Literature DB >> 30840884

Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Cellular Heterogeneity of Pluripotency Transition and X Chromosome Dynamics during Early Mouse Development.

Shangli Cheng1, Yu Pei2, Liqun He3, Guangdun Peng4, Björn Reinius5, Patrick P L Tam6, Naihe Jing7, Qiaolin Deng8.   

Abstract

Following implantation, the epiblast (EPI) cells transit from the naive to primed pluripotency, accompanied by dynamic changes in X chromosome activity in females. To investigate the molecular attributes of this process, we performed single-cell RNA-seq analysis of 1,724 cells of E5.25, E5.5, E6.25, and E6.5 mouse embryos. We identified three cellular states in the EPI cells that capture the transition along the pluripotency continuum and the acquisition of primitive streak propensity. The transition of three EPI states was driven by inductive signaling activity emanating from the visceral endoderm (VE). In the EPI of female embryos, X chromosome reactivation (XCR) was initiated prior to the completion of imprinted X chromosome inactivation (XCI), and the ensuing random XCI was highly asynchronous. Moreover, imprinted paternal XCI proceeded faster in the VE than the extraembryonic ectoderm. Our study has provided a detailed molecular roadmap of the emergent lineage commitment before gastrulation and characterized X chromosome dynamics during early mouse development.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X chromosome inactivation dynamics; epiblast heterogeneity; pluripotency transition; pregastrula development

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30840884     DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  32 in total

Review 1.  Transcription factor chromatin profiling genome-wide using uliCUT&RUN in single cells and individual blastocysts.

Authors:  Benjamin J Patty; Sarah J Hainer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Practical Considerations for Single-Cell Genomics.

Authors:  Claire Regan; Jonathan Preall
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2022-08

3.  Controlled X-chromosome dynamics defines meiotic potential of female mouse in vitro germ cells.

Authors:  Jacqueline Severino; Moritz Bauer; Tom Mattimoe; Niccolò Arecco; Luca Cozzuto; Patricia Lorden; Norio Hamada; Yoshiaki Nosaka; So I Nagaoka; Pauline Audergon; Antonio Tarruell; Holger Heyn; Katsuhiko Hayashi; Mitinori Saitou; Bernhard Payer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 14.012

Review 4.  Gene regulation in time and space during X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Agnese Loda; Samuel Collombet; Edith Heard
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 113.915

Review 5.  All models are wrong, but some are useful: Establishing standards for stem cell-based embryo models.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; Fredrik Lanner; Carla Mulas; Harry G Leitch
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.765

6.  Directed Evolution of an Enhanced POU Reprogramming Factor for Cell Fate Engineering.

Authors:  Daisylyn Senna Tan; Yanpu Chen; Ya Gao; Anastasia Bednarz; Yuanjie Wei; Vikas Malik; Derek Hoi-Hang Ho; Mingxi Weng; Sik Yin Ho; Yogesh Srivastava; Sergiy Velychko; Xiaoxiao Yang; Ligang Fan; Johnny Kim; Johannes Graumann; Gary D Stormo; Thomas Braun; Jian Yan; Hans R Schöler; Ralf Jauch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  Single-cell profiling for advancing birth defects research and prevention.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Malte Spielmann; Sean G Megason; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.661

8.  Basement membrane remodelling regulates mouse embryogenesis.

Authors:  Christos Kyprianou; Neophytos Christodoulou; Russell S Hamilton; Wallis Nahaboo; Diana Suarez Boomgaard; Gianluca Amadei; Isabelle Migeotte; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Integrated analysis of Xist upregulation and X-chromosome inactivation with single-cell and single-allele resolution.

Authors:  Annalisa Marsico; Edda G Schulz; Guido Pacini; Ilona Dunkel; Norbert Mages; Verena Mutzel; Bernd Timmermann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell Transcriptome Identifies Reprogramming Driver Factors for Efficiency Improvement.

Authors:  Hanshuang Li; Mingmin Song; Wuritu Yang; Pengbo Cao; Lei Zheng; Yongchun Zuo
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 8.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.