Literature DB >> 30844131

Cortical Activation Elicited by Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Predicts Postoperative Motor Side Effects.

Andrew Romeo1, Darcy M Dubuc2, Christopher L Gonzalez2, Naishal D Patel2, Gary Cutter3, Haley Delk2, Barton L Guthrie1, Harrison C Walker2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders, improvement varies substantially in individuals, across clinical trials, and over time. Noninvasive biomarkers that predict the individual response to DBS could be used to optimize outcomes and drive technological innovation in neuromodulation. We sought to evaluate whether noninvasive event related potentials elicited by subthalamic DBS during surgical targeting predict the tolerability of a given stimulation site in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
METHODS: Using electroencephalography, we measured event related potentials elicited by 20 Hz DBS over a range of stimulus intensities across the spatial extent of the implanted electrode array in 11 patients. We correlated event related potential timing and morphology with the stimulus amplitude thresholds for motor side effects during postoperative programming at ≥130 Hz.
RESULTS: During surgical targeting, DBS at 20 Hz elicits large amplitude, high frequency activity (evoked HFA) with mean onset latency of 9.0 ± 0.3 msec and a mean frequency of 175.8 ± 7.8 Hz. The lowest DBS amplitude that elicits the HFA predicts thresholds for motor side effects during postoperative stimulation at ≥130 Hz (p < 0.001, ANOVA).
CONCLUSION: Event related potentials elicited by DBS can predict clinically relevant corticospinal activation by stimulation after surgery. Noninvasive scalp physiology requires no patient interaction and could serve as a biomarker to guide targeting, postoperative programming, and emerging technologies such as directional and closed-loop stimulation.
© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical evoked potential; EEG; Parkinson's disease; deep brain stimulation; high frequency activity; subthalamic nucleus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30844131     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

1.  Real-time suppression and amplification of frequency-specific neural activity using stimulation evoked oscillations.

Authors:  David Escobar Sanabria; Luke A Johnson; Ying Yu; Zachary Busby; Shane Nebeck; Jianyu Zhang; Noam Harel; Matthew D Johnson; Gregory F Molnar; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Latency of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation-evoked cortical activity as a potential biomarker for postoperative motor side effects.

Authors:  Zachary T Irwin; Mohammad Z Awad; Christopher L Gonzalez; Arie Nakhmani; J Nicole Bentley; Thomas A Moore; Kenneth G Smithson; Barton L Guthrie; Harrison C Walker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Subcortical short-term plasticity elicited by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Mohammad Z Awad; Ryan J Vaden; Zachary T Irwin; Christopher L Gonzalez; Sarah Black; Arie Nakhmani; Byron C Jaeger; J Nicole Bentley; Barton L Guthrie; Harrison C Walker
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.511

4.  Physiologically informed neuromodulation.

Authors:  Karen Wendt; Timothy Denison; Gaynor Foster; Lothar Krinke; Alix Thomson; Saydra Wilson; Alik S Widge
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  The impact of pulse timing on cortical and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evoked potentials.

Authors:  Brett A Campbell; Leonardo Favi Bocca; David Escobar Sanabria; Julio Almeida; Richard Rammo; Sean J Nagel; Andre G Machado; Kenneth B Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.