Literature DB >> 30846490

Differential payment to research participants in the same study: an ethical analysis.

Govind Persad1, Holly Fernandez Lynch2, Emily Largent2.   

Abstract

Recognising that offers of payment to research participants can serve various purposes-reimbursement, compensation and incentive-helps uncover differences between participants, which can justify differential payment of participants within the same study. Participants with different study-related expenses will need different amounts of reimbursement to be restored to their preparticipation financial baseline. Differential compensation can be acceptable when some research participants commit more time or assume greater burdens than others, or if inter-site differences affect the value of compensation. Finally, it may be permissible to offer differential incentive payments if necessary to advance the goals of a study. We encourage investigators and Institutional Review Boards to think about whether to offer payment, in what amounts and for what purpose, and also to consider whether differential payment can help promote the scientific and ethical goals of clinical research. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846490     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Incentives and payments in pragmatic clinical trials: Scientific, ethical, and policy considerations.

Authors:  Andrew Garland; Kevin Weinfurt; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Developing Data Sharing Models for Health Research with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review of Patient and Public Preferences.

Authors:  Anna Hermansen; Dean A Regier; Samantha Pollard
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.920

3.  Paying for Fairness? Incentives and Fair Subject Selection.

Authors:  Douglas MacKay; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Merrick Zwarenstein; Jamie C Brehaut; Charles Weijer; Spencer P Hey; Cory E Goldstein; Ian D Graham; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Joanne E McKenzie; Dean A Fergusson; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Towards a fair and transparent research participant compensation and reimbursement framework in Vietnam.

Authors:  Lucy J Sansom; Trang Pham Nguyen Minh; Iona E Hill; Quyen Nguyen Than Ha; Thuan Dang Trong; Celine Vidaillac; Nhu Dong Quynh; Hugo C Turner; Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil; Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong; Evelyne Kestelyn
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Clinical practice gaps and challenges in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis care: An international physician needs assessment.

Authors:  Patrice Lazure; Jeremy W Tomlinson; Kris V Kowdley; Paolo Magni; Raul D Santos; Ginny Jacobs; Suzanne Murray
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.754

7.  Using a theory-informed approach to explore patient and staff perspectives on factors that influence clinical trial recruitment for patients with cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices.

Authors:  Clair Le Boutillier; Claire Snowdon; Vishal Patel; Mark McPhail; Christopher Ward; Ben Carter; Ruhama Uddin; Ane Zamalloa; Vanessa Lawrence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.