Literature DB >> 30843190

Bedside tests for predicting difficult airways: an abridged Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy systematic review.

D Roth1, N L Pace2, A Lee3,4, K Hovhannisyan5, A M Warenits6, J Arrich6, H Herkner6.   

Abstract

Although bedside screening tests are routinely used to identify people at high risk of having a difficult airway, their clinical utility is unclear. We estimated the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used bedside examination tests for assessing the airway in adult patients without apparent anatomical abnormalities scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia. We searched for studies that reported our pre-specified bedside index screening tests against a reference standard, published in any language, from date of inception to 16 December 2016, in seven bibliographic databases. We included 133 studies (127 cohort type and 6 case-control) involving 844,206 participants. Overall, their methodological quality (according to QUADAS-2, a standard tool for assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies) was moderate to high. Our pre-specified tests were: the Mallampati test (6 studies); modified Mallampati test (105 studies); Wilson risk score (6 studies); thyromental distance (52 studies); sternomental distance (18 studies); mouth opening test (34 studies); and the upper lip bite test (30 studies). Difficult facemask ventilation, difficult laryngoscopy, difficult intubation and failed intubation were the reference standards in seven, 92, 50 and two studies, respectively. Across all reference standards, we found all index tests had relatively low sensitivities, with high variability, but specificities were consistently and markedly higher than sensitivities. For difficult laryngoscopy, the sensitivity and specificity (95%CI) of the upper lip bite test were 0.67 (0.45-0.83) and 0.92 (0.86-0.95), respectively; upper lip bite test sensitivity (95%CI) was significantly higher than that for the mouth opening test (0.22, 0.13-0.33; p < 0.001). For difficult tracheal intubation, the modified Mallampati test had a significantly higher sensitivity (95%CI) at 0.51 (0.40-0.61) compared with mouth opening (0.27, 0.16-0.41; p < 0.001) and thyromental distance (0.24, 0.12-0.43; p < 0.001). Although the upper lip bite test showed the most favourable diagnostic test accuracy properties, none of the common bedside screening tests is well suited for detecting unanticipated difficult airways, as many of them are missed.
© 2019 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway assessment: co-existing disease; difficult airway; laryngoscopic view: grading; obesity: airway evaluation; sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30843190     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  18 in total

1.  Limited Utility of Routine Tests Prior to Ophthalmologic Surgery: An Observational Study in a Japanese Hospital.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Matsuo; Yoshinori Takemura; Mitsuaki Yamazaki
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2021-07-06

2.  Difficult Laryngoscopy Prediction Score for Intubation in Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sorravit Savatmongkorngul; Panrikan Pitakwong; Pungkava Sricharoen; Chaiyaporn Yuksen; Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong; Sorawich Watcharakitpaisan
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Successful advancement of endotracheal tube with combined fiberoptic bronchoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in a patient with a huge goiter.

Authors:  Sung Mi Kim; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-10

4.  Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Wilson's score and intubation prediction score for prediction of difficult airway in an eastern Indian population-A prospective single-blind study.

Authors:  Sri Vidhya; Brahmanand Sharma; Bhanu P Swain; U K Singh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  The effect of brief pre-anesthetic exercise therapy of jaw and neck joints on mouth opening, neck extension, and intubation conditions during induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sue Young Lee; Sung Il Bae; Sang-Hwan Do; Ju-Tae Sohn; Jin-Woo Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Awake supraglottic airway guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: a case series and narrative review.

Authors:  Wan Yen Lim; Patrick Wong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-09-02

7.  The evaluation of maximum condyle-tragus distance can predict difficult airway management without exposing upper respiratory tract; a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Dandan Hu; Xu Chen; Xuebing Zhang; Min Xia; Xiaoqing Chai; Sheng Wang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Comparative Study of Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters for Defining a Difficult Airway in Patients with Obesity.

Authors:  Ed Carlos Rey Moura; Andrey Salgado Moraes Filho; Eduardo José Silva Gomes de Oliveira; Thyago Trisotto Freire; Plínio da Cunha Leal; Lyvia Maria Rodrigues de Sousa Gomes; Elizabeth Teixeira Noguera Servin; Caio Márcio Barros de Oliveira
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; George Kovacs; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.

Authors:  Dominik Roth; Nathan L Pace; Anna Lee; Karen Hovhannisyan; Alexandra-Maria Warenits; Jasmin Arrich; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.