Literature DB >> 30845044

Resident Surgical Skills Web-Based Evaluation: A Comparison of 2 Assessment Tools.

Ann E Van Heest1, Julie Agel1, S Elizabeth Ames2, Ferhan A Asghar3, John J Harrast4, J Lawrence Marsh5, Joshua C Patt6, Robert S Sterling7, Terrance D Peabody8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of surgical skill competency is necessary as graduate medical education moves toward a competency-based curriculum. This study by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) and the Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) compares 2 web-based evaluation tools that assess the level of autonomy that is demonstrated by residents during surgical procedures in the operating room as measured by faculty.
METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-four residents from 16 orthopaedic surgery residency programs were evaluated by 370 faculty using 2 web-based evaluation tools in a crossover design in which residents requested faculty review of their surgical skills before starting a case. One thousand, one hundred and fifty Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-Score) assessments, which included a 9-question evaluation of 8 steps of the surgical procedure, were compared with 1,186 P-score evaluations, which included a single-question summative evaluation. Twenty-five different surgical procedures were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in rates of resident requests or faculty completion of the 2 scores. The most common surgical procedures that were assessed were total knee arthroplasty (n = 254, 11%), carpal tunnel release (n = 191, 8%), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of stable hip fractures (n = 170, 7%), ORIF of simple ankle fractures (n = 169, 7%), and total hip arthroplasty (n = 166, 7%). Both instruments disclosed significant differences in competency among entry, intermediate, and advanced-level residents. The findings support the construct validity of the evaluation method. The survey results indicated that >70% of the faculty were confident that use of either the P-score or the O-score allowed them to distinguish a resident who can perform the surgery independently from one who needs additional training.
CONCLUSIONS: This research has led to the modification of the O-score and the P-score into a combined OP-score instrument. The ABOS envisions that the OP-score instrument can be used with an expanded number of surgical procedures as a required element of residency training in the near future. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study allows the profession of orthopaedic surgery education to take a leadership role in the measurement of competence for surgical skills for orthopaedic surgeons in residency training, an important clinically relevant topic to the practice of orthopaedic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30845044     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  3 in total

Review 1.  Use of the Behavior Assessment Tool in 18 Pilot Residency Programs.

Authors:  April D Armstrong; Julie Agel; Matthew D Beal; Michael S Bednar; Michelle S Caird; James E Carpenter; Stuart T Guthrie; Paul Juliano; Matthew Karam; Dawn LaPorte; J Lawrence Marsh; Joshua C Patt; Terrance D Peabody; Karen Wu; David F Martin; John J Harrast; Ann E Van Heest
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 2.  American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery's Initiatives Toward Competency-Based Education.

Authors:  Ann E Van Heest; April D Armstrong; Michael S Bednar; James E Carpenter; Kevin L Garvin; John J Harrast; David F Martin; Peter M Murray; Terrance D Peabody; Charles L Saltzman; Mona Saniei; Lisa A Taitsman; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Surgical Skill Can be Objectively Measured From Fluoroscopic Images Using a Novel Image-based Decision Error Analysis (IDEA) Score.

Authors:  Steven Long; Geb W Thomas; Matthew D Karam; J Lawrence Marsh; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.