Literature DB >> 30845178

Prevalence of infection by the microsporidian Nosema spp. in native bumblebees (Bombus spp.) in northern Thailand.

Chainarong Sinpoo1,2, Terd Disayathanoowat1, Paul H Williams3, Panuwan Chantawannakul1,4.   

Abstract

Bumblebees (tribe Bombini, genus Bombus Latreille) play a pivotal role as pollinators in mountain regions for both native plants and for agricultural systems. In our survey of northern Thailand, four species of bumblebees (Bombus (Megabombus) montivagus Smith, B. (Alpigenobombus) breviceps Smith, B. (Orientalibombus) haemorrhoidalis Smith and B. (Melanobombus) eximius Smith), were present in 11 localities in 4 provinces (Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Rai and Nan). We collected and screened 280 foraging worker bumblebees for microsporidia (Nosema spp.) and trypanosomes (Crithidia spp.). Our study is the first to demonstrate the parasite infection in bumblebees in northern Thailand. We found N. ceranae in B. montivagus (5.35%), B. haemorrhoidalis (4.76%), and B. breviceps (14.28%) and N. bombi in B. montivagus (14.28%), B. haemorrhoidalis (11.64%), and B. breviceps (28.257%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30845178      PMCID: PMC6405097          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Bumblebees (tribe Bombini, genus Bombus Latreille) play a vitally important role as native pollinators in temperate agricultural ecosystems [1-5]. They are especially important in mountain ecosystems [6] and may be better pollinators than honey bees for many plant species in these areas [7]. Because of this, some species of bumblebees have been employed commercially, especially in greenhouses [3]. From the 1980s onwards, they have been used commercially in greenhouses to pollinate tomatoes, eggplants, and strawberries and also for fruit trees [3, 8]. Several species have been used commercially around the world, including Bombus terrestris, B. lucorum, B. occidentalis, B. ignitus and B. impatiens [3, 9, 10]. Some bumblebees species (B. terrestris, B. ruderatus, B. hortorum, and B. subterraneus) had been released in New Zealand for targeted pollination in the 19th century [11]. Among species used commercially, the most frequent are B. terrestris in Europe and B. impatiens in North America [3]. The identification of bumblebee species has been difficult because the colour patterns can be highly variable within species and convergent among species [12]. In recent years, molecular approaches have been applied for bumblebee identification using particularly a mitochondrial gene (cytochrome oxidase I (COI)) [7]. COI barcodes provide an easily obtained, dependable and cost-effective solution, especially for morphologically cryptic species [13]. Consequently, the COI gene has been used to re-evaluate species, to estimate phylogenetic relationships and to clarify species complexes in Asian bumblebees [14-18]. Similar to Apis bees, bumblebee populations are affected by a number of pathogens and parasites [19]. Crithidia bombi (Trypanosomatidae) and Nosema bombi are the most common. They are transmitted both horizontally between and vertically within colonies of their hosts [20]. Nosema bombi (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) is an obligate intracellular microsporidian parasite infecting a wide range of bumblebee species [20-24]. It is the most widespread bumblebee pathogen worldwide. Thorp (2005) suggested that N. bombi, known to infect European Bombus species [25], may have invaded North American species [25]. Imhoof et al. (1999) showed that prevalence of N. bombi was significantly higher in two declining species, B. pensylvanicus and B. occidentalis, than in other species [26]. In addition, Nosema cerana and C. bombi are associated with declining populations of bumble bees in China [27]. In this paper, we aim to study the diversity of native bumblebees in northern Thailand and to report the prevalence of microsporidians and trypanosomes parasitizing bumblebee populations in Thailand.

Materials and methods

The sample locations for which specific permission was not required and bumblebee did not involve endangered or protected species.

Collection and sample preparation

Foraging bumblebees were collected with sweep nets and as random samples from seven sites in four provinces in northern Thailand (Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Rai and Nan province) in 2015 & 2016 (Table 1). After capture, they were transferred directly into RNA later Solution and stored at -20°C prior to DNA extraction. The following information was recorded for each specimen: GPS coordinates, elevation, collection-site name, and date. The samples were later analyzed in the laboratory. The exact locations are listed in Table 1 and shown in Fig 1. Bumblebee taxa were identified using an updated version of the morphological characters of Williams (2010) [28].
Table 1

Prevalence of four parasites recovered from Bombus species in northern Thailand.

Province populationCode NameElevationLatitude NLongitude EN Bees collectedPrevalence of parasites (%)
N. apisN. ceranaeN. bombiC. bombi
CHIANG MAI
Doi Suthep 1DS11,37818°48′55"98°55′13"60 0.00 3.33 10.00 0
Doi Suthep 2DS21,37818°48′55"98°55′13"20 0 5.00 15.00 0
Doi Inthanon 1DI12,11818°33′11"98°28′55"25 0 0 12.00 0
Doi Inthanon 2DI21,29718°32′41"98°30′58"40 0 7.50 20.00 0
Doi Inthanon 3DI31,07018°32′38"98°32′53"40 0 12.50 15.00 0
Doi Mae Tha ManDMTM1,61019°31′35"98°83′26"5 0 0 20.00 0
Doi Ang KhangDAK1,41019°54′8"99°2′24"25 0 4.00 8.00 0
Doi Mon NgaoDMNg93019°10′60"99°48′35"20 0 0 15.00 0
MAE HONG SON
Doi Mae U KhoDUK1,50918°53′41"98°05′21"20 0 10.00 20.00 0
CHIANG RAI
Doi ThongDT96020°17′18"99°48′35"20 0 5.00 20.00 0
Nan
Doi Phu KhaDPK1,98019°12′20″101°40′50"5 0 20.00 0 0
Total28005.7113.570
Fig 1

Map of the collection sites (grey dots) of native bumblebees in northern Thailand.

Code name are abbreviated as following: DS = Doi Suthep, DI = Doi Inthanon, DMTM = Doi Mae Thaman, DAK = Doi Ang Khang, DMNg = Doi Mon Ngao, DUK = Doi Mae U Kho, DT = Doi Thong, DPK = Doi Phu Kha.

Map of the collection sites (grey dots) of native bumblebees in northern Thailand.

Code name are abbreviated as following: DS = Doi Suthep, DI = Doi Inthanon, DMTM = Doi Mae Thaman, DAK = Doi Ang Khang, DMNg = Doi Mon Ngao, DUK = Doi Mae U Kho, DT = Doi Thong, DPK = Doi Phu Kha.

DNA extraction, mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) gene sequence amplification

DNA extraction was achieved using a single crushed mid leg from each of the bumblebees. For most specimens, legs were ground in a 0.5-mL oxygen tube in liquid nitrogen using a stainless steel pestle, a Proteinase K Digestion kit was used, and the DNA was extracted following a standard phenol-chloroform protocol [29]. DNA extracts were kept at -20°C until needed as a DNA template for the PCR (polymerase chain reaction). The PCR products of the mitochondrial COI (~685 base pairs) sequence were conducted using the universal primers LCO1490 and HC02198 [30]. The PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 2 μL of DNA extract, 12.5 pM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 mM MgCl2, 1X reaction buffer and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) under the following thermal conditions: 94°C for 1 min, 5 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1.5 min, 72°C for 1 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1.5 min, 72°C for 1 min and final step 72°C for 5 min. Amplicons were checked on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide under UV light. PCR products were purified using PureLink Quick PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Lithuania, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The purified PCR products were sequenced. Sequencing reactions were performed, and the sequences were automatically determined in a genetic analyzer (1st Base, Selangor, Malaysia) using PCR primers mentioned above.

DNA Isolation and PCR Detection for pathogen/parasite

The abdomens of 280 individual bumblebees were removed with scissors and individually homogenized in 100 μL of Krebs-Ringer solution with a sterile Eppendorf tube. Total genomic DNA was extracted from 50 μL of the homogenate of each abdomen using a DNA purification kit (PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen)). DNA samples were stored at -20°C prior to molecular screening for parasites. Primers used for detection of N. ceranae, N. apis, N. bombi and C. bombi are listed in Table 2. The PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 2 μL DNA extract, 12.5 pM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 mM MgCl2, 1X reaction buffer and 2.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). Amplification used thermal cycling profiles: initial DNA denaturation step of 4 min at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of 30s at 94°C, 30s at 56°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and terminated with a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. For each run of the PCR reaction, negative (water) and positive (previously identified positive sample) controls were run along with DNA extracts of the samples. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.2% agarose gels with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. Some of the PCR-amplified bands were purified with PureLink Quick PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Lithuania, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. After the sequencing reactions the sequences were determined automatically in a genetic analyzer (1st Base, Selangor, Malaysia) using the PCR primers mentioned above. The DNA sequences were used for estimating phylogenetic trees.
Table 2

Primers used for pathogen/parasite and mtDNA detection.

PrimerSequence 5′-3′Amplification targetSize (bp)Reference
RPS5-FAATTATTTGGTCGCTGGAATTGRibosomal protein S5 (reference gene) Evans (2006)[31]
RPS5-RTAACGTCCAGCAGAATGTGGTA 
LCO1490GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGGmtDNA685Folmer et al. (1994)[30]
HCO2198TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA 
Crith-FGGAAACCACGGAATCACATAGACCCrithidia (Trypanosome)500 Li et al. (2012)[32]
Crith-RAGGAAGCCAAGTCATCCATCGC 
Napis-SSU-Jf1CCATGCATGTCTTTGACGTACTATGN.apis (Microsporidium)325 Klee et al. (2007)[33]
Napis-SSU-Jr1GCTCACATACGTTTAAAATG 
NOS-FORTGCCGACGATGTGATATGAGN.ceranae (Microsporidium)252Higes et al. (2006)[34]
NOS-REVCACAGCATCCATTGAAAACG 
Nbombi-SSU-Jf1CCATGCATGTTTTTGAAGATTATTATN. bombi (Microsporidium)323Klee et al. (2007)[33]
Nbombi-SSU-Jr1CATATATTTTTAAAATATGAAACAATAA 

Data analysis

Sequences were checked manually and aligned using the BioEdit (version v7.2.6; http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/BioEdit.html, accessed 2017), and the primers removed from both ends (Table 2). The sequences were aligned using ClustalW and the alignments were refined by visual inspection. Sequences were used to query GenBank via the BLAST program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). All covering DNA cytochrome oxidase I (COI) region and Nosema parasites sequences obtained in this study can be accessed as NCBI GenBank entries (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; bumblebee species accession number MF582589—MF582628; Nosema parasites accession number MF776532-MF776567). For phylogenetic analysis, multiple alignments of sequences determined in this study and reference sequences obtained from databases were taken together in the calculations of levels of sequence similarity using ClustalX2 program [35], with arithmetic averages tree-making algorithms taken from the MEGA package version 7 [36]. The topologies of the maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were evaluated based on bootstrap analyses of 1,000 replicates.

Results

Geographical distribution

Samples were collected from Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Rai and Nan province, at an elevation range of 700‒2,200 m. (sample site; Fig 1, Table 1 and Table 3).
Table 3

A list of Bombus subgenera with information on distribution and species number.

SubgenusDistributionSpeciesNo. sampled
AlpigenobombusDS1. DS2 DI1, DI2, DI3B. breviceps28
MegabombusDS1, DI2, DI3, DAK, DUKB. montivagus56
MelanobombusDI1B. eximius7
OrientalibombusDS1,DS2, DI2, DT, DAK, DMNg, DPKB. haemorrhoidalis189
Our study of bumblebees in northern Thailand included 280 female bumblebees. Many of the bumblebees’ colour patterns were similar among species within northern Thailand. The dominant colour of the 6th abdominal segment was red in all of the specimens. Of B. montivagus, three distinct colour patterns were collected (Fig 2). In this study, similar colour patterns to those of B. montivagus were observed in co-occurring species, B. haemorrhoidalis and B. breviceps. The colour pattern of the thoracic pubescence of the workers was primarily orange. In B. breviceps, B. haemorrhoidalis, and B. montivagus, the described orange colour pattern runs anterior to posterior on the notum of the thorax. However, some species have extensive black hair on the thorax, ranging from a small patch in the center of the thorax to a transverse band between the tegulae (above the wing bases), or (in the case of B. eximius) the entire thorax. The sides of the thorax are orange or yellow in all species except B. eximius.
Fig 2

Species identification guide with simplified colour patterns of female workers.

The dorsum of the body is artificially divided into an arbitrary set of regions.

Species identification guide with simplified colour patterns of female workers.

The dorsum of the body is artificially divided into an arbitrary set of regions.

COI-sequence-based analyses

DNA was extracted and the COI gene sequence was amplified successfully from 40 individual bumblebee specimens from 11 localities. All of the sequences were 658 base pairs long after removing the primer from both ends. We found a strong A+T bias in the COI gene barcoding from mtDNA. All new sequences have been deposited in GenBank and are accessible via the sequence numbers MF582589‒MF582628 (Table 4).
Table 4

Material used in the phylogenetic analysis with the sample localities, collector, COI sequence length, depository and GenBank accession number.

SpeciesSample nameSample localityCollectorLatitudeLongitudeSequence length (bp)GenBankacc. no.
MontivagusDS1-B01TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582589
haemorrhoidalisDS1-B16TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582590
haemorrhoidalisDS1-B21TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582591
haemorrhoidalisDS1-B41TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582592
montivagusDI2-B06TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582593
haemorrhoidalisDI2-B16TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582594
haemorrhoidalisDI2-B31TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582595
montivagusDI3-B11TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582596
montivagusDI3-B21TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582597
brevicepsDI3-B27TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582598
haemorrhoidalisDMNg-B01TH, Doi Mon Ngao CMPC. Sinpoo19°10′60"99°48′35"658MF582599
haemorrhoidalisDMNg-B11TH, Doi Mon Ngao CMPC. Sinpoo19°10′60"99°48′35"658MF582600
haemorrhoidalisDAK-B01TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582601
haemorrhoidalisDAK-B14TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582602
montivagusDAK-B05TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582603
haemorrhoidalisDAK-B12TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582604
montivagusDAK-B22TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582605
haemorrhoidalisDAK-B06TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582606
haemorrhoidalisDAK-B10TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo19°54′8"99°2′24"658MF582607
montivagusDUK-B01TH, Doi Mae U Kho MHPC. Sinpoo18°53′41"98°05′21"658MF582608
montivagusDUK-B08TH, Doi Mae U Kho MHPC. Sinpoo18°53′41"98°05′21"658MF582609
haemorrhoidalisDT-B01TH, Doi Thong CRPC. Sinpoo20°17′18"99°48′35"658MF582610
haemorrhoidalisDT-B04TH, Doi Thong CRPC. Sinpoo20°17′18"99°48′35"658MF582611
brevicepsDI2-B20TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582612
brevicepsDI3-B30TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582613
haemorrhoidalisDS2-B01TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582614
haemorrhoidalisDS2-B02TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582615
haemorrhoidalisDS2-B03TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582616
brevicepsDS2-B04TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo18°48′55"98°55′13"658MF582617
brevicepsDI3-B01TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582618
BrevicepsDI3-B03TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′38"98°32′53"658MF582619
montivagusDI2-B01TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582620
haemorrhoidalisDI2-B03TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582621
BrevicepsDI2-B04TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582622
haemorrhoidalisDI2-B05TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°32′41"98°30′58"658MF582623
haemorrhoidalisDPK-B01TH, Doi Phu Kha NPC. Sinpoo19°12′20″101°40′50"658MF582624
haemorrhoidalisDPK-B02TH, Doi Phu Kha NPC. Sinpoo19°12′20″101°40′50"658MF582625
eximiusDI1-B02TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°33′11"98°28′55"658MF582626
eximiusDI1-B03TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°33′11"98°28′55"658MF582627
BrevicepsDI1-B04TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo18°33′11"98°28′55"658MF582628
The phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood method (Fig 3) with COI barcode data showed strong support for all of the following four conventional Bombus subgenera: B. (Megabombus) montivagus Smith (formerly regarded as part of B. trifasciatus s. l.), B. (Alpigenobombus) breviceps Smith, B. (Orientalibombus) haemorrhoidalis Smith and B. (Melanobombus) eximius Smith (Fig 3).
Fig 3

Estimate of phylogenetic relationship of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) from bumblebees (Bombus sp.) collected in northern Thailand using maximum likelihood.

The sequences of B. terrestris–JQ843621 was used as an out group. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values as percentages and only bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown.

Estimate of phylogenetic relationship of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) from bumblebees (Bombus sp.) collected in northern Thailand using maximum likelihood.

The sequences of B. terrestris–JQ843621 was used as an out group. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values as percentages and only bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown.

Microsporidian and trypanosome parasite frequencies in bumblebees

A total of 280 individual bumblebees representing four species (B. montivagus, B. haemorrhoidalis, B. breviceps, and B. eximius) were examined from samples from northern Thailand (Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Rai and Nan province, sampling sites shown in Table 1). We collected and screened for the most common pathogens of foraging worker bumblebees, Nosema spp. and Crithidia spp.. The results showed that 16 out of 280 individual bumblebees (5.71%) were infected with N. ceranae. This parasite was found in specimens of B. montivagus (5.35%), B. breviceps (14.28%), and B. haemorrhoidalis (4.76%). Nosema bombi was found in 38 individuals (13.57%) from the three species of Bombus as shown in Table 5. Infection rates of N. ceranae and N. bombi were higher in B. breviceps than in other bumblebee species. Nosema bombi was also more prevalent than N. ceranae in the three species of bumblebees. When considering the geographical areas, the highest prevalence values of N. ceranae (20% and 12.5% respectively) were found at the locations Doi Phu Kha (Nan) and Doi Inthanon 3 (Chiang Mai). Prevalence of N. bombi of 20% was found at Doi Inthanon 2, Doi Mae Tha Man (Chiang Mai) and Doi Mae U Kho (Mae Hong Son).
Table 5

Overall occurrence of four parasites in host species (Bombus spp.) (Identities confirmed from barcodes).

SpeciesN Bees collectedN. apis aN. ceranaeaN. bombiaC. bombia
B. montivagus560.005.3514.280.00
B. haemorrhoidalis1890.004.7611.640.00
B. breviceps280.0014.2828.570.00
B. eximius70.000.000.000.00
Total2800.005.7113.570.00

N = Total number of individual each Bombus species collected.

a = Prevalence (%)

N = Total number of individual each Bombus species collected. a = Prevalence (%) Phylogenetic trees were estimated to assess relationships between the samples of Nosema as shown in Fig 4A and 4B. This included a total of 36 sequences from infected Bombus with a length of 269 bp for 20 sequences of N. bombi and 212 bp for 16 sequences of N. ceranae, after removing the primers from both ends. New sequences of Nosema have been deposited in GenBank and are accessible with the numbers MF776532–MF776567 (Table 6).
Fig 4

The phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Nosema.

Unrooted consensus of phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Nosema isolate the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA of Nosema (4-A; N bombi, 4-B; N. ceranae) from Bombus spp. collected in northern Thailand. The tree was estimated using Maximum Likelihood. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values as percentages and only bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown.

Table 6

Material used in the phylogenetic analysis with the sample locality, collector, sequence length, depository and GenBank accession number.

SpeciesSample nameSample localityCollectorSequence length (bp)GenBank
1 N. bombiBomDS2-B06TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776532
2 N. bombiBomDS2-B12TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776533
3 N. bombiBomDS2-B20TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776534
4 N. bombiBomDS1-B04TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC Sinpoo269MF776535
5 N. bombiBomDS1-B10TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776536
6 N. bombiBomDS1-B37TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC Sinpoo269MF776537
7 N. bombiBomDS1-B45TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776538
8 N. bombiBomDS1-B55TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776539
9 N. bombiBomDI1-B04TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776540
10 N. bombiBomDI1-B07TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776541
11 N. bombiBomDI1-B11TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776542
12 N. bombiBomDI2-B17TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776543
13 N. bombiBomDI2-B24TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776544
14 N. bombiBomDI3-B07TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776545
15 N. bombiBomDMNg-B05TH, Doi Mon Ngao CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776546
16 N. bombiBomDMNg-B11TH, Doi Mon Ngao CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776547
17 N. bombiBomDMNg-B15TH, Doi Mon Ngao CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776548
18 N. bombiBomDMTM-B03TH, Doi Mae Tha Man CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776549
19 N. bombiBomDAK-B10TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776550
20 N. bombiBomDAK-B12TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo269MF776551
1 N. ceranaeBomDS2-B16TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776552
2 N. ceranaeBomDS1-B10TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776553
3 N. ceranaeBomDS1-B37TH, Doi Su Thep CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776554
4 N. ceranaeBomDI2-B02TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776555
5 N. ceranaeBomDI3-B02TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776556
6 N. ceranaeBomDAK-B10TH, Doi Ang Khang CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776557
7 N. ceranaeBomDUK-B10TH, Doi Mae U Kho CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776558
8 N. ceranaeBomDT-B16TH, Doi Thong CRPC. Sinpoo212MF776559
9 N. ceranaeBomDT-B16TH, Doi Thong CRPC. Sinpoo212MF776560
10 N. ceranaeBomDI2-B04TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776561
11 N. ceranaeBomDI2-B38TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776562
12 N. ceranaeBomDI3-B05TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776563
13 N. ceranaeBomDI3-B23TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776564
14 N. ceranaeBomDI3-B27TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776565
15 N. ceranaeBomDI3-B39TH, Doi Inthanon CMPC. Sinpoo212MF776566
16 N. ceranaeBomDUK-B19TH, Doi Inthanon MHSC. Sinpoo212MF776567

The phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Nosema.

Unrooted consensus of phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Nosema isolate the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA of Nosema (4-A; N bombi, 4-B; N. ceranae) from Bombus spp. collected in northern Thailand. The tree was estimated using Maximum Likelihood. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values as percentages and only bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown.

Discussion

In this study we aimed to identify native bumblebees from multiple sites in northern Thailand (Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Rai and Nan province). Three bumblebee species (B. montivagus Smith, B. haemorrhoidalis Smith, and B. breviceps Smith) show similar colour patterns. These colour patterns are similar to others in Southeast Asia and may have evolved though mutually protective Mullerian mimicry [37]. We have identified similar colour patterns for bumblebee workers (Fig 2) (three of them for B montivagus in northern Thailand). Hines and Williams (2012) examined colour-pattern evolution in bumblebees in this Southeast Asian mimicry group, which includes B. (Megabombus) montivagus Smith, B. (Alpigenobombus) breviceps Smith, and B. (Orientalibombus) haemorrhoidalis Smith [37]. Moreover, they reported that because these bumblebees also have high variability of colour patterns within species it is sometimes difficult to make reliable species identifications. Considerable colour variation within bumblebee species has been known for more than a century [38]. Our work reaffirms that only some morphological data can be used to accurately distinguish species. When possible, additional molecular data should therefore be used to confirm species identification [15, 37, 39, 40]. According to our results, the bumblebee species are supported by groups identified from the (COI) gene. This confirms the value of evidence from barcodes for examining the more closely related bumblebee species despite the variation within species [15, 40, 41]. This study is the first survey of the prevalence of major bumblebee pathogens in native bumblebees in northern Thailand, showing the detection and infection rates of N. cerana and N. bombi among 280 female bumblebee specimens. In this sample, N. bombi was present in three species of Bombus (i.e. B. montivagus, B. haemorrhoidalis, and B. breviceps). The complete gene encoding ssrRNA sequences of Nosema isolates were identical to those reported previously from the bumblebee species B. terrestris, B. hortorum, and B. lucorum [21]. Cameron et al. (2011) and Kissinger et al. (2011) could only analyze N. bombi in samples of various Bombus spp. from the southern states of the USA, which were genetically similar to the European isolates screened by these authors [5, 42]. In our results, the gene sequences showed small variations. In the past it was believed that among all Nosema taxa identified to date, only N. bombi was an established parasite of Bombus spp. [21] in which it may be present at varying levels [19, 43]. Thorp (2005) and Tay et al. (2005) suggested that N. bombi was the only microsporidian known to infect European Bombus species [20, 25]. Our study found that N. ceranae was also present in three Bombus spp. (B. montivagus, B. haemorrhoidalis, and B. breviceps). Normally, N. ceranae infects honey bees (originally isolated from A. cerana [44] now infecting A. mellifera as well [33, 45]), but Plischuk et al (2009) found N. ceranae in bumblebees in South America [46]. Our work also is similar to the findings of researchers who have reported the presence of N. ceranae in native bumblebees of Argentina (B. atratus, B. bellicosus, and B. morio) [46]. Mean prevalence values of N. ceranae found in B. breviceps (14.28%) are lower than those reported in B. atratus (72%) and B. bellicosus (63%) from Argentina [47] as well as from these same species in other countries [32, 48]. On the other hand, the lower infection intensity found in native bumblebees of northern Thailand may prevent infection from increasing further as natural reservoirs with high prevalence of the pathogen have not yet been found. We collected and screened the most common pathogens for total of 280 native foraging worker bumblebees. The trypanosome C. bombi was not observed in this study. Kissinger et al. (2011) also reported few C. bombi in his extensive survey [42]. Similarly, prevalence of Crithidia was less than 10% of all Bombus species examined in United States [49]. Previous studies have proposed that N. ceranae is closer phylogenetically to N. bombi than to N. apis [21, 50, 51], although there is a report to the contrary [52]. Shafer et al. (2009) suggest that N. apis is a basal member of the clade and, therefore, N. bombi is closer to N. ceranae [53]. In our study, N. ceranae strains present in three species of Bombus (B. montivagus, B. haemorrhoidalis, and B. breviceps) from northern Thailand were closely related to the N. ceranae strains reported from A. mellifera. This reaffirms that N. ceranae has a broad host range and may cross between host genera. Nosema ceranae was first discovered in A. cerana, however although it is now spreading to A. mellifera. This pathogen has potential as an emerging threat to bumblebees among the indigenous pollinators [54].
  26 in total

1.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Nosema ceranae, a new microsporidian parasite in honeybees in Europe.

Authors:  Mariano Higes; Raquel Martín; Aránzazu Meana
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Cytological variation and pathogenicity of the bumble bee parasite Nosema bombi (Microspora, Nosematidae).

Authors:  J I Ronny Larsson
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Nosema ceranae is a long-present and wide-spread microsporidian infection of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera) in the United States.

Authors:  Yanping Chen; Jay D Evans; I Bart Smith; Jeffery S Pettis
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Emerging dangers: deadly effects of an emergent parasite in a new pollinator host.

Authors:  Peter Graystock; Kathryn Yates; Ben Darvill; Dave Goulson; William O H Hughes
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  South American native bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infected by Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia), an emerging pathogen of honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Santiago Plischuk; Raquel Martín-Hernández; Lourdes Prieto; Mariano Lucía; Cristina Botías; Aránzazu Meana; Alberto H Abrahamovich; Carlos Lange; Mariano Higes
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.541

7.  High prevalence and infection levels of Nosema ceranae in bumblebees Bombus atratus and Bombus bellicosus from Uruguay.

Authors:  N Arbulo; K Antúnez; S Salvarrey; E Santos; B Branchiccela; R Martín-Hernández; M Higes; C Invernizzi
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Asymmetrical coexistence of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in honey bees.

Authors:  Yanping Chen; Jay D Evans; Liang Zhou; Humberto Boncristiani; Kiyoshi Kimura; Tieguang Xiao; A M Litkowski; Jeffery S Pettis
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Cryptic bumblebee species: consequences for conservation and the trade in greenhouse pollinators.

Authors:  Paul H Williams; Jiandong An; Mark J F Brown; James C Carolan; Dave Goulson; Jiaxing Huang; Masao Ito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators.

Authors:  M A Fürst; D P McMahon; J L Osborne; R J Paxton; M J F Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of pathogens in the invasive hornet Vespa velutina and in native Hymenoptera (Apidae, Vespidae) from SW-Europe.

Authors:  Luis B Gabín-García; Carolina Bartolomé; Carla Guerra-Tort; Sandra V Rojas-Nossa; José Llovo; Xulio Maside
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Susceptibility of Red Mason Bee Larvae to Bacterial Threats Due to Microbiome Exchange with Imported Pollen Provisions.

Authors:  Anna Voulgari-Kokota; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Alexander Keller
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Dominant bee species and floral abundance drive parasite temporal dynamics in plant-pollinator communities.

Authors:  Peter Graystock; Wee Hao Ng; Kyle Parks; Amber D Tripodi; Paige A Muñiz; Ashley A Fersch; Christopher R Myers; Quinn S McFrederick; Scott H McArt
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Nosema ceranae causes cellular immunosuppression and interacts with thiamethoxam to increase mortality in the stingless bee Melipona colimana.

Authors:  José O Macías-Macías; José C Tapia-Rivera; Alvaro De la Mora; José M Tapia-González; Francisca Contreras-Escareño; Tatiana Petukhova; Nuria Morfin; Ernesto Guzman-Novoa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.