| Literature DB >> 30847151 |
Cristina Proserpio1, Vera Lavelli1, Monica Laureati1, Ella Pagliarini1.
Abstract
Pleurotus ostreatus is an edible mushroom with interesting nutritional properties, which is able to grow on agri-food waste and could in turn be used as an ingredient for food fortification. However, new food products have to face with the growing consumer consciousness about what they eat and hedonic responses, which represent a key factor in determining food preference and choices. The aim of this study was to design a vegetable-based product (a pumpkin and carrot soup) added with increasing concentration of P. ostreatus powder rich in β-glucans, which are fibers with demonstrated bioactivity in humans, and to obtain a sensory description of these fortified products to find the desirable and undesirable sensory properties that affect their acceptance. A total of 109 subjects (women N = 52; men N = 57; age = 36.1 ± 14.4 years) evaluated five samples of pumpkin and carrot soup added with increasing concentrations of mushroom powder (0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and a hidden control at 0%) for liking and sensory properties by means of the check-all-that-apply method. Results showed that creaminess, orange color, mild odor, and taste were positively related to vegetable soups liking, whereas strong taste, dark color, and mushroom odor described the less liked samples. Sample added with 2% of mushroom powder obtained comparable liking scores to the unmodified sample, while liking decreased with increasing concentration of P. ostreatus powder. The present results demonstrated that it is possible to fortify a vegetable soup with P. ostreatus powder developing well-accepted foods by consumers. This product could be used to implement an everyday dietary intervention of β-glucans over a long-term period.Entities:
Keywords: check‐all‐that‐apply; fiber; liking; mushroom; sensory perception
Year: 2019 PMID: 30847151 PMCID: PMC6392850 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Content in total glucans (mean ± SD, g/100 g d.w.) and β‐glucans (mean ± SD g/100 g d.w.) in P. ostreatus
| Samples | Total glucan | β‐glucan |
|---|---|---|
| PO1 KCS0152 | 25.4 | 24.9 |
| PO2 KCS0160 | 37.1 | 35.0 |
| PO3 KCS0160 | 39.1 | 36.9 |
| PO4 KCS0160 | 36.0 | 35.0 |
a,bDifferent letters in the same column represent significant differences (LSD, p < 0.05).
Functional foods enriched with mushroom β‐glucans
| Food | Ingredient and addition level (%) | β‐glucan per serving (g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rice noodles |
| 1.1–3.4 (100) | Heo et al. ( |
| Baked cake |
| 1–3 (100) | Kim et al. ( |
| Pasta |
| 0.79–4.8 (100) | Kim et al. ( |
| Biscuits |
| 0.32‐0.53 (30) | Ng et al. ( |
| Vegetable soup |
| 2.2–6.6 (300) | This study |
Values in brackets indicate the portion size.
Figure 1Mean liking scores ± SEM by samples. Different letters indicate significant differences according to post hoc test
Frequency mention of sensory attributes associated with each samples
| Sensory modality | Sensory attributes | Frequency of mentions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | |||||
| C0 | C2 | C4 | C6 | ||
| Appearance | Orange color | 97 | 51 | 23 | 8 |
| Homogeneous | 80 | 39 | 23 | 10 | |
| Irregular | 4 | 44 | 51 | 68 | |
| Dark color | 7 | 42 | 65 | 70 | |
| Odor | Pumpkin | 56 | 28 | 28 | 18 |
| Carrot | 38 | 24 | 16 | 9 | |
| Mushroom | 7 | 46 | 54 | 76 | |
| Mild | 68 | 50 | 40 | 20 | |
| Strong | 8 | 19 | 21 | 29 | |
| Pungent | 1 | 10 | 9 | 14 | |
| Taste | Sweet | 72 | 46 | 35 | 21 |
| Bitter | 0 | 3 | 15 | 38 | |
| Sour | 6 | 2 | 6 | 18 | |
| Salty n.s. | 12 | 19 | 20 | 11 | |
| Flavor | Pumpkin | 63 | 43 | 44 | 26 |
| Carrot | 63 | 41 | 33 | 23 | |
| Mushroom | 8 | 46 | 56 | 82 | |
| Mild | 66 | 44 | 29 | 15 | |
| Strong | 8 | 22 | 39 | 49 | |
| Tactile | Spicy n.s. | 6 | 8 | 8 | 14 |
| Astringent | 7 | 5 | 10 | 20 | |
| Texture | Floury | 6 | 25 | 24 | 31 |
| Grainy | 7 | 35 | 59 | 74 | |
| Creamy | 96 | 56 | 47 | 29 | |
n.s., nonsignificant difference according to Cochran's Q test.
Significant difference for ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Products plot obtained from CATA
Figure 3Attributes plot obtained from CATA total frequency counts and liking