| Literature DB >> 30847136 |
Nazanin Darabzadeh1, Zohreh Hamidi-Esfahani1, Parisa Hejazi2.
Abstract
Nowadays, the use of agricultural by-products, as the cheap substrate for the production of value-added products, is of high interest for the researchers and practitioners. Cellulase is a relatively expensive and a very important industrial enzyme where in this study was produced form rice by-products under solid-state fermentation. A new mutant of Trichoderma reesei was used for cellulase production. The effective variables were initially screened by "Plackett and Burman design." Afterward, the main variables including moisture content, P source, incubation temperature, and incubation time were optimized by "one factor at a time design." Finally, the resulting variables including 74% for moisture content, 2 g/L for K2 HPO 4, 30°C of incubation temperature, and 4 days of incubation time were reported as the ultimate optimal condition for cellulase production.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma reesei; cellulase; mutation; optimization; screening; solid‐state fermentation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30847136 PMCID: PMC6392874 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
“Plackett and Burman design” matrix for screening variables influencing cellulase production and Filter Paperase (FPase) of each treatment
| Number | Mineral salts | Incubation time | P source | N source | Inoculation concentration | Moisture content | Incubation temperature | Filter paper activity (U/g dws) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 0 |
| 2 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 1.8 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 1.35 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 1.13 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 0.58 |
| 6 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 1.41 |
| 7 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 0.31 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 0.15 |
The variables were tested at two levels: the higher level designated as +1 and the lower level designated as −1.
Actual levels of variables tested with Plackett and Burman and Effect estimate of variables on cellulase production
| Parameter name | High level (+1) | Low level (−1) | Effect estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 35 | 20 | 0.1825 |
| Moisture content (%) | 75 | 55 | 1.1625 |
| Inoculation concentration (spore/ml) | 109 | 106 | −0.0025 |
| N Source (ammonium sulfate, yeast extract, and urea) (g/L) | 1.7 | 0 | −0.1225 |
| P source (K2HPO4) (g/L) | 2 | 0 | 0.6375 |
| Incubation time (days) | 6 | 3 | −0.1475 |
| Mineral salts | According to the method of Mandels and Weber | 0 | −0.0625 |
The solution is as follows: CaCl2 (0.3 g/L), MgSO4.7H2O (0.3 g/L), Tween‐80 (2 ml/L), and proteose peptone (1 g/L).
Effect of moisture content on cellulase activity (U/g dws)
| Moisture content (%) | Filter paper activity (U/g dws) |
|---|---|
| 65 | 0.206 ± 0.06c |
| 68 | 0.155 ± 0.05c |
| 71 | 0.747 ± 0.01b |
| 74 | 0.881 ± 0.02a |
| 77 | 0.713 ± 0.07b |
Statistically significant at 95% of confidence level.
Different letters indicate significant differences between the mean values within column.
Effect of K2HPO4 on cellulase activity (U/g dws)
| K2HPO4 (g/L) | Filter paper activity (U/g dws) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.82 ± 0.07ab |
| 2 | 0.98 ± 0.10a |
| 3 | 0.70 ± 0.10b |
| 4 | 0.66 ± 0.18b |
| 5 | 0.39 ± 0.04c |
Statistically significant at 95% of confidence level.
Different letters indicate significant differences between the mean values within column.
Effect of incubation temperature on cellulase activity (U/g dws)
| Incubation temperature (°C) | Filter paper activity (U/g dws) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
| 25 | 0.06 ± 0.01c |
| 30 | 1.16 ± 0.03a |
| 35 | 0.85 ± 0.19b |
| 40 | 0.00 ± 0.00c |
Statistically significant at 95% of confidence level.
Different letters indicate significant differences between the mean values within column.
Effect of incubation time on cellulase activity (U/g dws)
| Incubation time (day) | Filter paper activity (U/g dws) |
|---|---|
| 2 | 0.010 ± 0.009c |
| 3 | 1.117 ± 0.034b |
| 4 | 1.317 ± 0.018a |
| 5 | 1.359 ± 0.032a |
| 6 | 1.401 ± 0.042a |
Statistically significant at 95% of confidence level.
Different letters indicate significant differences between the mean values within column.