Literature DB >> 30841947

The integrated palliative care outcome scale for patients with palliative care needs: Factors related to and experiences of the use in acute care settings.

Susanne Lind1, Lars Wallin2,3,4, Carl Johan Fürst5,6, Ingela Beck5,6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with palliative care needs is characterized by both enablers and barriers. The ways in which healthcare professionals experience the use of assessment tools is important. Our aims were to explore factors contributing to or hindering patients with palliative care needs in assessing their symptoms with the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) and to explore healthcare professionals' experiences of the use of IPOS in acute care settings.
METHOD: Data were collected as a part of the evaluation of the feasibility of an implementation strategy for introducing IPOS. Data from three participating acute care units were included. We used descriptive and analytical statistics; a qualitative content analysis was also performed. RESULT: A total of 309 patients were eligible to be offered assessment of symptoms with IPOS. Of these 69 (22%) had completed IPOS. A significant positive association was found between healthcare professionals' participation in training sessions and completed IPOS. The experiences of IPOS were split into two categories: "IPOS acting as a facilitator" and "barriers to the use of IPOS." The use of IPOS was described as contributing to person-centered care of patients with palliative care needs and inspiration to improved routines. Healthcare professionals' feelings of uncertainty about how to approach severely ill patients and their family members appear to have hindered their use of IPOS. SIGNIFICANCE OF
RESULTS: We found an association between healthcare professionals' participation in training sessions and patients who completed IPOS, indicating the need for a high degree of attendance at the training to achieve successful implementation. The healthcare professionals expressed feelings of insecurity concerning the use of IPOS indicating a need for further education and clinical support in its use of IPOS. Nevertheless, use of IPOS was considered to contribute to improved care of patients with palliative care needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute care settings; Implementation; Integrated palliative care; Mixed-method; Outcome scale; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30841947     DOI: 10.1017/S1478951518001104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


  3 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of Synthetic Data Generation towards an Improved Patient Stratification in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Waldemar Hahn; Katharina Schütte; Kristian Schultz; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Martin Sedlmayr; Ulrich Schuler; Martin Eichler; Saptarshi Bej; Markus Wolfien
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-04

2.  Systematic symptom and problem assessment at admission to the palliative care ward - perspectives and prognostic impacts.

Authors:  Anja Coym; Anneke Ullrich; Lisa Kathrin Hackspiel; Mareike Ahrenholz; Carsten Bokemeyer; Karin Oechsle
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory to understand processes and context.

Authors:  Andy Bradshaw; Martina Santarelli; Malene Mulderrig; Assem Khamis; Kathryn Sartain; Jason W Boland; Michael I Bennett; Miriam Johnson; Mark Pearson; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 4.762

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.