Literature DB >> 30847178

Short term outcomes of helical tomotherapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Yasushi Mabuchi1, Yoshihiro Takiguchi1, Tamaki Yahata1, Mika Mizoguchi1, Noriyuki Sasaki1, Nami Ota1, Sawako Minami1, Kazuhiko Ino1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to clarify the feasibility and efficacy of helical tomotherapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treating cervical cancer. The medical records of 13 patients who underwent oncurrent chemoradiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for cervical cancer at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 15 patients who underwent oncurrent chemoradiotherapy using conventional radiotherapy (CRT) between 2008 and 2013 at our institution were also examined for comparison. The median age of patients treated with helical tomotherapy was 60 (range, 35-71), and the median age of patients treated with CRT was 57 (range, 43-77). The median follow-up period was 27 months (range, 3-46) in the tomotherapy group and 35 months (range, 7-88) in the CRT group. The frequency of G3/4 thrombocytopenia in the tomotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the CRT group (P=0.049). However, the platelet count spontaneously recovered without transfusion. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of frequency of G3/4 neutropenia, diarrhea or late intestine injury. The rate of complete response in the tomotherapy group and the CRT group was 84.6 and 73.3%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the response rate between the groups. There were no significant differences in the progression-free survival or progression-free rate in the irradiation field between the groups. Adverse events from concurrent chemoradiotherapy using helical tomotherapy were acceptable and clinically controllable. The present results suggest that helical tomotherapy is efficient during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; helical tomotherapy; outcome; radiation therapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30847178      PMCID: PMC6388508          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  9 in total

1.  Helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients: an intraindividual comparison.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Dusko Lukarski; Christhardt Köhler; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Andreas Ebert; Volker Budach; Achim Schneider; Carmen Stromberger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  C J Tseng; C T Chang; C H Lai; Y K Soong; J H Hong; S G Tang; S Hsueh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Toxicity and early clinical outcomes in cervical cancer following extended field helical tomotherapy to para-aortic lymph nodes.

Authors:  E Jouglar; L Thomas; A de la Rochefordière; G Noël; M Le Blanc-Onfroy; G Delpon; L Campion; M-A Mahé
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.018

4.  Early clinical outcomes and toxicity of intensity modulated versus conventional pelvic radiation therapy for locally advanced cervix carcinoma: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ajeet Kumar Gandhi; Daya Nand Sharma; Goura Kisor Rath; Pramod Kumar Julka; Vellaiyan Subramani; Seema Sharma; Durai Manigandan; M A Laviraj; Sunesh Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Split-field helical tomotherapy with or without chemotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Susan Richardson; Perry W Grigsby; Julie K Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prospective phase I-II trial of helical tomotherapy with or without chemotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Julie K Schwarz; Sasa Wahab; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  A systematic review of acute and late toxicity of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  John M Kirwan; Paul Symonds; John A Green; Jayne Tierney; Mandy Collingwood; Christopher J Williams
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  H M Keys; B N Bundy; F B Stehman; L I Muderspach; W E Chafe; C L Suggs; J L Walker; D Gersell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The safety and efficacy of a novel hypo-fractionated total marrow and lymphoid irradiation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Liu Shi; Xuan Lu; Di Deng; Lijing Yang; Hongli Zhao; Jiuling Shen; Xiaoyong Wang; Conghua Xie; An Liu; Yang Cao; Yu Xiong
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-12

2.  Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Haijiao Shang; Yuehu Pu; Wei Wang; Zhitao Dai; Fu Jin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.