Literature DB >> 30843206

Atypical ductal hyperplasia is a multipotent precursor of breast carcinoma.

Tanjina Kader1,2, Prue Hill3, Magnus Zethoven1, David L Goode1,2, Kenneth Elder4, Niko Thio1, Maria Doyle1, Timothy Semple1, Wajiha Sufyan5, David J Byrne1, Jia-Min B Pang1, Anand Murugasu4, Islam M Miligy6,7, Andrew R Green6,7, Emad A Rakha6,7, Stephen B Fox1, G Bruce Mann4, Ian G Campbell1,2,8, Kylie L Gorringe1,2,8.   

Abstract

The current model for breast cancer progression proposes independent 'low grade (LG)-like' and 'high grade (HG)-like' pathways but lacks a known precursor to HG cancer. We applied low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) with and without carcinoma to shed light on breast cancer progression. Fourteen out of twenty isolated ADH cases harboured at least one copy number alteration (CNA), but had fewer aberrations than LG or HG ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). ADH carried more HG-like CNA than LG DCIS (e.g. 8q gain). Correspondingly, 64% (7/11) of ADH cases with synchronous HG carcinoma were clonally related, similar to LG carcinoma (67%, 6/9). This study represents a significant shift in our understanding of breast cancer progression, with ADH as a common precursor lesion to the independent 'low grade-like' and 'high grade-like' pathways. These data suggest that ADH can be a precursor of HG breast cancer and that LG and HG carcinomas can evolve from a similar ancestor lesion. We propose that although LG DCIS may be committed to a LG molecular pathway, ADH may remain multipotent, progressing to either LG or HG carcinoma. This multipotent nature suggests that some ADH cases could be more clinically significant than LG DCIS, requiring biomarkers for personalising management.
Copyright © 2019 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2019 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atypical ductal hyperplasia; benign breast disease; breast cancer progression; clonal; copy number; ductal carcinoma in situ; pre-malignant breast lesions; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30843206     DOI: 10.1002/path.5262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  8 in total

1.  The genetic architecture of breast papillary lesions as a predictor of progression to carcinoma.

Authors:  Ian G Campbell; Kylie L Gorringe; Tanjina Kader; Kenneth Elder; Magnus Zethoven; Timothy Semple; Prue Hill; David L Goode; Niko Thio; Dane Cheasley; Simone M Rowley; David J Byrne; Jia-Min Pang; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-12

2.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; David N Brown; Ju Youn Lee; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Pier Selenica; Rui Bi; Felipe C Geyer; Andrea Gazzo; Edaise M da Silva; Mahsa Vahdatinia; Anthe A Stylianou; Lorenzo Ferrando; Hannah Y Wen; James B Hicks; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Performance of Automated Dissection on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay.

Authors:  Peng Qi; Qian-Ming Bai; Qian-Lan Yao; Wen-Tao Yang; Xiao-Yan Zhou
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

4.  Development and Validation of a Simple-to-Use Nomogram for Predicting the Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia on Core Needle Biopsy in Ultrasound-Detected Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Yun-Xia Huang; Ya-Ling Chen; Shi-Ping Li; Ju-Ping Shen; Ke Zuo; Shi-Chong Zhou; Cai Chang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The breast pre-cancer atlas illustrates the molecular and micro-environmental diversity of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Daniela Nachmanson; Adam Officer; Hidetoshi Mori; Jonathan Gordon; Mark F Evans; Joseph Steward; Huazhen Yao; Thomas O'Keefe; Farnaz Hasteh; Gary S Stein; Kristen Jepsen; Donald L Weaver; Gillian L Hirst; Brian L Sprague; Laura J Esserman; Alexander D Borowsky; Janet L Stein; Olivier Harismendy
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-13

6.  The genetic architecture of breast papillary lesions as a predictor of progression to carcinoma.

Authors:  Ian G Campbell; Kylie L Gorringe; Tanjina Kader; Kenneth Elder; Magnus Zethoven; Timothy Semple; Prue Hill; David L Goode; Niko Thio; Dane Cheasley; Simone M Rowley; David J Byrne; Jia-Min Pang; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Comparable cancer-relevant mutation profiles in synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Surendra Kumar; Fredrik Wärnberg; Torben Lüders; Vessela Kristensen; Therese Sørlie
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 8.  Evaluating statistical approaches to define clonal origin of tumours using bulk DNA sequencing: context is everything.

Authors:  Tanjina Kader; Magnus Zethoven; Kylie L Gorringe
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 13.583

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.