| Literature DB >> 30845325 |
Senjuti Saha1,2, Md Shfiqul Islam1, Mohammad Saiful Islam Sajib1, Shampa Saha1, Mohammad Jamal Uddin1, Yogesh Hooda3, Md Hasan1, Md Ruhul Amin1,4, Mohammed Hanif1,4,5, Mohammad Shahidullah6,7, Maksuda Islam1, Stephen P Luby2, Jason R Andrews2, Samir K Saha1,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Typhoid and paratyphoid remain the most common bloodstream infections in many resource-poor settings. The World Health Organization recommends typhoid conjugate vaccines for country-specific introduction, but questions regarding typhoid and paratyphoid epidemiology persist, especially regarding their severity in young children.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; paratyphoid; severity; typhoid; vaccine policy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30845325 PMCID: PMC6405278 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy1124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Figure 1.Typhoid and paratyphoid cases enrolled in this study. Abbreviations: IPD, inpatient departments; OPD, outpatient departments.
Figure 2.Proportion of paratyphoid cases within all enteric fever cases in Bangladesh, 2004–2016.
Figure 3.Age distribution of enteric fever cases in Bangladesh. A, Age distribution of all typhoid cases. B, Age distribution of typhoid cases in children under 5 years old. For children above 12 months old, the exact age, shown in black, was known only in some cases, where the exact date of birth of the child was available. The remaining cases, where the exact birth date was unavailable, and approximate age was recorded, were allocated evenly across months of that year, or “smoothed,” shown in gray. C, Proportion of typhoid cases in different age groups each year; only cases of children <12 years old were included here. D, Age distribution of all paratyphoid cases. E, Age distribution of paratyphoid cases in children under 5 years old. F, Proportion of paratyphoid cases in different age groups each year; only cases in children <12 years old were included here.
Figure 4.Severity of enteric fever with age. A, Proportion of typhoid patients hospitalized in the IPD (black), compared to proportion of typhoid patients treated in the OPD (gray), in each age group. B, Proportion of paratyphoid patients hospitalized in the IPD (black), compared to proportion of paratyphoid patients treated in the OPD (gray), in each age group. C, Distribution of durations of hospital stays of typhoid cases in each age group. D, Distribution of durations of hospital stays of paratyphoid cases in each age group. E, Distribution of durations of hospital stays of both typhoid and paratyphoid cases. Abbreviations: IPD, inpatient departments; OPD, outpatient departments. *Designates a significant difference of P < .001 (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test or Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed, depending on the group numbers).