphocyte subpopulations were calculated using flowcount flurospheres and a mathematical correction applied to determine concentrations per milligram of tissue, based on original biopsy weight and volumetric dilutions. RESULTS: The flow cytometry technique was successful in determining population centiles for concentrations of endometrial lymphocyte subsets. Distinct differences were noted across the patient groups. Th2 concentrations were significantly higher in the controls (p = 0.0002). All RPL/infertile populations had increased concentrations of peripheral type NK's (p = 0.016) and B cells (p = 0.045). Relative to male factor controls, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte populations were increased in RPL patients, and reduced in those with a history of RIF. Th1 concentrations were elevated in the adverse outcome groups (p = 0.032). Concentration centiles alone do not appear to accurately predict outcome with subsequent treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial biopsy analysis by flow cytometry can provide detailed analysis of constituent lymphocyte subsets by concentration as well as proportion. This novel approach provides additional independent data to further assess the significance of endometrial changes in the setting of reproductive failure.
PURPOSE: The uterine immunophenotype is relatively poorly understood, with most studies reporting proportions/percentages. A novel technique to calculate local endometrial lymphocyte concentrations is described, and used to compare results between aetiological subgroups such as repeated implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with male-factor controls. METHODS: 455 patients had an endometrial biopsy performed. Background history on initial presentation was used to subdivide the population into RIF (n = 149), RPL (n = 121), primary (n = 76) and secondary infertility (n = 80). A control group was identified comprising male factor infertility aetiology with all female investigations normal (n = 29). Endometrial Tissue was assessed using a comprehensive multi-parameter panel. Lymphocyte subpopulations were calculated using flowcount flurospheres and a mathematical correction applied to determine concentrations per milligram of tissue, based on original biopsy weight and volumetric dilutions. RESULTS: The flow cytometry technique was successful in determining population centiles for concentrations of endometrial lymphocyte subsets. Distinct differences were noted across the patient groups. Th2 concentrations were significantly higher in the controls (p = 0.0002). All RPL/infertile populations had increased concentrations of peripheral type NK's (p = 0.016) and B cells (p = 0.045). Relative to male factor controls, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte populations were increased in RPLpatients, and reduced in those with a history of RIF. Th1 concentrations were elevated in the adverse outcome groups (p = 0.032). Concentration centiles alone do not appear to accurately predict outcome with subsequent treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial biopsy analysis by flow cytometry can provide detailed analysis of constituent lymphocyte subsets by concentration as well as proportion. This novel approach provides additional independent data to further assess the significance of endometrial changes in the setting of reproductive failure.
Authors: Louise A Koopman; Hernan D Kopcow; Basya Rybalov; Jonathan E Boyson; Jordan S Orange; Frederick Schatz; Rachel Masch; Charles J Lockwood; Asher D Schachter; Peter J Park; Jack L Strominger Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2003-10-20 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Ee Von Woon; Orene Greer; Nishel Shah; Dimitrios Nikolaou; Mark Johnson; Victoria Male Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 17.179
Authors: Ruth Marian Guzman-Genuino; Preethi Eldi; Pablo Garcia-Valtanen; John D Hayball; Kerrilyn R Diener Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 7.561