Anja Soldan1, Corinne Pettigrew2, Anne M Fagan2, Suzanne E Schindler2, Abhay Moghekar2, Christopher Fowler2, Qiao-Xin Li2, Steven J Collins2, Cynthia Carlsson2, Sanjay Asthana2, Colin L Masters2, Sterling Johnson2, John C Morris2, Marilyn Albert2, Alden L Gross2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. asoldan1@jhmi.edu. 2. From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term cognitive trajectories of individuals with normal cognition at baseline and distinct amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration (ATN) profiles. METHODS: Pooling data across 4 cohort studies, 814 cognitively normal participants (mean baseline age = 59.6 years) were classified into 8 ATN groups using baseline CSF levels of β-amyloid 1-42 as a measure of amyloid (A), phosphorylated tau 181 as a measure of tau (T), and total tau as a measure of neurodegeneration (N). Cognitive performance was measured using a previously validated global factor score and with the Mini-Mental State Examination. We compared the cognitive trajectories across groups using growth curve models (mean follow-up time = 7 years). RESULTS: Using different model formulations and cut points for determining biomarker abnormality, only the group with abnormal levels of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (A+T+N+) showed consistently greater cognitive decline than the group with normal levels of all biomarkers (A-T-N-). Replicating prior findings using the 2011 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association/suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology schema, only individuals with abnormal levels of both amyloid and phosphorylated tau 181 or total tau (stage 2) showed greater cognitive decline than those with normal biomarker levels (stage 0). CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with the hypothesis that both elevated brain amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles are necessary to observe accelerated neurodegeneration, which in turn leads to cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term cognitive trajectories of individuals with normal cognition at baseline and distinct amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration (ATN) profiles. METHODS: Pooling data across 4 cohort studies, 814 cognitively normal participants (mean baseline age = 59.6 years) were classified into 8 ATN groups using baseline CSF levels of β-amyloid 1-42 as a measure of amyloid (A), phosphorylated tau 181 as a measure of tau (T), and total tau as a measure of neurodegeneration (N). Cognitive performance was measured using a previously validated global factor score and with the Mini-Mental State Examination. We compared the cognitive trajectories across groups using growth curve models (mean follow-up time = 7 years). RESULTS: Using different model formulations and cut points for determining biomarker abnormality, only the group with abnormal levels of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (A+T+N+) showed consistently greater cognitive decline than the group with normal levels of all biomarkers (A-T-N-). Replicating prior findings using the 2011 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association/suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology schema, only individuals with abnormal levels of both amyloid and phosphorylated tau 181 or total tau (stage 2) showed greater cognitive decline than those with normal biomarker levels (stage 0). CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with the hypothesis that both elevated brain amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles are necessary to observe accelerated neurodegeneration, which in turn leads to cognitive decline.
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Linda K McEvoy; Wesley K Thompson; Dominic Holland; J Cooper Roddey; Kaj Blennow; Paul S Aisen; James B Brewer; Bradley T Hyman; Anders M Dale Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rawan Tarawneh; Gina D'Angelo; Elizabeth Macy; Chengjie Xiong; Deborah Carter; Nigel J Cairns; Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Mark A Mintun; Jack H Ladenson; Jin-Moo Lee; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Ulf Andreasson; Staffan Persson; Maria C Carrillo; Steven Collins; Sonia Chalbot; Neal Cutler; Diane Dufour-Rainfray; Anne M Fagan; Niels H H Heegaard; Ging-Yuek Robin Hsiung; Bradley Hyman; Khalid Iqbal; Stephan A Kaeser; Stephan A Käser; D Richard Lachno; Alberto Lleó; Piotr Lewczuk; José L Molinuevo; Piero Parchi; Axel Regeniter; Robert A Rissman; Robert Rissman; Hanna Rosenmann; Giuseppe Sancesario; Johannes Schröder; Leslie M Shaw; Charlotte E Teunissen; John Q Trojanowski; Hugo Vanderstichele; Manu Vandijck; Marcel M Verbeek; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: E H Corder; A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D E Schmechel; P C Gaskell; G W Small; A D Roses; J L Haines; M A Pericak-Vance Journal: Science Date: 1993-08-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Annika Olsson; Hugo Vanderstichele; Niels Andreasen; Geert De Meyer; Anders Wallin; Björn Holmberg; Lars Rosengren; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Kaj Blennow Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Stephen D Weigand; Heather J Wiste; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Robert J Ivnik; Rosebud O Roberts; Walter A Rocca; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Qiao-Xin Li; Victor L Villemagne; James D Doecke; Alan Rembach; Shannon Sarros; Shiji Varghese; Amelia McGlade; Katrina M Laughton; Kelly K Pertile; Christopher J Fowler; Rebecca L Rumble; Brett O Trounson; Kevin Taddei; Stephanie R Rainey-Smith; Simon M Laws; Joanne S Robertson; Lisbeth A Evered; Brendan Silbert; Kathryn A Ellis; Christopher C Rowe; S Lance Macaulay; David Darby; Ralph N Martins; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Steven Collins Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; David S Knopman; Val Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Mary M Machulda; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Joseph R Winer; Bryce A Mander; Randolph F Helfrich; Anne Maass; Theresa M Harrison; Suzanne L Baker; Robert T Knight; William J Jagust; Matthew P Walker Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Michael C Donohue; Rema Raman; Chung-Kai Sun; Roy Yaari; Karen Holdridge; Eric Siemers; Keith A Johnson; Paul S Aisen Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Giovanni B Frisoni; Daniele Altomare; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Federica Ribaldi; Rik van der Kant; Rik Ossenkoppele; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey Cummings; Cornelia van Duijn; Peter M Nilsson; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Philip Scheltens; Bruno Dubois Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 34.870
Authors: Alessandra Dodich; Aline Mendes; Frédéric Assal; Christian Chicherio; Barinjaka Rakotomiaramanana; Paulina Andryszak; Cristina Festari; Federica Ribaldi; Max Scheffler; Roger Schibli; Adam J Schwarz; Dina Zekry; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Marina Boccardi; Paul G Unschuld; Gabriel Gold; Giovanni B Frisoni; Valentina Garibotto Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Katheryn A Q Cousins; Jeffrey S Phillips; David J Irwin; Edward B Lee; David A Wolk; Leslie M Shaw; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Sarah E Burke; Nikolas G Kinney; Garrett S Gibbons; Corey T McMillan; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Frederik Barkhof; Valentina Garibotto; Susan M Landau; Agneta Nordberg; Bart N M van Berckel Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Katheryn A Q Cousins; David J Irwin; David A Wolk; Edward B Lee; Leslie M J Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Fulvio Da Re; Garrett S Gibbons; Murray Grossman; Jeffrey S Phillips Journal: Brain Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 13.501