| Literature DB >> 30847616 |
Prathibha M Dharmappa1, Pushpa Doddaraju1, Mohankumar V Malagondanahalli1, Raju B Rangappa1,2, N M Mallikarjuna1, Sowmya H Rajendrareddy1, Ramachandra Ramanjinappa1,3, Rajanna P Mavinahalli4, Trichy Ganesh Prasad1, Makarla Udayakumar1, Sreeman M Sheshshayee5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Semi-irrigated aerobic cultivation of rice has been suggested as a potential water saving agronomy. However, suitable cultivars are needed in order to sustain yield levels. An introgression of water mining and water use efficiency (WUE) traits is the most appropriate strategy for a comprehensive genetic enhancement to develop such rice cultivars.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic Rice; Carbon isotope discrimination; Grain yield; Marker assisted backcross breeding; Phenotyping; Quantitative trait loci; Roots; Trait introgressed lines; Water-use efficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 30847616 PMCID: PMC6405788 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-019-0268-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
List of markers associated with specific target trait used for Foreground selection
| Trait associated | Trait component | Marker | Chr. no | Position on chromosome (cM) | R2 | IR-64 | AC-39020 | IET-16348 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | RLD | RM80 | 8 | 103.7 | 19.0 | 132 | 143 | 122 |
| RWT | RM2584 | 8 | 45.8 | 14.5 | 173 | 176 | 247 | |
| RLD | RM1388 | 4 | 77.9 | 17.2 | 245 | 235 | 215 | |
| RLD | RM262 | 2 | 81.1 | 14.5 | 185 | 178 | 170 | |
| R/S | RM239 | 10 | 25.2 | 13.8 | 194 | 198 | 219 | |
| RV | RM3825 | 1 | 143.7 | 13.0 | 163 | 169 | 154 | |
| RV | RM16 | 3 | 131.5 | 10.8 | 186 | 187 | 167 | |
| RL | RM3276 | 4 | 102.4 | 13.3 | 158 | 190 | 169 | |
| RV | RM247 | 12 | 32.3 | 12.1 | 145 | 139 | 166 | |
| RLD | RM167 | 4 | 37.5 | 16.7 | 167 | 129 | 146 | |
| RV | RM4455 | 10 | 21.8 | 20.4 | 221 | 298 | 149 | |
| R/S | RM71 | 2 | 49.8 | 10.1 | 160 | 143 | 168 | |
| Δ13C | Δ13C | RM493 | 1 | 79.9 | 14.2 | 260 | 250 | 240 |
| Δ13C | RM586 | 6 | 7.4 | 17.4 | 243 | 272 | 278 | |
| Δ13C | RM149 | 8 | 122.1 | 15.4 | 255 | 264 | 357 | |
| Δ13C | RM131 | 4 | 148.8 | 18.3 | 217 | 207 | 223 |
Note: These markers were discovered by adopting association mapping approach and are reported in Raju et al. (2016). The position of the marker on rice genome was obtained from http://archive.gramene.org/markers/
RLD Root length density (cm2 g− 1), RWT Root weight (g pl− 1), R/S Root to shoot biomass ratio (g. g− 1), RV Root volume (cm3), ΔC Carbon isotope discrimination (‰)
Fig. 1The scheme of Multi-parent Marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) to introgress root and WUE traits into IR-64 background. Foot note: Based on phenotypic and molecular diversity AC-39020 and IET-16348 were selected as donor parents for root WUE associated traits. IR-64 was selected as recipient parent because of its drought susceptibility. The donor parents were hybridised with recipient parents separately, to obtain the F1s. The resultant F1s were hybridised to get DCF1s. From this stage, plants were selected and backcrossed with IR-64 till BC3F1 stage. Further, selfing was done to identify the trait introgressed lines
Phenotypic variations and marker polymorphism of the trait donor genotypes in comparison with IR-64
| Parent | RL (cm) | RW (g pl−1) | RV (cm3) | Δ13C (‰) | TLA (cm2 pl−1) | TDM (g pl− 1) | DM/LA (g m2) | GL/GW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR-64 | 25.5 | 2.5 | 25.1 | 21.5 | 3543 | 65.61 | 120.76 | 2.11 |
| AC-39020 | 65.4 | 10.4 | 70.3 | 19.5 | 4563 | 120.75 | 188.45 | 1.42 |
| IET-16348 | 35.5 | 5.1 | 50.4 | 18.4 | 3278 | 150.58 | 150.28 | 1.81 |
Note: RL Root length, RW Root weight, RV Root volume, ΔC Carbon isotope discrimination, TLA Total leaf area, TDM Total dry matter, DM/LA Dry matter per unit leaf area, GL/GW Grain length to width ratio
Morpho-physiological and molecular variations of IR-64 and the backcross progenies at different generations (A) mean and range for the phenotypic value of target traits (B) improvement in traits over IR-64 at each generations, number of markers introgressed and background genome recovery in advanced backcross stages
| (A) | |||||||||||
| Generation | Season | # of plants | Δ13C (‰) | LT (° C) | |||||||
| IR-64 | Mean ± SD | Range | IR-64 | Mean ± SD | Range | ||||||
| BC1F1 a | June–December,2012 | 42 | 21.5 | 21.23 ± 0.95 | 17.5–25.5 | 35.6 | 32.3 ± 2.04 | 32.4–36.4 | |||
| BC2F1 | June–December,2014 | 100 | 21.88 | 19.7 ± 0.87 | 18–25.3 | 37.2 | 35.0 ± 1.87 | 31.4–36.52 | |||
| BC3F1 | January–May, 2015 | 120 | 22.65 | 18.84 ± 0.93 | 15.09–20.62 | 36.3 | 34.34 ± 1.73 | 30.2–36.5 | |||
| (B) | |||||||||||
| Generation | Plants selected | # of markers in heterozygote condition | Genome recovery (%) | Phenotype | % change over IR-64 | Significance | |||||
| Roots (12) | Δ13C (4) | Expected | Estimated | Δ13C | LT | Δ13C (−ve) | LT (−ve) | Δ13C | LT | ||
| BC1F1 | 32 | 12 | 4 | 75.0 | 72.5 | 19.5 | 32.1 | 9.30 | 9.83 | ** | * |
| 73 | 11 | 3 | 75.0 | 69.7 | 19.1 | 33.5 | 11.16 | 5.90 | |||
| 81 | 12 | 4 | 75.0 | 70.4 | 19.8 | 32.5 | 7.91 | 8.71 | |||
| 91 | 11 | 2 | 75.0 | 73.2 | 19.4 | 34.1 | 9.77 | 4.21 | |||
| BC2F1 | 32–1 | 12 | 4 | 87.5 | 83.2 | 18.28 | 31.6 | 16.45 | 15.05 | ** | ** |
| 73–3 | 10 | 3 | 87.5 | 82.8 | 18.65 | 33.2 | 14.76 | 10.75 | |||
| 81–23 | 12 | 4 | 87.5 | 82.1 | 18.42 | 31.4 | 15.81 | 15.59 | |||
| BC3F1 | 32–1-34 | 11 | 3 | 93.75 | 90.5 | 19.96 | 32.1 | 11.88 | 11.57 | ** | ** |
| 32–1-40 | 10 | 4 | 93.75 | 90.5 | 18.35 | 31.5 | 18.98 | 13.22 | |||
| 81–23-27 | 10 | 3 | 93.75 | 91.5 | 17.82 | 32.7 | 21.32 | 9.92 | |||
| 81–23-31 | 10 | 4 | 93.75 | 92.5 | 18.85 | 31.1 | 16.78 | 14.33 | |||
ΔC Carbon isotope discrimination (‰), LT Leaf temperature (°C)
a Since this was an early generation only 42 BC1F1 plants were phenotyped out of the total 120 BC1F1 plants generated
* and ** denote significance at 5% and 1%, respectively
Performance of parents and the segregating BC3F2 (n = 1440) progenies for various morpho-physiological traits under semi-irrigated aerobic condition
| Parents/Progenies | SLA | GY | TDM | DM/LA |
| IR-64 | 210.8 ± 16.5 | 20.3 ± 3.2 | 70 ± 6.3 | 116.4 |
| AC-39020 | 196.28 ± 21.2 | 16.5 ± 5.4 | 103 ± 8.5 | 183.3 |
| IET-16348 | 180.9 ± 14.3 | 14.6 ± 3.5 | 81.5 ± 5.4 | 160.5 |
| Mean of1440 BC3F2 plants | 170.46 | 35.50 | 74.97 | 145.3 |
| Range | (111–287) | (4–55.5) | (12–147) | (100–189) |
| Selected 260 plants | 204.5 | 44.06 | 103.5 | 154.6 |
| CD | 81.3 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| CV | 12.4 | 8.6 | 12.3 | 13.4 |
Note: SLA Specific leaf area (cm2 g−1), GY Grain yield (g pl−1), TDM Total dry matter (g pl−1), DM/LA Dry matter per unit leaf area (g m−2)
Variability in root traits and other biometric parameters among parents and BC3F3 progenies
| Parents/Progenies | PH | RL | RW | SLA | TLA | Δ13C | TDM | DM/LA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR-64 | 80 | 26 | 3.20 | 208 | 3467 | 22.42 | 45.40 | 152.3 |
| AC-39020 | 105 | 41 | 7.40 | 216 | 4732 | 22.31 | 71.10 | 198.4 |
| IET-16348 | 94 | 33 | 3.40 | 188 | 3533 | 19.43 | 56.20 | 165.3 |
| 260 lines | 83 | 34 | 4.90 | 202 | 3234 | 19.57 | 59.60 | 176.4 |
| Minimum | 65 | 20 | 1.54 | 182 | 2342 | 16.31 | 40.00 | 80 |
| Maximum | 85 | 70 | 12.2 | 232 | 5343 | 21.56 | 120.00 | 220 |
| CD | 4.6 | 5.8 | 1.90 | 52.16 | 987 | 1.15 | 13.13 | 8.56 |
| CV | 5.4 | 12.3 | 8.60 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 5.40 | 7.60 | 16.6 |
Note: PH Plant height (cm), RL Root length (cm), RW Root weight (g pl−1), TLA Total leaf area (cm2 pl−1), SLA Specific leaf area (cm2 g−1), ΔC Carbon isotope discrimination (‰), TDM Total dry matter (g pl− 1), DM/LA Dry matter per unit leaf area (g m−2)
Fig. 2Improvement in root traits of TILs as compared to parents. a -TIL-32-1-40-84-54, b -32-1-40-24-57, c -32-1-40-78-84, d -81-23-27-378-93, e -81-23-31-75-157, f -81-23-31-75-187 Foot note: Plants were raised in root structure and the roots were harvested at 75DAS. The panel a to f represent the improved root traits in TILs
Variability in yield and yield-related traits among parents and BC3F3 progenies for under semi-irrigated aerobic condition
| Parents/Progenies | DFF | PN | # of S/P | TW | PL | SF | GY | GL | GW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR-64 | 84 | 22 | 123 | 24 | 18 | 54 | 23 | 9.10 | 2.10 |
| AC-39020 | 103 | 11 | 82 | 34 | 17 | 83 | 23 | 6.00 | 3.00 |
| IET-16348 | 95 | 21 | 159 | 27 | 17 | 72 | 26 | 7.60 | 2.20 |
| 260 lines | 84 | 23 | 117 | 27 | 18 | 80 | 32 | 8.88 | 2.06 |
| Minimum | 76 | 18 | 97 | 21 | 10 | 65 | 8 | 7.60 | 1.28 |
| Maximum | 95 | 28 | 143 | 29 | 21 | 95 | 50 | 9.77 | 2.41 |
| CD | 6.4 | 4.2 | 7.6 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 12.4 | 6.12 | 0.522 | 0.32 |
| CV | 3.6 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 4.3 |
Note: DFF Days to 50% flowering (days), PN Panicle number (#), # of S/P Number of spikelets per panicle (#), TW Test weight (g), PL Panicle length (cm), SF Spikelet fertility (%), GY Grain yield (g pl−1), GL Grain length (mm), GW Grain width (mm)
Fig. 3Comparison of selected trait introgressed lines with IR-64 for RWC, Δ13C, TLA, spikelet fertility and grain yield under managed drought environment. *, ** indicates a significant difference at P =0.05, 0.01. Note: Selected five TILs along with the IR-64 were grown under well watered (100% FC) and water limited (60% FC) conditions under MDE. Various physiological parameters were measured at vegetative and reproductive stage and compared with IR-64
Fig. 4Graphical genotyping plot and the grain characters (inset) for a selected TIL namely 32–1–40-78-84. Note: Red colour indicates homozygous region similar to IR-64 genome, Yellow colour indicate introgression of AC-39020 genome governing root QTLs and Blue colour indicates introgression of IET-16348 genome for WUE traits