Literature DB >> 30840752

Ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm for positron emission tomographic image reconstruction using belief kernels.

Yang-Ming Zhu1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of incorporating prior information in list mode, time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. This investigation consists of an IEC phantom study and a patient study. For the image under reconstruction, the activity profile along a line of response is treated as a priori and is combined with the TOF measurement to define a belief kernel used for forward and backward projections during the OSEM image reconstruction. Activity profiles are smoothed and combined with the TOF kernels to control the adverse impact of noise, and different levels of smoothness are attempted. The standard TOF OSEM reconstruction is used as a baseline for comparison. Image quality is assessed using a combination of visual assessment and quantitative measurement including contrast recovery coefficients (CRC) and background variability. On the IEC phantom study, the reconstruction using belief kernels converges faster and the reconstructed images are more appealing. The CRCs for all sizes of regions of interest on images reconstructed with belief kernels are higher than those of the baseline. The background variability, measured as a coefficient of variation, is generally lower for the images reconstructed using belief kernels. Similar observations occur on the patient study. Particularly, the images reconstructed using belief kernels have better defined lesions, improved contrast, and reduced background noise. OSEM PET image reconstruction using belief kernels that combine the information from prior images and TOF measurements seems promising and worth further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  belief kernels; ordered subset expectation maximization; positron emission tomography; time-of-flight

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840752      PMCID: PMC6248260          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  8 in total

Review 1.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimally stabilized PET image denoising using trilateral filtering.

Authors:  Awais Mansoor; Ulas Bagci; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

4.  Guided image filtering.

Authors:  Kaiming He; Jian Sun; Xiaoou Tang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges.

Authors:  Shan Tong; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-10-01

6.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Non-local means denoising of dynamic PET images.

Authors:  Joyita Dutta; Richard M Leahy; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  S Vandenberghe; E Mikhaylova; E D'Hoe; P Mollet; J S Karp
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-02-16
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastases and Nodal Staging in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Qiufang Liu; Jiaru Li; Bowen Xin; Yuyun Sun; Dagan Feng; Michael J Fulham; Xiuying Wang; Shaoli Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.