| Literature DB >> 30847143 |
Nan Xu1,2, Wenzheng Shi1,2, Xichang Wang1,2, Zhihe Wang1,2.
Abstract
Pacific White Shrimps (Litopenaeus vannamei) are an aquaculture species with global importance. For the purpose of this paper, the quality shelling process of Pacific White Shrimps, freshly harvested from farms and stored in a mixture ice water up to 24 hr, was investigated. Both the differences and correlations between the indexes such as peeling time, shrimp yield, chromatic aberration, texture, K value, TBA value, and microstructure were compared and analyzed. The optimal shell peeling time of Pacific White Shrimps was determined by ice water treatment for 8 hr. The shell peeling time was 1.77 min, the elasticity of the shrimp was 0.51 mm, the hardness was 2,124.58 g, K value was 1.33%, and TBA value was 0.004 mg/100 g. Both the smell and color of the shelled shrimp were normal. This study aims to endorse the mechanical shelling of Pacific White Shrimps.Entities:
Keywords: Pacific White Shrimps; ice water; shell
Year: 2018 PMID: 30847143 PMCID: PMC6392858 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Attributes assessed during the sensory evaluation of fresh Pacific White Shrimps
| Parameter | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | 4–6 | 7–10 | |
| Color | Black becomes bigger | Body slightly red or black | Shiny body surface, normal color |
| Odor | Slight ammonia odor | Neutral odor | Inherent smell of shrimp |
| Texture | Less meat quality, softer muscle tissue | Better meat quality, denser muscle tissue | Good meat quality, dense muscle tissue |
| Shell meat separation | Clingy, difficulty | Fairly easy | Separate, easy |
Figure 1Changes in the shelling time of Pacific White Shrimps treated by ice water
Figure 2Shrimp yield change of Pacific White Shrimps treated by ice water
Sensory evaluations of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
| Pretreatment time | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | |
| Texture | 9.40 ± 0.55a | 8.40 ± 0.55b | 8.40 ± 0.55b | 7.80 ± 0.45bc | 7.20 ± 0.84c | 6.25 ± 0.96d | 6.20 ± 0.45d |
| Odor | 8.80 ± 0.84a | 8.20 ± 0.45ab | 7.60 ± 0.55bc | 7.20 ± 0.84cd | 6.60 ± 0.55de | 5.80 ± 0.84ef | 5.00 ± 0.71f |
| Color | 9.60 ± 0.55a | 8.40 ± 0.55b | 7.60 ± 0.55c | 7.40 ± 0.55c | 6.20 ± 0.45d | 5.40 ± 0.55e | 4.60 ± 0.55f |
| Shell meat separation | 1.80 ± 0.84c | 7.40 ± 0.55a | 7.60 ± 0.55a | 6.20 ± 0.45b | 6.00 ± 0.80b | 6.25 ± 0.96b | 6.00 ± 0.82b |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Changes in ATP‐related compounds of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
| Contents (mg/100 g) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 hr | 4 hr | 8 hr | 12 hr | 16 hr | 20 hr | 24 hr | |
| ATP | 6.16 ± 1.01bc | 5.06 ± 0.92cd | 3.80 ± 0.61de | 6.82 ± 0.59ab | 8.13 ± 0.05a | 3.47 ± 0.02e | 1.83 ± 0.09f |
| ADP | 19.92 ± 0.31a | 18.12 ± 0.37ab | 17.19 ± 0.65ab | 18.77 ± 2.40ab | 15.86 ± 2.38b | 16.53 ± 0.07b | 16.16 ± 0.59b |
| AMP | 203.98 ± 6.55a | 193.65 ± 1.99a | 164.72 ± 3.73b | 157 ± 9.49bc | 136.85 ± 12.28cd | 129.28 ± 18.70d | 131.31 ± 6.02d |
| IMP | 23.73 ± 6.02e | 14.87 ± 0.00e | 54.94 ± 8.72d | 88.21 ± 2.44c | 108.10 ± 1.55b | 114.08 ± 0.81b | 125.62 ± 2.68a |
| HXR | 1.95 ± 0.18d | 2.17 ± 0.29cd | 2.65 ± 0.25abc | 2.82 ± 0.05a | 2.50 ± 0.2abc | 2.74 ± 0.06ab | 2.25 ± 0.26bcd |
| HX | 0.71 ± 0.01bc | 0.84 ± 0.01ab | 0.60 ± 0.05c | 0.89 ± 0.08a | 0.66 ± 0.05c | 0.91 ± 0.12a | 0.90 ± 0.00a |
| Total | 256.45 ± 2.06abc | 234.71 ± 3.00c | 243.92 ± 6.46bc | 274.52 ± 8.89a | 272.09 ± 16.42a | 267.01 ± 17.66ab | 278.07 ± 9.46a |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Changes in K value of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
Changes in color of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
| Pretreatment time (hr) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | |
|
| 37.94 ± 2.82c | 40.47 ± 2.81bc | 40.83 ± 4.2bc | 41.64 ± 2.84b | 42.02 ± 1.81b | 47.21 ± 4.43a | 41.75 ± 2.36b |
|
| −0.87 ± 0.48a | −0.92 ± 0.68a | −1.12 ± 0.72a | −1.16 ± 0.28a | −0.79 ± 0.09a | −1.40 ± 0.27a | −0.79 ± 0.23a |
|
| −1.68 ± 0.83ab | −1.73 ± 0.79ab | −0.96 ± 0.81a | −2.29 ± 0.53b | −2.16 ± 1.3b | −2.18 ± 0.68b | −2.13 ± 0.78b |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Changes in texture of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
| Pretreatment time (hr) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | |
| Hardness | 2,011.70 ± 205.78b | 2,022.38 ± 330.21b | 2,124.58 ± 172.19ab | 2,006.95 ± 192.62b | 2,291.50 ± 607.64ab | 2,349.77 ± 132.71ab | 2,562.43 ± 193.90a |
| Springiness | 0.72 ± 0.06a | 0.60 ± 0.07b | 0.51 ± 0.07c | 0.50 ± 0.04c | 0.50 ± 0.03c | 0.51 ± 0.02c | 0.49 ± 0.03c |
| Cohesiveness | 0.47 ± 0.04a | 0.42 ± 0.04b | 0.40 ± 0.03b | 0.40 ± 0.02b | 0.37 ± 0.03b | 0.38 ± 0.02b | 0.39 ± 0.03b |
| Gumminess | 857.85 ± 135.04a | 850.89 ± 114.87a | 877.07 ± 129.06a | 884.49 ± 66.05a | 892.77 ± 135.8a | 999.93 ± 53.69a | 991.67 ± 137.24a |
| Chewiness | 454.43 ± 145.63a | 465.10 ± 63a | 477.49 ± 20a | 447.79 ± 68.15a | 462.51 ± 76.73a | 473.4 ± 89.59a | 476.03 ± 47.18a |
| Resilience | 0.29 ± 0.01a | 0.25 ± 0.02b | 0.24 ± 0.02b | 0.24 ± 0.02b | 0.25 ± 0.02b | 0.24 ± 0.01b | 0.25 ± 0.02b |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Changes in hardness and springiness of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
Figure 5Changes in pH value of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
Figure 6Changes in TBA value of fresh Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
Chemical analysis of fresh Pacific White Shrimps
| Moisture (g/100 g) | Proteins (g/100 g) | Lipids (g/100 g) | Ashes (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79.11 ± 2.16 | 17.01 ± 1.23 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.11 |
Figure 7Muscle tissue structural change of Pacific White Shrimps during the ice water storage period
Correlation analysis between indicators
| Hardness | Springiness |
|
|
| pH | TBA | ATP | ADP | AMP | IMP | HxR | Hx | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | 1 | −0.422 | 0.257 | −0.134 | −0.349 | 0.310 | 0.065 | −0.678 | −0.437 | 0.004 | −0.307 | 0.404 | 0.033 |
| Springiness | 1 | −0.447 | −0.017 | 0.288 | −0.135 | −0.148 | 0.126 | 0.485 | 0.814 | −0.885 | −0.434 | −0.643 | |
|
| 1 | −0.336 | 0.094 | 0.315 | −0.569 | −0.071 | −0.409 | −0.643 | 0.621 | 0.393 | 0.519 | ||
|
| 1 | −0.117 | −0.352 | −0.112 | −0.217 | −0.005 | 0.042 | −0.010 | −0.046 | −0.213 | |||
|
| 1 | −0.020 | −0.099 | −0.324 | 0.131 | 0.349 | −0.403 | −0.121 | −0.492 | ||||
| pH | 1 | 0.135 | 0.128 | −0.049 | −0.240 | 0.317 | 0.517 | −0.192 | |||||
| TBA | 1 | −0.053 | 0.398 | 0.224 | −0.128 | 0.260 | −0.226 | ||||||
| ATP | 1 | 0.242 | 0.260 | −0.220 | −0.400 | 0.053 | |||||||
| ADP | 1 | 0.762 | −0.610 | 0.090 | −0.193 | ||||||||
| AMP | 1 | −0.945 | −0.276 | −0.521 | |||||||||
| IMP | 1 | 0.312 | 0.490 | ||||||||||
| HxR | 1 | 0.119 | |||||||||||
| Hx | 1 |
The numbers in the table indicate the correlation coefficient. The closer the correlation coefficient is to 1 or −1, the stronger the correlation coefficient is, the closer the correlation coefficient is to 0, and the weaker the correlation coefficient is.
*Denotes the significant difference, and **Denotes the extremely significant difference.