| Literature DB >> 30847105 |
Pan Shi1, Li-Jun Cao1, Ya-Jun Gong1, Ling Ma1, Wei Song1, Jin-Cui Chen1, Ary A Hoffmann2, Shu-Jun Wei1.
Abstract
Pest species are often able to develop resistance to pesticides used to control them, depending on how rapidly resistance can emerge within a population or spread from another resistant population. We examined the evolution of bifenazate resistance in China in the two-spotted spider mite (TSSM) Tetranychus uticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), one of the most resistant arthropods, by using bioassays, detection of mutations in the target cytb gene, and population genetic structure analysis using microsatellite markers. Bioassays showed variable levels of resistance to bifenazate. The cytb mutation G126S, which confers medium resistance in TSSM to bifenazate, had previously been detected prior to the application of bifenazate and was now widespread, suggesting likely resistance evolution from standing genetic variation. G126S was detected in geographically distant populations across different genetic clusters, pointing to the independent origin of this mutation in different TSSM populations. A novel A269V mutation linked to a low-level resistance was detected in two southern populations. Widespread resistance associated with a high frequency of the G126S allele was found in four populations from the Beijing area which were not genetically differentiated. In this case, a high level of gene flows likely accelerated the development of resistance within this local region, as well as into an outlying region distant from Beijing. These findings, therefore, suggest patterns consistent with both local evolution of pesticide resistance as well as an impact of migration, helping to inform resistance management strategies in TSSM.Entities:
Keywords: Tetranychus urticae; bifenazate; evolution; genetic structure; resistance
Year: 2019 PMID: 30847105 PMCID: PMC6392376 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Information on the 10 field populations of Tetranychus urticae used in the study
| Code | Collection location | Longitude (°E) | Latitude (°N) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCD | SiChuan Province, Chengdu | 104.0679 | 30.6799 | 25 | 21 |
| HNCS | Hunan Province, Changsha | 112.9632 | 28.0395 | 13 | 9 |
| AHHN | Anhui Province, Huainan | 116.8612 | 32.8090 | 18 | 16 |
| ZJJX | Zhejiang Province, Jiaxing | 120.9405 | 30.8844 | 17 | 15 |
| SXYQ | Shanxi Province, Yangquan | 113.3605 | 38.1727 | 23 | 14 |
| SDRZ | Shandong Province, Rizhao | 118.9034 | 35.8347 | 21 | 15 |
| BJC1 | BeiJjing, Changping | 116.4620 | 40.2134 | 27 | 19 |
| BJC2 | BeiJing, Changping | 116.4256 | 40.2008 | 18 | 22 |
| BJCW | BeiJing, Wandeyuan | 116.2165 | 40.2217 | 23 | 23 |
| BJDX | BeiJing, Daxing | 116.4252 | 39.6528 | 22 | 26 |
N: number of individuals examined in each population for cytb gene sequencing and microsatellite genotyping.
All haplotypes of the mitochondrial cytb gene of Tetranychus urticae identified in this study and retrieved from GenBank
| Haplotype | GenBank accession no. | Location/population of presence | Mutation (protein/gene) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hap1 | MH837177 | AHHN, HNCS | A269V/C806T |
| Hap2 | MH837178, | AHHN, HNCS, SDRZ, SXYQ, ZJJX, SCCD | Wild type |
| Hap3 | MH837179 | BJ, SCCD | G126S/G376A* |
| Hap4 | MH837180 | ZJJX | I86M/T258A |
| Hap5 |
| Laboratory | Wild type (susceptible) |
| Hap6 |
| Hoek van Holland, the Netherlands, Tuil, the Netherlands | G126S/G376A* and I136T/T407C* |
| Hap7 |
| Hoek van Holland, the Netherlands | G126S/G376A* |
| Hap8 |
| Nieuwveen, the Netherlands.Ghent, Belgium | P262T/C784A* |
| Hap9 |
| Laboratory | Wild type (susceptible) |
| Hap10 |
| Ghent, Belgium | Wild type |
| Hap11 |
| Brussels, Belgium | Wild type |
| Hap12 |
| Selected from LS‐VL | G126S/G376A* and S141F/C422T* |
| Hap13 |
| Laboratory | Wild type |
The mutations marked with a star are the sites associated with resistance to bifenazate.
Estimated lethal concentrations and resistance ratio for each population of Tetranychus urticae tested. For population codes, see Table 1
| Population | LC50 (95% CI) | LC95 (95% CI) | RR |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCCD | 475.03 (421.27–528.80) | 2061.16 (1,350.43–2,771.90) | 36.21 |
| HNCS | 103.02 (81.92–124.11) | 534.81 (208.99–860.63) | 7.85 |
| AHHN | 141.05 (130.99–151.12) | 349.13 (252.65–445.60) | 10.75 |
| ZJJX | 58.71 (36.56–80.86) | 787.88 (35.83–1539.93) | 4.47 |
| SXYQ | 53.50 (41.64–65.36) | 367.92 (130.23–605.61) | 4.08 |
| SDRZ | 41.10 (38.21–44.00) | 116.25 (95.10–137.39) | 3.13 |
| BJC1 | 368.03 (333.47–402.59) | 539.58 (476.85–602.31) | 28.05 |
| BJC2 | 302.06 (271.58–332.55) | 590.10 (377.30–802.91) | 23.02 |
| BJCW | 361.33 (266.25–456.40) | 3,489.86 (291.49–6,688.24) | 27.54 |
| BJDX | 307.41 (269.08–345.74) | 1,154.97 (630.49–1679.45) | 23.43 |
| Susceptible | 13.12 (12.70–13.53) | 23.58 (21.75–25.40) | 1.00 |
Shading indicates a higher RR ratio. For population codes, see Table 1.
CI: confidence interval; LC50: lethal concentration that leads to 50% mortality; LC95: lethal concentration that leads to 95% mortality; RR: resistance ratio calculated based on LC50.
Figure 1Dose–response cures of the 10 field and one susceptible Tetranychus urticae populations to bifenazate
Figure 2Collection map, distribution of four mitochondrial cytb gene haplotypes in 10 populations of Tetranychus urticae (a) and BAPS analysis of population genetic structure based on microsatellite loci (b). Population codes are listed in Table 1
Figure 3Mutations of the mitochondrial cytb gene in all available haplotypes of Tetranychus urticae identified in our study and downloaded from GenBank. The first four haplotypes marked with stars and three site mutations indicated by blue points are identified in this study; five sites marked by red triangles are previously identified mutations that are related to bifenazate resistance (Van Leeuwen et al., 2008); four sites marked by red points are conserved sites of cytb across multiple taxa (Van Leeuwen et al., 2008). The last nine haplotypes were retrieved from previously published references as shown in Table 2
Genetic diversity parameters in populations of Tetranychus urticae based on microsatellite loci
| Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCD | 2.9812 | 18 | 0.5774 | 0.4170 | 0.1893 |
| HNCS | 2.4978 | 13 | 0.4810 | 0.3817 | 0.2627 |
| AHHN | 2.5196 | 13 | 0.4834 | 0.3589 | 0.1046 |
| ZJJX | 3.0692 | 16 | 0.5883 | 0.3312 | −0.0129 |
| SXYQ | 3.1590 | 17 | 0.5314 | 0.4201 | 0.1950 |
| SDRZ | 2.8332 | 15 | 0.5098 | 0.4012 | 0.2437 |
| BJC1 | 2.6582 | 17 | 0.4698 | 0.3830 | 0.2817 |
| BJC2 | 2.4242 | 14 | 0.4423 | 0.3989 | 0.2028 |
| BJCW | 2.7854 | 17 | 0.4996 | 0.5048 | 0.2154 |
| BJDX | 2.6330 | 15 | 0.4972 | 0.4036 | 0.4472 |
For population codes see Table 1.
A R: average allelic richness; A T: total number of alleles; F IS, inbreeding coefficient; H e: expected heterozygosity; H o: observed heterozygosity.
Pairwise F ST among Tetranychus urticae populations based on microsatellite loci
| Population | SCCD | HNCS | AHHN | ZJJX | SXYQ | SDRZ | BJC1 | BJC2 | BJCW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNCS | 0.0575 | ||||||||
| AHHN | 0.0046 | 0.1373 | |||||||
| ZJJX | 0.0605 | 0.0908 | 0.1388 | ||||||
| SXYQ | 0.1534 | 0.2885 | 0.2068 | 0.0693 | |||||
| SDRZ | 0.1495 | 0.1908 | 0.2042 | 0.1922 | 0.2467 | ||||
| BJC1 | 0.0855 | 0.1058 | 0.1026 | 0.1558 | 0.2565 | 0.0978 | |||
| BJC2 | 0.1002 | 0.1571 | 0.1140 | 0.1384 | 0.2166 | 0.1034 | 0.0000 | ||
| BJCW | 0.0652 | 0.1394 | 0.0705 | 0.1043 | 0.1801 | 0.1203 | 0.0041 | 0.0000 | |
| BJDX | 0.0640 | 0.0881 | 0.0933 | 0.0955 | 0.2102 | 0.0707 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
For population codes see Table 1.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01 following Holm's correction.
p‐Value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in populations of Tetranychus urticae of five microsatellite loci
| Population | S05 | S158 | S167 | S19 | S65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCD | 0.0760 | 0.0269 | 0.7659 | 0.0598 | 0.1662 |
| HNCS | 0.0607 | 0.4414 | 0.1796 | 0.4940 | 1.0000 |
| AHHN | 0.0008 | 0.3148 | 0.0799 | 0.6114 | 1.0000 |
| ZJJX | 0.3585 | 0.3097 | 0.0093 | 0.1322 | 0.0019 |
| SXYQ | 0.0170 | 0.0000 | 0.7853 | 0.0408 | 0.0291 |
| SDRZ | 0.5807 | 1.0000 | 0.0475 | 0.4402 | 1.0000 |
| BJC1 | 0.4078 | 0.7168 | 0.3759 | 0.1620 | 1.0000 |
| BJC2 | 0.7551 | 1.0000 | 0.4574 | 0.2715 | 1.0000 |
| BJCW | 0.0185 | 0.6441 | 0.3870 | 0.3860 | 0.7210 |
| BJDX | 1.0000 | 0.2393 | 0.1192 | 1.0000 | 0.3193 |
S05, S19, S65, S158, and S167 represent five microsatellite loci, respectively, which are referred in previous work about microsatellite development in TSSM (Ge et al., 2013).
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationships (a) and discriminant analysis of principal components of population genetic structure of Tetranychus urticae based on microsatellite loci for all populations (b) and populations when outlier populations of SXYQ and ZJJX were excluded (c). Points with the same colors are individuals from the same population
Figure 5Heatmap of gene flow among ten field populations of Tetranychus urticae across China based on microsatellites estimated using BAYESASS. Dark color indicates high levels of gene flow from population (j)–(i), while the light color indicates a low level of gene flow