Plasmonic supercrystals and periodically structured arrays comprise a class of materials with unique optical properties that result from the interplay of plasmon resonances, as well as near- and far-field coupling. Controlled synthesis of such hierarchical structures remains a fundamental challenge, as it demands strict control over the assembly morphology, array size, lateral spacing, and macroscale homogeneity. Current fabrication approaches involve complicated multistep procedures lacking scalability and reproducibility, which has hindered the practical application of plasmonic supercrystal arrays. Herein, these challenges are addressed by adding an organic solvent to achieve kinetic control over the template-assisted colloidal assembly of nanoparticles from aqueous dispersion. This method yields highly regular periodic arrays, with feature sizes ranging from less than 200 nm up to tens of microns. A combined experimental/computational approach reveals that the underlying mechanism is a combination of the removal of interfacial surfactant micelles from the particle interface and altered capillary flows. Assessing the efficacy of such square arrays for surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy, we find that a decrease of the lattice periodicity from 750 nm down to 400 nm boosts the signal by more than an order of magnitude, thereby enabling sensitive detection of analytes, such as the bacterial quorum sensing molecule pyocyanin, even in complex biological media.
Plasmonic supercrystals and periodically structured arrays comprise a class of materials with unique optical properties that result from the interplay of plasmon resonances, as well as near- and far-field coupling. Controlled synthesis of such hierarchical structures remains a fundamental challenge, as it demands strict control over the assembly morphology, array size, lateral spacing, and macroscale homogeneity. Current fabrication approaches involve complicated multistep procedures lacking scalability and reproducibility, which has hindered the practical application of plasmonic supercrystal arrays. Herein, these challenges are addressed by adding an organic solvent to achieve kinetic control over the template-assisted colloidal assembly of nanoparticles from aqueous dispersion. This method yields highly regular periodic arrays, with feature sizes ranging from less than 200 nm up to tens of microns. A combined experimental/computational approach reveals that the underlying mechanism is a combination of the removal of interfacial surfactant micelles from the particle interface and altered capillary flows. Assessing the efficacy of such square arrays for surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy, we find that a decrease of the lattice periodicity from 750 nm down to 400 nm boosts the signal by more than an order of magnitude, thereby enabling sensitive detection of analytes, such as the bacterial quorum sensing molecule pyocyanin, even in complex biological media.
Due to their strong interaction with electromagnetic
radiation, microarrays of plasmonic nanoparticles show great promise
as components for high-performance optical sensors, light managing
layers in thin-film solar cells, novel color displays, and other applications.[1−6] In this context, tight control over the array dimensions, internal
structure, and overall macroscopic homogeneity are crucial. The fabrication
of plasmonic mesostructures (i.e., structures with feature sizes ranging
from 100 nm to microns) with controlled properties still poses a significant
challenge, as it requires bridging vastly different length scales,
typically ranging from few nanometers up to several millimeters, for
technological feasibility.[7]Arrangements
of noble-metal nanoparticles are the most common class of plasmonic
nanomaterials for the fabrication of optical sensors, employed, for
example, in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) or surface-enhanced
infrared absorption (SEIRA) spectroscopy.[3,8] These
applications rely heavily on strong light–matter interactions
in the resonant noble-metal structure carrying the analyte to be detected.[3,9,10] Gold nanoparticles are often
the material of choice, as their stability against oxidation grants
easy fabrication of clean surfaces that can get into direct contact
with analyte molecules. For biosensing in particular, gold displays
further advantages due to its low cytotoxicity, which can be problematic
when using other plasmonic nanomaterials such as silver or copper,
for measurements in complex media or even in living systems. Among
the many accessible shapes, anisotropic nanoparticles such as gold
nanorods (AuNRs) excel due to the straightforward tunability of their
localized surface plasmon resonances via chemical adjustment of the
nanoparticles’ aspect ratio.[11,12] This geometrical
control allows precise tailoring of the desired excitation wavelength
and even achieving optical monodispersity.[13] Further signal enhancement, needed for chemical ultradetection or
even single molecule detection, requires optimization of near-field
and far-field coupling effects to boost light–matter interactions.
A strong near-field coupling relies on interparticle distances of
1–2 nm,[14−18] which in practice rules out purely top-down approaches such as e-beam
lithography or focused ion beam milling, which are just about to reach
gap dimensions below 5 nm.[19] Far-field
coupling, on the other hand, depends on diffraction and requires periodic
arrays with close-to-perfect registration over extended areas.[20] As a result, template-assisted self-assembly
of noble-metal colloids is the currently preferred fabrication strategy,
which efficiently combines both near-field and far-field coupling,
to take full advantage of optical enhancement.[21,22]For biomolecule detection, the ability to identify specific
substances within complex mixtures (often at submicromolar concentrations)
is of key importance and has fueled research in the field of SERS.
Recent highlights include the detection of prostate-specific antigens
in serum, multiplexed cancer type discrimination in cell cultures,
and even SERS-based in vivo imaging of tumors.[23] Self-assembled AuNR structures in particular have been
used for the detection of scrambled prions or pyocyanin (a bacterial
quorum-sensing molecule expressed by the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa) via SERS.[24,25] The supercrystals used in these examples exhibit strong plasmonic
near-field coupling due to the nanometer-sized interparticle distances,
thereby allowing molecular detection in vitro in complex biological
media, or even in situ in live bacterial cell cultures. However, in
these examples, the nanoparticles were assembled into isolated supercrystals
or micrometer-sized structures with array periodicities around 10
μm, and thus did not take advantage of far-field coupling. As
shown by Reinhard et al. for micrometer-sized arrays, near-field coupled
colloidal clusters can deliver significantly amplified signal outputs
when arranged in a periodic lattice.[26] The
far-field modes of the array must therefore be in resonance with the
exciting light source, usually demanding submicrometer lattice periodicities.
These so-called lattice plasmons comprise an attractive route toward
SERS substrates that offer high sensitivity with low noble metal consumption
and a reduced laser power.[22]Despite
recent reports on the colloidal assembly of AuNRs into micrometer-sized
supercrystals, the production of high-quality AuNR arrays with submicrometer
feature sizes has proven to be an extraordinarily elusive task.[27] Most of the current strategies are complicated,
multistep procedures based on pre-assembly by spin or dip coating,
followed by transfer printing onto a target substrate.[28,29] In fact, there is little understanding of the factors influencing
macroscopic array homogeneity, which include particle surface functionalization,
residual surfactant, and wetting of both the stamp and the target
substrate. Thus, the scaling and reproducibility of such assembly
methods remain problematic. Recently, regular AuNR arrangements have
been realized by combining topographically structured templates with
controlled convective assembly or electrophoretic deposition techniques.[30−32] However, to the best of our knowledge, no fast, scalable method
is available that yields homogeneous arrays of regular AuNR mesostructures
over macroscopic surface areas, with no need for sophisticated equipment.We present herein an optimized approach for the self-assembly of
gold nanorods (length: 55 ± 5 nm, diameter: 16.5 ± 1.5 nm)
coated with (11-mercaptoundecyl)hexa(ethylene glycol) (MUHEG) into
highly regular structures, using ethanol/water mixtures as the dispersion
media. Functionalization with MUHEG has been shown to foster side-by-side
organization of nanorods into structures with feature sizes between
1 and 50 μm for assembly from aqueous dispersions.[27] In this work, much smaller, hierarchically structured
plasmonic arrays with feature sizes ranging from 200 nm up to 10 μm
and periodicities from 400 nm to 20 μm are realized by a solvent-assisted
approach. Through systematic optimization of solvent composition and
particle and surfactant concentrations, as well as a detailed investigation
of the role of substrate application timing, mesostructured AuNR arrays
with unprecedented quality are achieved over areas as large as 0.5
cm2. All-atom molecular dynamic (MD) simulations are used
to elucidate the role of the volatile solvent (ethanol) in improving
the nanoparticle self-assembly, which is experimentally confirmed
by ζ-potential measurements. Ethanol is shown to strip away
excess cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) micelles from the MUHEG/water
interface, thereby increasing the hydrophobicity of the particles
and triggering reversible agglomeration. We thus propose an assembly
mechanism that takes into account the preorganization of nanoparticles
at the liquid/gas interface, which is further confirmed by a kinetic
study via photomicroscopy of drying droplets and correlated atomic
force microscopy (AFM)/scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization
of the resulting substrates. Finally, application of the obtained
plasmonic materials as SERS sensors for biomolecule detection is demonstrated
both in water and in complex biological media.
Results and Discussion
Template-assisted nanoparticle deposition has recently become a
promising nanofabrication method that combines bottom-up and top-down
approaches. The scalability of this method has been largely facilitated
by the synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles in various shapes, with
high monodispersity,[33−35] along with simple and inexpensive production of microstructured
stamps by soft lithography.[16,36,37] However, the quality of the nanomaterial is often compromised because
of the well-known coffee ring effect: inhomogeneous material distribution
(in the worst case, accumulation outside of the structured area) is
observed when the dispersed nanoparticles are driven toward the rim
of the confined droplet during drying due to convective forces (Figure a).[38] We recently reported that template-assisted assembly of
sterically stabilized (i.e., poly(ethylene glycol)-capped) gold nanospheres
(PEG–AuNSs) improved when the amount of residual surfactant
cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) in the dispersion was kept
far below its critical micellar concentration (cmc of CTAC: 1.6 mM
at 25 °C).[39] The most homogeneous
structures were achieved with a surfactant concentration of around
50 μM, at which the nanospheres would slowly agglomerate in
the dispersion, forming extended golden films on the hydrophobic walls
of plastic storage vessels.[22] For the MUHEG-coated
rods used in this study, we could neither replicate the described
effects nor sufficiently suppress the dominant coffee ring effect
by simply decreasing the concentration of free surfactant, which was
tested down to 30 μM residual surfactant (see Figures b and S2). To improve the wetting of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
stamp,[40] ethanol (EtOH) was added to the
dispersions, thereby enabling a nearly complete suppression of the
coffee ring formation, which had strongly hindered the fabrication
of well-defined AuNR arrays over areas larger than a few hundred μm2.[27] Unexpectedly, the presence
of EtOH also changed the orientation of the nanorods from standing
rods into side-by-side packed lamellae, as shown in Figures c and S3.
Figure 1
Comparison of MUHEG–AuNR assembly from water vs EtOH/water
mixtures. (a) Scheme of the patterning process, which comprised drying
of a dispersion droplet confined between a structured soft PDMS stamp
and a flat target substrate. (b) SEM images of the best microarrays
that could be obtained from MUHEG-coated AuNRs dispersed in water.
(c) Representative SEM images from an arbitrary part of a typical
substrate obtained with the same particles but now dispersed in an
EtOH/water mixture. Only with ethanolic dispersions, large area pattern
replication was possible, and highly regular arrays of lying rod lamellae
were formed.
Comparison of MUHEG–AuNR assembly from water vs EtOH/water
mixtures. (a) Scheme of the patterning process, which comprised drying
of a dispersion droplet confined between a structured soft PDMS stamp
and a flat target substrate. (b) SEM images of the best microarrays
that could be obtained from MUHEG-coated AuNRs dispersed in water.
(c) Representative SEM images from an arbitrary part of a typical
substrate obtained with the same particles but now dispersed in an
EtOH/water mixture. Only with ethanolic dispersions, large area pattern
replication was possible, and highly regular arrays of lying rod lamellae
were formed.Intriguingly, ethanol-containing
AuNR dispersions yielding high-quality assemblies displayed a macroscopic
appearance reminiscent of previously described PEG–AuNS dispersions,
i.e., a bright metallic luster.[22] For fixed
ambient temperature and humidity, this characteristic golden shimmer
was consistently observed after a composition-controlled induction
period, during which the alcohol/water mixture was allowed to evaporate
partially: depending on particle concentration and EtOH content (see
Materials and Methods in the Supporting Information (SI)), the drying droplets changed their appearance from dark brown
to golden within seconds to minutes when AuNRs initiated pre-assembly
at the air/liquid interface, as illustrated in Figure a.[41] This pre-assembly
process, not observed in purely aqueous dispersions, was found to
consistently start at the droplet rim, i.e., the area of highest curvature
and drying speed, indicating that the process is driven by convection
due to EtOH evaporation.[42] The macroscopic
appearance of a droplet (insets of Figure b–d) at selected stages of evaporation
can be correlated with the resulting mesostructures, as revealed by
subsequent SEM measurements exemplified in Figure b–d. A clear relationship between
the aggregation state of AuNRs at the air/liquid interface at the
moment of contacting the substrate and the final particle distribution
after drying was established: at short pre-assembly times, most of
the liquid was found to move toward the nonpatterned rim of the PDMS
stamp/substrate sandwich, where the particles would accumulate to
form the characteristic coffee ring. The opposite trend was observed
for long pre-assembly times, where extended particle aggregation led
to overfilling of the patterned central region. Slight particle agglomeration
turned out to be most advantageous, since medium-sized lamellar AuNR
clusters possess a moderate hydrodynamic mobility and cannot easily
migrate to the rim or accumulate at the center of the substrate/stamp
sandwich (Figure S4).[43] In general, the quality of the local array structure and
the overall macroscopic surface homogeneity were optimal when the
substrates were placed onto the stamp just before the surface of the
droplets turned golden (see the SI: Materials and Methods and Figure S5).
Figure 2
Influence of pre-evaporation and correlation
between droplet appearance and the resulting assembly structure. Partial
evaporation of EtOH leads to the pre-assembly of the AuNRs at the
liquid–air interface, causing a golden shimmer at the droplet
surface due to interparticle coupling (a and inset droplet photos).
For identical initial composition and volume of the dispersion, contact
with the target substrate at different times leads to distinct substrate
qualities (b–d). The degree of pre-assembly directly correlates
with the amount of particles deposited on the structured substrate
area, where the underfilled surface is marked with a red frame, the
optimally prepared sample with a green frame, and a vastly overfilled
array with a blue one.
Influence of pre-evaporation and correlation
between droplet appearance and the resulting assembly structure. Partial
evaporation of EtOH leads to the pre-assembly of the AuNRs at the
liquid–air interface, causing a golden shimmer at the droplet
surface due to interparticle coupling (a and inset droplet photos).
For identical initial composition and volume of the dispersion, contact
with the target substrate at different times leads to distinct substrate
qualities (b–d). The degree of pre-assembly directly correlates
with the amount of particles deposited on the structured substrate
area, where the underfilled surface is marked with a red frame, the
optimally prepared sample with a green frame, and a vastly overfilled
array with a blue one.A detailed kinetic study of the process for varying composition
of the dispersion medium is summarized in Figure , which shows that an increase in the initial
EtOH/H2O ratio has an effect similar to a reduced duration
of the evaporation period. Four different morphologies can be distinguished,
which are marked with frames of different colors: apart from the above
discussed three scenarios, namely “underfilled” (red
frame), “optimally filled” (green frame), and “overfilled”
(blue frame), we found that for long evaporation periods or very low
initial EtOH content, nearly empty substrate centers (black frame)
were obtained. This emergence of a dominant coffee ring effect can
be attributed to the redispersion of agglomerated particles after
the evaporation of a major fraction of added EtOH (Figure S4).
Figure 3
Influence of initial EtOH content and evaporation time
prior to contact with the substrate (particle concentration constant
@ 100 mM Au0). Four different substrate qualities can be
distinguished, marked with colored frames in (a). EtOH concentrations
below 33 vol % always yielded empty substrate centers. Dispersions
with higher alcohol content produced very homogeneous arrays (green),
with correct timing. To avoid underfilling (red), longer waiting times
were required for higher initial EtOH concentrations, whereby excessive
solvent evaporation leads to particle accumulation at the substrate
center (blue) in all series. AFM height images in (b) for substrates
from the series with an initial EtOH content of 66 vol % correspond
to evaporation times of 10, 75, 120, and 180 s (from left to right).
The cross sections in (c) were measured for the bottom row of the
corresponding square arrays in the AFM images and plotted with an
offset in the z-direction for the sake of clarity.
Influence of initial EtOH content and evaporation time
prior to contact with the substrate (particle concentration constant
@ 100 mM Au0). Four different substrate qualities can be
distinguished, marked with colored frames in (a). EtOH concentrations
below 33 vol % always yielded empty substrate centers. Dispersions
with higher alcohol content produced very homogeneous arrays (green),
with correct timing. To avoid underfilling (red), longer waiting times
were required for higher initial EtOH concentrations, whereby excessive
solvent evaporation leads to particle accumulation at the substrate
center (blue) in all series. AFM height images in (b) for substrates
from the series with an initial EtOH content of 66 vol % correspond
to evaporation times of 10, 75, 120, and 180 s (from left to right).
The cross sections in (c) were measured for the bottom row of the
corresponding square arrays in the AFM images and plotted with an
offset in the z-direction for the sake of clarity.With this effect in mind, we investigated
whether the optimum time for contact with the substrate was determined
by the EtOH/H2O ratio at the moment of substrate contact
(i.e., independent of the concentration of dispersed particles), or
by the amount of pre-assembled particle clusters at the droplet surface
(i.e., strongly dependent on particle concentration in the dispersion).
As shown in Figure for fixed waiting time and initial EtOH/H2O ratio, increasing
the particle concentration also lead to particle accumulation at the
substrate centers (see Figure S6 for macroscopic
characterization). We therefore conclude that the outcome of the assembly
process is mainly determined by the state of particle agglomeration
at the liquid–air interface at the moment of contact with the
substrate.
Figure 4
Influence of the particle concentration on array height and homogeneity.
(a–d) AFM height images of representative arrays prepared with
identical initial EtOH concentration, timing of substrate application,
and surfactant concentration. Particle concentrations were varied
within the range [Au0] = 50–500 mM. From (a) to
(c), the height of the separated AuNR posts gradually increased, until
a film of connected posts was obtained at the highest concentration
(d).
Influence of the particle concentration on array height and homogeneity.
(a–d) AFM height images of representative arrays prepared with
identical initial EtOH concentration, timing of substrate application,
and surfactant concentration. Particle concentrations were varied
within the range [Au0] = 50–500 mM. From (a) to
(c), the height of the separated AuNR posts gradually increased, until
a film of connected posts was obtained at the highest concentration
(d).To better understand the influence
of EtOH on the assembly behavior of the AuNRs, the molecular interactions
of MUHEG-coated Au surfaces in contact with the solvent were simulated
using all-atom molecular dynamics. These simulations reproduced the
environment of the AuNRs in the real dispersions, where CTAB was present
at concentrations ranging from 30 to 500 μM. The equilibrated
system shows that some CTA+ molecules reside within the
MUHEG layer with their quaternary ammonium headgroups oriented toward
the Au surface, whereas CTAB micelles form and reside at the MUHEG–water
interface (Figure S7). In pure water, the
CTAB micelle remained bound at the interface of the MUHEG layer for
the entire duration of the simulation, which is attributed to minimization
of the free energy by reducing the amount of interfacial water (Figure S7b). Following 200 ns of simulation in
pure water, water molecules were removed from the system and replaced
with either pure EtOH (Figure S8) or 52%
(v/v) EtOH in water (Figure ). As demonstrated by the timeline of the simulation trajectories,
the introduction of EtOH results in a quick dissociation of the CTAB
micelle from the MUHEG interface, even in a mixture with water (Figures a and S9).
Figure 5
All-atom molecular dynamics simulations of CTAB
micelles interacting with a MUHEG-functionalized Au(100) surface (91
MUHEG and 71 CTAB molecules in 52% (v/v) EtOH) and experimental verification.
Initial atom coordinates in (a) are derived from a separate 100 ns
simulation in pure water. The originally bound surfactant micelle
completely detaches from the MUHEG ligand layer within 125 ns after
switching the solvent from pure water to an EtOH-containing mixture.
(b) Addition of EtOH to a particle dispersion ([CTAB] = 500 μM)
causes a strong decay of the ζ-potential above 25% (v/v) of
alcohol. At 35% (v/v) EtOH, surface-bound surfactant micelles are
completely detached, leaving the particle surface uncharged. (c) In
UV–vis spectroscopy measurements, fast agglomeration of the
AuNRs at intermediate EtOH concentrations of 30–45% (v/v) becomes
obvious.
All-atom molecular dynamics simulations of CTAB
micelles interacting with a MUHEG-functionalized Au(100) surface (91
MUHEG and 71 CTAB molecules in 52% (v/v) EtOH) and experimental verification.
Initial atom coordinates in (a) are derived from a separate 100 ns
simulation in pure water. The originally bound surfactant micelle
completely detaches from the MUHEG ligand layer within 125 ns after
switching the solvent from pure water to an EtOH-containing mixture.
(b) Addition of EtOH to a particle dispersion ([CTAB] = 500 μM)
causes a strong decay of the ζ-potential above 25% (v/v) of
alcohol. At 35% (v/v) EtOH, surface-bound surfactant micelles are
completely detached, leaving the particle surface uncharged. (c) In
UV–vis spectroscopy measurements, fast agglomeration of the
AuNRs at intermediate EtOH concentrations of 30–45% (v/v) becomes
obvious.Regardless of the initial position
of the CTAB micelle at the MUHEG/solvent interface, dissociation of
the micelle from the interface could be clearly observed after 100
ns, both in pure EtOH and in the water/EtOH mixture (Figures a and S8). Visual observations are confirmed by the radial distribution
function of the quaternary ammonium headgroup of CTA+ interacting
with the terminal −OH group of MUHEG, which was significantly
decreased by the end of simulations in both EtOH and the water/EtOH
mixture (Figure S9b,d). The electron density
of the system over the simulation trajectory also exhibits the dissociation
of the CTAB micelle from the MUHEG/solvent interface (Figure S9a,c). The removal of adsorbed CTAB micelles
can explain both the experimentally observed clustering of AuNRs and
their increased affinity toward the air–liquid interface, as
the result of a more hydrophobic character of the particle coating.To verify the mechanism supported by the MD simulations, we conducted
ζ-potential and UV–vis spectroscopy measurements of AuNR
colloids for varying CTAB and EtOH concentrations. In water, the particles
exhibited a strongly positive ζ-potential, even far below the
cmc of CTAB (e.g., +35 mV above 100 μM; Figure S10). With EtOH contents above 25% (v/v), however,
the surface charge dropped, reaching 0 mV at 35% (v/v) and −10
mV at 45% (v/v) EtOH (Figure b). Whereas AuNRs were prepared and stored at CTAB concentrations
above the cmc (1 mM), ζ-potential measurements were conducted
after dilution, well below the cmc (30 μM ≤ [CTAB] ≤
500 μM). These data support the hypothesis that, in water, CTAB
micelles remain bound to the AuNR–MUHEG interface far below
the cmc ([CTAB] ≥ 30 μM) but are readily removed by EtOH.
The resulting loss of colloidal stability is mirrored in the UV–vis
spectra (Figure c)
showing peaks around 600 nm that are characteristic for side-to-side
aggregation of AuNRs.[44] Collectively, these
results make a strong case for the idea that EtOH efficiently triggers
the agglomeration and surface activity of AuNRs, thereby reducing
particle mobility during drying and ultimately leading to a strongly
altered self-assembly behavior. Similar trapping of nanoparticles
at the liquid–air interface has been recognized as a method
for reducing coffee stains and building highly ordered close-packed
layers.[41]Interestingly, the surfactant
concentration itself influences the structure of self-assembled AuNR
arrays in a counter-intuitive manner. Whereas for dispersions in pure
water the quality of the assembly deteriorated when increasing the
surfactant concentration, EtOH-containing dispersions were less influenced
by this parameter, as CTAB concentrations up to 500 μM did not
significantly alter the homogeneity and array dimensions. However,
the concentration of free surfactant did influence the average height
of the individual posts, leading to roughly 3-fold higher structures
when CTAB concentration was increased from 20 up to 500 μM (Figure ). As the volume
occupied by CTAB is negligible compared to the volume of gold in all
cases (around 100 μM CTAB vs 100 mM Au0), such height
differences must be caused by varying amounts of particles being deposited
outside the patterned stamp area.
Figure 6
Influence of CTAB surfactant concentration
(20–500 μm). (a) Photographs of three substrates obtained
at different [CTAB], revealing similar macroscopic homogeneity. (b)
Cross sections measured from AFM height images (c), which show increasing
average post height with surfactant concentration in the dispersion,
and the presence of an elevated rim in all posts. (d) SEM micrographs
for low and intermediate CTAB concentrations demonstrate that complete
filling is only reached above a minimum surfactant concentration.
Influence of CTAB surfactant concentration
(20–500 μm). (a) Photographs of three substrates obtained
at different [CTAB], revealing similar macroscopic homogeneity. (b)
Cross sections measured from AFM height images (c), which show increasing
average post height with surfactant concentration in the dispersion,
and the presence of an elevated rim in all posts. (d) SEM micrographs
for low and intermediate CTAB concentrations demonstrate that complete
filling is only reached above a minimum surfactant concentration.Potential explanations for this
behavior are changes of the stamp wetting and meniscus shape during
late drying stages, or the interplay of solute- and surfactant-driven
Marangoni flows that influence particle repartition.[43,45−47] Although this behavior beckons a separate in-depth
investigation, we further explore the efficacy of substrates produced
by this assembly approach for molecular ultradetection. As shown in Figure , this kinetically
controlled assembly technique paves the way to highly regular AuNR
arrays with feature sizes ranging from 200 nm up to tens of microns.
Figure 7
Feature
size variation from 10 μm to 200 nm (lattice parameters from
(a–d): 20 μm, 600, 500, and 400 nm). SEM images show
that tall, micron-sized structures (a) exhibit the best array quality
when prepared with high particle concentrations (up to 850 mM Au0) and very short induction periods (below 15 s), whereas submicrometer
structures (b–d) exhibit good filling for much lower particle
concentrations (around 100 mM Au0) when combined with intermediate
pre-assembly times (around 45 s). For all samples, a side-by-side
arrangement of AuNRs could be confirmed by high-resolution SEM images
(insets). For large structures in (a), parallel lamellae of lying
rods spanning over several micrometers were found.
Feature
size variation from 10 μm to 200 nm (lattice parameters from
(a–d): 20 μm, 600, 500, and 400 nm). SEM images show
that tall, micron-sized structures (a) exhibit the best array quality
when prepared with high particle concentrations (up to 850 mM Au0) and very short induction periods (below 15 s), whereas submicrometer
structures (b–d) exhibit good filling for much lower particle
concentrations (around 100 mM Au0) when combined with intermediate
pre-assembly times (around 45 s). For all samples, a side-by-side
arrangement of AuNRs could be confirmed by high-resolution SEM images
(insets). For large structures in (a), parallel lamellae of lying
rods spanning over several micrometers were found.In a recent work, we demonstrated that arrangement
of gold nanoparticles into periodic microarrays can significantly
boost SERS sensitivity via tailored lattice plasmon resonances.[22] Such lattice plasmon resonances typically occur
near a Rayleigh anomaly, i.e., a strong change of reflectivity due
to diffraction at the metal grating.[48] For
square arrays of gold nanoparticles, the lattice resonance wavelength
can be approximated as λmax = Lnsubs, where the lattice parameter L corresponds
to the center-to-center distance between neighboring posts and nsubs to the refractive index of the substrate.[49,50] Shown in Figure are AuNR arrays with L ranging from 20 μm
down to 400 nm. The corresponding extinction spectra (Figure S11) show that for each lattice parameter,
distinct resonance peaks arise near the predicted position of the
Rayleigh anomaly. Exploitation of these lattice resonances in SERS
spectroscopy demands precise matching with the wavelength of the excitation
laser and therefore requires highly regular arrays with submicrometer
periodicities for the typically employed UV–vis/NIR Raman setups.[2,51]To assess these substrates in a practical sensing application,
we chose the bacterial pigment/toxin pyocyanin as a probe molecule.
Pyocyanin is a Raman-active quorum-sensing molecule expressed by P. aeruginosa, which can be detected by SERS using
NIR excitation.[25] The SERS spectra of pyocyanin
in water and Luria–Bertrani (LB) bacterial growth medium were
recorded using patterned substrates with lattice parameters between
400 nm and 1.66 μm (corresponding to feature dimensions between
200 nm and 1 μm; see SI Table S1),
as shown in Figure . A 785 nm laser was chosen as the excitation source because it targets
both the first transparency window of biological systems and the excitation
wavelength of the analyte molecule. In fact, this laser is the most
widespread light source for Raman and other optical measurements in
biological media due to its relatively low tendency to cause photoluminescence
emission overlaying the signals.[22] With
the excitation at 785 nm, one would expect the highest signal enhancement
for a lattice parameter L = 500 nm, for which a resonance
around 770 nm is predicted by the formula for λmax above.
Figure 8
SERS spectroscopy of pyocyanin using hierarchically assembled gold
nanoparticle arrays and 785 nm excitation. (a) SERS spectra of 1 μm
pyocyanin in water, recorded on periodic square arrays with varying
lattice parameter. Strongly improved signals are observed for submicrometer
lattice arrays. The corresponding SERS intensity of the 1600 cm–1 peak rises steeply with decreasing lattice parameter
below a critical value of L = 740 nm (b). (c) The
normalized SERS intensity of 1 μM to 1 pM pyocyanin on the champion
substrate displays a sigmoidal shape, where the SERS signal undergoes
a 100-fold increase between 0.1 and 10 nM pyocyanin. (d) SERS spectra
from pyocyanin in LB broth prove efficient detection in complex media.
The spectra are the average from multiple measurements (n = 50–150) and measured with a laser power of 1.5 mW. The
integration time was 1 s for all spectra in (a) and 5 s for the data
shown in (d).
SERS spectroscopy of pyocyanin using hierarchically assembled gold
nanoparticle arrays and 785 nm excitation. (a) SERS spectra of 1 μm
pyocyanin in water, recorded on periodic square arrays with varying
lattice parameter. Strongly improved signals are observed for submicrometer
lattice arrays. The corresponding SERS intensity of the 1600 cm–1 peak rises steeply with decreasing lattice parameter
below a critical value of L = 740 nm (b). (c) The
normalized SERS intensity of 1 μM to 1 pM pyocyanin on the champion
substrate displays a sigmoidal shape, where the SERS signal undergoes
a 100-fold increase between 0.1 and 10 nM pyocyanin. (d) SERS spectra
from pyocyanin in LB broth prove efficient detection in complex media.
The spectra are the average from multiple measurements (n = 50–150) and measured with a laser power of 1.5 mW. The
integration time was 1 s for all spectra in (a) and 5 s for the data
shown in (d).Compared to arrays with
micrometer-sized lattices, the arrangements with submicrometer lattice
parameters indeed give rise to significantly enhanced SERS: in Figure a, the SERS spectrum
of pyocyanin in water recorded on a 1.66 μm lattice shows the
dominant Raman modes (1352 and ∼1600 cm–1), with a meager signal of ∼1000 counts/s, whereas the miniaturized
arrays with lattice parameters of 400 and 500 nm have close to 25-fold
intensity. Plotting the signal intensity of the dominant mode at 1600
cm–1 (from phenyl ring deformation and C–C
stretching) against the lattice parameter (Figure b) clearly reveals an inverse correlation
of feature size and SERS intensity. As all the probed substrates have
a very similar percentage of effective area covered with nanoparticles
(25–27%), the observed trends must arise from the different
lattice parameters and increasing surface-to-volume ratios with decreasing
feature size. Figure c displays the dependence of the SERS signal at 1600 cm–1 on the pyocyanin concentration in water, for the best substrate
(shown in Figure d),
suggesting a detection limit of approximately 10–12 M.For SERS-based clinical diagnostics, measuring in complex
biofluids represents a significant challenge due to fouling of the
plasmonic metal surface with biomolecules, which restricts the access
of the analyte to the surface and thus reduces signal enhancement.
In a recent study, we showed that micron-scale arrays of gold nanoparticles
allowed ultrasensitive in situ detection of pyocyanin in cultures
of P. aeruginosa, when coated with
mesoporous silica. The mesoporous layer acted as a sieve to prevent
larger proteins and biomolecules from fouling the gold nanoparticle
interface while allowing the percolation and detection of small molecules
down to femtomolar concentrations.[25] In
another recent study, a nacre-like film impregnated with AuNPs exhibited
a similar increase in signal due to filtration by the porous polymer
network compared to a film of bare AuNPs.[52] Intriguingly, we observe that although the lack of such a filtration
layer leads to a moderate signal background from the adsorption of
biomolecules like peptides and yeast tryptone, the submicrometer patterned
substrates introduced in this work still yield very clear SERS spectra
in biological media (Figure d).
Conclusions
A kinetically controlled approach for the
template-assisted assembly of plasmonic nanoparticles, which relies
on the addition of alcohol to aqueous AuNP dispersions, is reported
herein. This approach largely improves the large-scale reproducibility
and overall quality of the resulting arrays. As the crucial experimental
parameters in this method, we identified the dispersion medium composition,
solvent evaporation time, particle concentration, and surfactant concentration.
A strong correlation was found between particle pre-assembly at the
droplet–air interface and quality of the resulting final substrate.
Through a combination of experiments and simulations, the underlying
mechanism for this effect was studied, supporting the idea that the
removal of residual surfactant micelles from the interface of the
MUHEG-coating on the particles plays a crucial role in the self-assembly
behavior. The resulting colloidal destabilization leads to enhanced
surface activity and partial agglomeration of the gold nanoparticles,
which turned out to be advantageous for creating homogeneous AuNR
arrays over mm2 areas. This method enables the routine
fabrication of high-quality periodic arrays with submicrometer features
and was found to be easier, faster, and more reliable than common
multistep methods based on spin or dip coating and subsequent transfer
printing.The resulting structures successfully combine plasmonic
and photonic resonances to deliver significant improvements in SERS
sensor fabrication. Consequently, they allow sensitive biomolecule
detection with substantially reduced material costs and preparative
effort, as demonstrated with the bacterial pathogen pyocyanin both
in water and Luria–Bertrani medium. The capability of these
substrates for detecting bacterial quorum-sensing molecules in bacterial
growth medium, even without an additional filtration layer, should
facilitate in situ studies of bacterial growth/quorum sensing via
SERS and could be particularly useful for studying the effects of
surface topography on bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.[53] Finally, we propose that the particle assembly
mechanism discussed herein is of a universal nature and could have
important implications for the field of template-assisted colloidal
assembly. We therefore expect this proof of concept to trigger deeper
investigations utilizing nanoparticles of varied materials composition
and surface functionalization, as well as the exploration of a plethora
of pattern designs and target substrates.
Authors: Terry P Bigioni; Xiao-Min Lin; Toan T Nguyen; Eric I Corwin; Thomas A Witten; Heinrich M Jaeger Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2006-03-19 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Bo Yan; Anupama Thubagere; W Ranjith Premasiri; Lawrence D Ziegler; Luca Dal Negro; Björn M Reinhard Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Jon P Camden; Jon A Dieringer; Yingmin Wang; David J Masiello; Lawrence D Marks; George C Schatz; Richard P Van Duyne Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-08-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Judith Langer; Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi; Javier Aizpurua; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Baptiste Auguié; Jeremy J Baumberg; Guillermo C Bazan; Steven E J Bell; Anja Boisen; Alexandre G Brolo; Jaebum Choo; Dana Cialla-May; Volker Deckert; Laura Fabris; Karen Faulds; F Javier García de Abajo; Royston Goodacre; Duncan Graham; Amanda J Haes; Christy L Haynes; Christian Huck; Tamitake Itoh; Mikael Käll; Janina Kneipp; Nicholas A Kotov; Hua Kuang; Eric C Le Ru; Hiang Kwee Lee; Jian-Feng Li; Xing Yi Ling; Stefan A Maier; Thomas Mayerhöfer; Martin Moskovits; Kei Murakoshi; Jwa-Min Nam; Shuming Nie; Yukihiro Ozaki; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Perez-Juste; Juergen Popp; Annemarie Pucci; Stephanie Reich; Bin Ren; George C Schatz; Timur Shegai; Sebastian Schlücker; Li-Lin Tay; K George Thomas; Zhong-Qun Tian; Richard P Van Duyne; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Yue Wang; Katherine A Willets; Chuanlai Xu; Hongxing Xu; Yikai Xu; Yuko S Yamamoto; Bing Zhao; Luis M Liz-Marzán Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Javier Plou; Pablo S Valera; Isabel García; Carlos D L de Albuquerque; Arkaitz Carracedo; Luis M Liz-Marzán Journal: ACS Photonics Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 7.529
Authors: David Vila-Liarte; Maximilian W Feil; Aurora Manzi; Juan Luis Garcia-Pomar; He Huang; Markus Döblinger; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Jochen Feldmann; Lakshminarayana Polavarapu; Agustín Mihi Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 16.823