Samuel W Hawes1,2, Rebecca Waller3, Wesley K Thompson4, Luke W Hyde5,6,7, Amy L Byrd8, S Alexandra Burt9, Kelly L Klump9, Raul Gonzalez1,2. 1. Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 7. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 8. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 9. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are critical to developmental, diagnostic, and clinical models of antisocial behaviors (AB). However, assessments of CU traits within large-scale longitudinal and neurobiologically focused investigations remain remarkably sparse. We sought to develop a brief measure of CU traits using items from widely administered instruments that could be linked to neuroimaging, genetic, and environmental data within already existing datasets and future studies. METHODS: Data came from a large and diverse sample (n = 4525) of youth (ages~9-11) taking part in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Moderated nonlinear factor analysis was used to assess measurement invariance across sex, race, and age. We explored whether CU traits were distinct from other indicators of AB, investigated unique links with theoretically-relevant outcomes, and replicated findings in an independent sample. RESULTS: The brief CU traits measure demonstrated strong psychometric properties and evidence of measurement invariance across sex, race, and age. On average, boys endorsed higher levels of CU traits than girls and CU traits were related to, yet distinguishable from other indicators of AB. The CU traits construct also exhibited expected associations with theoretically important outcomes. Study findings were also replicated across an independent sample of youth. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multi-site study, a brief measure of CU traits can be measured distinctly from other dimensions of AB. This measure provides the scientific community with a method to assess CU traits in the ABCD sample, as well as in other studies that may benefit from a brief assessment of CU.
BACKGROUND: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are critical to developmental, diagnostic, and clinical models of antisocial behaviors (AB). However, assessments of CU traits within large-scale longitudinal and neurobiologically focused investigations remain remarkably sparse. We sought to develop a brief measure of CU traits using items from widely administered instruments that could be linked to neuroimaging, genetic, and environmental data within already existing datasets and future studies. METHODS: Data came from a large and diverse sample (n = 4525) of youth (ages~9-11) taking part in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Moderated nonlinear factor analysis was used to assess measurement invariance across sex, race, and age. We explored whether CU traits were distinct from other indicators of AB, investigated unique links with theoretically-relevant outcomes, and replicated findings in an independent sample. RESULTS: The brief CU traits measure demonstrated strong psychometric properties and evidence of measurement invariance across sex, race, and age. On average, boys endorsed higher levels of CU traits than girls and CU traits were related to, yet distinguishable from other indicators of AB. The CU traits construct also exhibited expected associations with theoretically important outcomes. Study findings were also replicated across an independent sample of youth. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multi-site study, a brief measure of CU traits can be measured distinctly from other dimensions of AB. This measure provides the scientific community with a method to assess CU traits in the ABCD sample, as well as in other studies that may benefit from a brief assessment of CU.
Authors: Hailey L Dotterer; Rebecca Waller; Craig S Neumann; Daniel S Shaw; Erika E Forbes; Ahmad R Hariri; Luke W Hyde Journal: Assessment Date: 2016-04-06
Authors: Nora Maria Raschle; Willeke Martine Menks; Lynn Valérie Fehlbaum; Martin Steppan; Areti Smaragdi; Karen Gonzalez-Madruga; Jack Rogers; Roberta Clanton; Gregor Kohls; Anne Martinelli; Anka Bernhard; Kerstin Konrad; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Christine M Freitag; Graeme Fairchild; Stephane A De Brito; Christina Stadler Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Tyler M Moore; Antonia N Kaczkurkin; E Leighton Durham; Hee Jung Jeong; Malerie G McDowell; Randolph M Dupont; Brooks Applegate; Jennifer L Tackett; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Omid Kardan; Gaby N Akcelik; Andrew J Stier; Monica D Rosenberg; Donald Hedeker; Marc G Berman; Benjamin B Lahey Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2020-07-16
Authors: Rebecca Waller; Samuel W Hawes; Amy L Byrd; Anthony S Dick; Matthew T Sutherland; Michael C Riedel; Michael J Tobia; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Angela R Laird; Raul Gonzalez Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-01-22
Authors: Sarah J Brislin; Meghan E Martz; Lora M Cope; Jillian E Hardee; Alexander Weigard; Mary M Heitzeg Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Samuel W Hawes; Rebecca Waller; Amy L Byrd; James M Bjork; Anthony S Dick; Matthew T Sutherland; Michael C Riedel; Michael J Tobia; Nicholas Thomson; Angela R Laird; Raul Gonzalez Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 18.112