Literature DB >> 30840717

Deep convolutional neural networks for the automated segmentation of malignant pleural mesothelioma on computed tomography scans.

Eyjolfur Gudmundsson1, Christopher M Straus1, Samuel G Armato1.   

Abstract

Tumor volume has been a topic of interest in the staging, prognostic evaluation, and treatment response assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained separately for the left and right hemithoraces on the task of differentiating between pleural thickening and normal thoracic tissue on computed tomography (CT) scans. A total of 4259 and 6192 axial sections containing segmented tumor were used to train the left-hemithorax CNN and the right-hemithorax CNN, respectively. Two distinct test sets of 131 sections from the CT scans of 43 patients were used to evaluate segmentation performance by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between deep CNN-generated tumor segmentations and reference tumor segmentations provided by a total of eight observers. Median DSC values ranged from 0.662 to 0.800 over the two test sets when comparing deep CNN-generated segmentations with observer reference segmentations. The deep CNN-based method achieved significantly higher DSC values for all three observers on the test set that allowed direct comparisons with a previously published automated segmentation method of MPM tumor on CT scans ( p < 0.0005 ). A deep CNN was implemented for the automated segmentation of MPM tumor on CT scans, showing superior performance to a previously published method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; image segmentation; malignant pleural mesothelioma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840717      PMCID: PMC6151316          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.034503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  27 in total

1.  Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  R T Heelan; V W Rusch; C B Begg; D M Panicek; J F Caravelli; C Eisen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Assessment of therapy responses and prediction of survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma through computer-aided volumetric measurement on computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Binsheng Zhao; Lee M Krug; Nicole M Ishill; Remy C Lim; Pingzhen Guo; Matthew Gorski; Raja Flores; Chaya S Moskowitz; Valerie W Rusch; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: the spectrum of manifestations on CT in 70 cases.

Authors:  C S Ng; R F Munden; H I Libshitz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 5.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: the standard of care and challenges for future management.

Authors:  Jan P van Meerbeeck; Arnaud Scherpereel; Veerle F Surmont; Paul Baas
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vogelzang; James J Rusthoven; James Symanowski; Claude Denham; E Kaukel; Pierre Ruffie; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Michael Boyer; Salih Emri; Christian Manegold; Clet Niyikiza; Paolo Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Modeling of mesothelioma growth demonstrates weaknesses of current response criteria.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Oxnard; Samuel G Armato; Hedy L Kindler
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Automated lung segmentation for thoracic CT impact on computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; William F Sensakovic
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  A Scherpereel; P Astoul; P Baas; T Berghmans; H Clayson; P de Vuyst; H Dienemann; F Galateau-Salle; C Hennequin; G Hillerdal; C Le Péchoux; L Mutti; J-C Pairon; R Stahel; P van Houtte; J van Meerbeeck; D Waller; W Weder
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  M J Byrne; A K Nowak
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep learning-based segmentation of malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor on computed tomography scans: application to scans demonstrating pleural effusion.

Authors:  Eyjolfur Gudmundsson; Christopher M Straus; Feng Li; Samuel G Armato
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly.

Authors:  Saskia Bos; Sara Ricciardi; Edward J Caruana; Nilüfer Aylin Acet Öztürk; Dimitrios Magouliotis; Cecilia Pompili; Marcello Migliore; Robin Vos; Federica Meloni; Stefano Elia; Merel Hellemons
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 3.  A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  PleThora: Pleural effusion and thoracic cavity segmentations in diseased lungs for benchmarking chest CT processing pipelines.

Authors:  Kendall J Kiser; Sara Ahmed; Sonja Stieb; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Hesham Elhalawani; Peter Y S Park; Nathan S Doyle; Brandon J Wang; Arko Barman; Zhao Li; W Jim Zheng; Clifton D Fuller; Luca Giancardo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.