| Literature DB >> 30847138 |
Damian Laryea1, Debora Koomson1, Ibok Oduro1, Edward Carey2.
Abstract
The potential use of selected genotypes of sweetpotato for fries was evaluated. Moisture, fat, browning index, and beta-carotene content of fries from 10 sweetpotato genotypes, Apomuden, Bohye, Nanungungu, Otoo, CIP442162, Patron, CIP440390, Obare, Dadanyuie, and Tu-Purple, were determined by standard methods. Sensorial properties of the fries were further evaluated by an in-house trained panel of eight members using standard methods. Fat content was highest in CIP442162 and low in Dadanyuie, while beta-carotene content decreased by 44.27% in Bohye and 13.20% in Nanungungu after frying. Browning index was highest in the orange-fleshed and purple genotypes, but this was mostly due to their flesh colors and not the frying conditions. Fries from orange-fleshed genotypes, Apomuden and Nanungungu, were considered to be sweeter than the other genotypes. Detection of caramel and starch (rawness sensation) was very low for all genotypes assessed. Oily mouthcoat, moistness, and sogginess were detected in mostly the orange-fleshed genotypes, particularly Apomuden and Nanungungu. Tu-Purple, Bohye, and CIP440390 produced moderately crunchy fries and had the highest score for desirable attributes compared with the other genotypes. Tu-Purple, Bohye, and CIP440390 could be explored in commercial production of fries for enhanced utilization of developed sweetpotato genotypes.Entities:
Keywords: beta‐carotene; browning index; frying; sweetpotato fries; vitamin A
Year: 2019 PMID: 30847138 PMCID: PMC6392815 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Dry matter and starch content of sweetpotato genotypes
| Genotype | Starch content (%) | Dry matter (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 19.79 ± 0.06f | 32.97 ± 0.26abc |
|
| 17.59 ± 0.13e | 29.54 ± 0.58ab |
|
| 17.46 ± 0.20e | 36.31 ± 0.24abc |
|
| 16.50 ± 0.08d | 31.03 ± 0.17ab |
|
| 15.87 ± 0.06c | 29.97 ± 0.26ab |
|
| 14.46 ± 0.01b | 33.77 ± 0.25bc |
|
| 14.18 ± 0.15b | 36.08 ± 0.09bc |
|
| 14.11 ± 0.04b | 44.99 ± 0.75c |
|
| 14.09 ± 0.05b | 32.13 ± 0.20abc |
|
| 10.12 ± 0.03a | 24.05 ± 0.36a |
Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Values in the same column with the same superscripts are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Moisture and fat content of the sweetpotato fries
| Genotypes | Moisture content (%) | Fat content (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 10.79 ± 0.02a | 20.38 ± 3.45abc |
|
| 20.78 ± 0.20b | 23.54 ± 1.39bc |
|
| 21.35 ± 0.73b | 14.25 ± 1.21a |
|
| 22.24 ± 1.09bc | 18.54 ± 0.01abc |
|
| 25.25 ± 0.21 cd | 16.93 ± 2.43ab |
|
| 25.54 ± 2.04d | 23.96 ± 2.56c |
|
| 27.24 ± 0.08de | 14.95 ± 1.63a |
|
| 29.68 ± 0.65e | 17.96 ± 0.93abc |
|
| 33.43 ± 0.42f | 17.04 ± 1.48abc |
|
| 34.06 ± 0.94f | 14.00 ± 0.23a |
|
| 51.68 ± 0.13 g | 17.39 ± 0.76abc |
Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Values in the same column with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Color of sweetpotato fries
| Samples | Color parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | c* | H | BI | |
|
| 62.94 (0.03)d | 14.24 (0.07)a | 37.01 (0.04)a | 39.66 (0.06)a | 68.95 (0.08)b | 21.80 (0.07)h |
|
| 71.52 (0.11)h | 3.02 (0.03)b | 17.63 (0.02)b | 17.89 (0.02)b | 80.28 (0.08)e | 5.47 (0.04)c |
|
| 68.84 (0.05)f | 3.71 (0.01)c | 19.25 (0.01)c | 19.60 (0.01)c | 79.10 (0.02)d | 6.63 (0.01)e |
|
| 59.18 (0.01)b | 15.55 (0.03)d | 33.65 (0.05)d | 37.07 (0.06)d | 65.20 (0.01)a | 24.04 (0.04)i |
|
| 76.02 (0.07)i | 0.03 (0.00)e | 19.05 (0.04)e | 19.05 (0.04)e | 89.92 (0.02)g | 2.50 (0.00)a |
| CIP442162 | 70.58 (0.01)g | 1.19 (0.01)f | 25.89 (0.01)f | 25.92 (0.01)f | 87.38 (0.01)f | 4.87 (0.00)b |
| Tu‐Purple | 43.97 (0.04)a | 14.58 (0.02)g | −2.87 (0.00)g | 14.85 (0.01)g | 348.87 (0.04)h | 21.85 (0.02)h |
| CIP440390 | 67.89 (0.01)e | 3.46 (0.01)h | 16.45 (0.01)h | 16.81 (0.01)h | 78.15 (0.02)c | 6.05 (0.01)d |
| Otoo | 62.77 (0.01)d | 4.91 (0.01)i | 28.33 (0.00)i | 28.75 (0.00)i | 80.17 (0.02)e | 10.13 (0.02)f |
| Patron | 62.58 (0.01)c | 5.41 (0.01)j | 28.13 (0.02)j | 28.64 (0.02)i | 79.12 (0.04)d | 10.69 (0.01)g |
BI: browning index.
Values are represented as mean (standard deviation).
Values in the same column with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Figure 1Taste score for sweetpotato fries
Figure 2Appearance score for sweetpotato fries
Figure 3Texture score for sweetpotato fries
Beta‐carotene content of selected raw and fried sweetpotato
| Genotype | Beta‐carotene content (μg/100 g) | % loss of beta‐carotene | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw sample | Fried sample | ||
|
| 330.76 (12.84) | 184.32 (2.19) | 44.27 |
|
| 6,205.07 (39.84) | 4,281.11 (30.05) | 31.01 |
|
| 5,715.45 (33.18) | 4,961.23 (51.44) | 13.20 |
Values are represented as mean (standard deviation).