| Literature DB >> 30845744 |
Ognjen Rudić1, Vilma Ducman2, Mirjana Malešev3, Vlastimir Radonjanin4, Suzana Draganić5, Slobodan Šupić6, Miroslava Radeka7.
Abstract
This paper presents results regarding the phase composition, microstructure and textural properties of two types of aggregates, which were prepared via crushing or pelletization of alkali-activated Class F fly ash and cured under different conditions. The alkali activator was the same for aggregate products, containing an alkaline solution consisting of 8 M NaOH and Na-silicate (8 M NaOH/Na-silicate = 1:2.5 mass ratio). The aforementioned properties were influenced by two different preparation procedures combined with varying curing regimes (under normal conditions at 20 °C, RH 40⁻60% for 28 and 120 days and under an accelerated regime, at 65 °C for 5 days). Aggregates were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform transmission infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), back scattered electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometer (BSE-EDS) analyses and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The results showed noteworthy structural and textural diversities between the two types of aggregate. The method of preparation and curing regime affected the formation of the N-A-S-H structure and the texture of the alkali-activated fly ash product, with the crushing method giving an advantage.Entities:
Keywords: aggregate; alkali activation; crushing method; fly ash; pelletization
Year: 2019 PMID: 30845744 PMCID: PMC6427724 DOI: 10.3390/ma12050776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of FA (mass%).
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | CaO | MgO | Na2O | K2O | Cl− | SiO2r 1 | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.1 | 19.7 | 5.36 | 3.1 | 6.95 | 1.83 | 0.60 | 2.05 | 0.007 | 37.34 | 4.28 |
1 SiO2r—reactive silica.
Oven dried particle density, apparent particle density and water absorption of crushed and pelletized aggregates.
| Aggregate | Oven Dried Particle Density, kg/m3 | Apparent Particle Density, kg/m3 | Water Absorption after 24 h, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| GP 5 | 1495 | 2585 | 28.2 |
| GP 28 | 1490 | 2526 | 27.5 |
| GP 120 | 1492 | 2530 | 26.0 |
| VC 5 | 1470 | 2400 | 26.4 |
| VC 28 | 1348 | 2570 | 35.3 |
| VC 120 | 1450 | 2350 | 26.5 |
Figure 1FTIR spectra of (a) FA and GP samples, and (b) FA and VC samples.
Figure 2Deconvolution of Si–O asymmetric stretching band obtained by FTIR analysis. (Abs.: Absorption).
Absorption peak values of the deconvoluted FTIR spectra.
| FA | GP 5 | GP 28 | GP 120 | VC 5 | VC 28 | VC 120 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absorption peak position (cm−1) | ||||||
| 873 | 881 | 872 | 872 | 872 | 881 | |
| 902 | 902 | |||||
| 952 | 953 | 953 | 957 | 929 | 940 | 959 |
| 975 | ||||||
| 1023 | 1027 | 1021 | 1034 | 1017 | 996 | 1006 |
| 1041 | 1053 | 1041 | 1051 | |||
| 1093 | 1093 | 1083 | 1089 | 1089 | 1089 | 1089 |
| 1121 | 1127 | 1114 | 1113 | 1125 | 1125 | 1125 |
| 1136 | 1136 | |||||
| 1159 | 1160 | 1150 | 1153 | 1153 | 1153 | 1152 |
| 1171 | ||||||
| 1183 | 1178 | 1186 | 1175 | 1182 | 1182 | 1176 |
Figure 3XRD diffractograms of FA and GPs.
Figure 4XRD diffractograms of FA and VCRs.
Figure 5BSE micrograph of samples (a) GP 28 and (b) VC 28.
Figure 6BSE micrograph of sample VC 120, (a) silica phase, (b) alumino-silicate phase, (c) predominantly aluminum phase.
Figure 7Atomic ratios Si/Al vs. Na/Al for (a–c) GP and (d–f) VC aggregates.
Figure 8Atomic ratios (Na + Ca + K)/Al vs. (Na + Ca + K)/Si for (a–c) GP and (d–f) VC aggregates.
Slope values of the linear curve presented in Figure 8.
| Sample | Slope of the Linear Curve Si/Al |
|---|---|
| GP 5 | 2.94 |
| GP 28 | 2.41 |
| GP 120 | 2.51 |
| VC 5 | 1.88 |
| VC 28 | 1.93 |
| VC 120 | 1.95 |
Figure 9BSE-EDS analyses of the VC 120 sample; (a) dissolved part of a parent fly ash particle and (b) particle shell richer in Al.
Total porosity of GP and VC aggregates.
| Sample | Total Porosity (%) |
|---|---|
| GP 5 | 36.1 |
| GP 28 | 17.4 |
| GP 120 | 12.9 |
| VC 5 | 34.6 |
| VC 28 | 40.2 |
| VC 120 | 29.2 |
Figure 10Pore size distribution of (a) GP and (b) VC aggregates.